Another thing Brandon confirmed in that brief discussion while he was setting up his laptop to show the few people who remained behind after the signing some WoK concept art is that RJ indeed did not compare strength between men and women (for the usual reasons RJ told us, Brandon confirmed). He kept two separate lists and two separate "quick guides".
I think that we have to take RJ at his word when he says functionally a women is the equal to a man despite the individual quirks of saidin and saidar, and just assume that an effect which may require more saidin to perform may very well require less saidar to execute.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM
1974 Views
Except...
- 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM
995 Views
There's no evidence for that
- 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM
940 Views
I agree with Sidious - we have no evidence at this time, so she should remain off the list
- 19/11/2009 04:38:31 PM
952 Views
It's common sense
- 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM
873 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing
- 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM
1001 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia...
- 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM
866 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start!
- 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM
1030 Views
Hmm...
- 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM
1033 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference...
- 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM
1110 Views
But I'm not
- 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM
989 Views
Let me ask you this...
- 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM
1037 Views
All assumption
- 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM
930 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
- 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
857 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all
- 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM
998 Views
Why?
- 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM
1519 Views
Re: Why?
- 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM
895 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
884 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM
891 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then?
- 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM
1005 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed.
- 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM
887 Views
Yeah... entirely
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
851 Views
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
851 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM*
- 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM
600 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM
973 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity??
- 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
976 Views
Seems good, except I'd bunch up the upper levels and place Nynaeve a little higher. *NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:46:16 PM
493 Views
Too many levels
- 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM
962 Views
21 levels is largely a myth
- 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM
889 Views
Re: 21 levels is largely a myth
- 20/11/2009 01:51:17 PM
982 Views
That's good to know.
- 20/11/2009 07:56:41 PM
835 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons.
- 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM
1000 Views
I thought of something else to support my upper limit theory on gateways
- 20/11/2009 01:53:05 PM
1014 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve
- 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM
1103 Views
more hopefully to come
- 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM
812 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask.
- 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM
1063 Views
I'm the same way. I should be studying for law school finals, but I'm distracted. *NM*
- 20/11/2009 09:45:46 PM
403 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken
- 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM
822 Views
