Active Users:770 Time:16/03/2026 04:52:03 PM
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV Etzel Send a noteboard - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM
I don't see as how RJ's original probable intent matters a whole lot in the discussion. I agree that an Asmo-killer pov would be best, but I can't agree that it will be the method.


Because it obviously would have a more powerful impact. If Graendal was the killer, BS just had the chance to reveal it in her PoV in TGS, prologue. Why then, should he skip this opportunity to let it e.g. Moridin tell someone else that Graendal did it? Makes no sense.

And I actually bet that no one, who thought Graendal did it, even considered the possibilty before TGS that the revelation won't be in Graendal's PoV. The idea that a third person will reveal the killer is just an attempt to rescue a wrong theory. Graendaldunnit is as dead as Graendal, IMO.
Reply to message
Another blow to the Graendaldunnit-theory - 14/11/2009 10:41:32 AM 1447 Views
I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 14/11/2009 02:53:25 PM 872 Views
He has stated that they will put the mystery to rest in the final books... - 14/11/2009 04:02:53 PM 1018 Views
I actually figured a way that this could come up quite naturally without Graendal - 14/11/2009 04:11:24 PM 967 Views
RJ said it will probably revealed in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 04:46:20 PM 815 Views
And Brandon said Harriet gave him the freedom to tell the story as he wishes. - 14/11/2009 06:05:40 PM 772 Views
We (you, me & RJ) agree that it would be best to reveal it in the killer's PoV - 14/11/2009 06:40:33 PM 807 Views
Wait...wait...this is funny. - 20/11/2009 02:05:26 AM 685 Views
I often explained it, because many don't seem to get it - 20/11/2009 12:17:21 PM 669 Views
So maybe Graendal didn't care enough about Asmodean, either. - 20/11/2009 02:07:02 PM 706 Views
Neither Graendal nor Slayer mention killing Asmo... - 20/11/2009 02:46:40 PM 836 Views
I'm sure you can see... - 20/11/2009 03:25:41 PM 847 Views
Well... - 20/11/2009 05:23:28 PM 692 Views
It seems you think I don't read any posts and you certainly haven't read this board much. - 14/11/2009 04:30:06 PM 764 Views
That's wrong - 14/11/2009 04:45:02 PM 880 Views
Not one word of what I wrote is wrong. - 15/11/2009 01:41:18 AM 821 Views
right here - 15/11/2009 03:04:57 AM 748 Views
BS just said that Graendal will be mentioned, not appear as a character in ToM. *NM* - 15/11/2009 09:58:53 AM 315 Views
I never said "appear as a character." *NM* - 15/11/2009 12:14:16 PM 315 Views
- 15/11/2009 12:44:07 PM 822 Views
Re: I don't see any reason the Graendal theory is wrong from that. - 19/11/2009 12:07:25 AM 979 Views
Just once it would be nice to get a blow from Graendal. *NM* - 14/11/2009 03:50:41 PM 297 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 14/11/2009 04:46:33 PM 303 Views
Nope, that's not a blow against it at all - 14/11/2009 06:32:10 PM 666 Views
I don't agree with this interpretation at all - your grasping for straws... - 14/11/2009 07:34:58 PM 777 Views
Agreed *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:55:44 AM 297 Views
I disagree... - 15/11/2009 09:57:23 AM 769 Views
Only if you make the assumption that she was the most obvious to Sanderson. - 14/11/2009 07:37:39 PM 835 Views
Personally... - 15/11/2009 12:11:50 AM 830 Views
I think... - 15/11/2009 09:55:42 AM 696 Views
No. Try again. - 14/11/2009 11:35:59 PM 858 Views
Actually this is more against the Slayer theory - 15/11/2009 01:49:08 PM 753 Views
Nonsense... - 15/11/2009 02:06:04 PM 724 Views
Your tenacity is impressive. - 15/11/2009 03:14:50 PM 792 Views
Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 03:53:22 PM 701 Views
Re: Absolut statements in such discussions... - 15/11/2009 05:57:25 PM 657 Views
It's also possible that Lanfear gave Slayer the task. *NM* - 15/11/2009 07:55:17 PM 943 Views
Pa'ah did it. *NM* - 18/11/2009 01:02:09 AM 325 Views
It is not gone, I have a copy of it *NM* - 15/11/2009 06:19:11 PM 300 Views
I agree with Etzel. - 20/11/2009 02:59:44 AM 696 Views

Reply to Message