Another thing Brandon confirmed in that brief discussion while he was setting up his laptop to show the few people who remained behind after the signing some WoK concept art is that RJ indeed did not compare strength between men and women (for the usual reasons RJ told us, Brandon confirmed). He kept two separate lists and two separate "quick guides".
I think that we have to take RJ at his word when he says functionally a women is the equal to a man despite the individual quirks of saidin and saidar, and just assume that an effect which may require more saidin to perform may very well require less saidar to execute.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 04:12:35 PM
1937 Views
Except...
- 19/11/2009 04:26:32 PM
960 Views
There's no evidence for that
- 19/11/2009 04:31:17 PM
901 Views
I agree with Sidious - we have no evidence at this time, so she should remain off the list
- 19/11/2009 04:38:31 PM
912 Views
It's common sense
- 19/11/2009 04:40:01 PM
833 Views
No, it's based on absolutely nothing
- 19/11/2009 04:50:30 PM
964 Views
If you agree that there are stronger damane than Alivia...
- 19/11/2009 05:00:05 PM
833 Views
Glad to have you back. Now for the arguments to start!
- 19/11/2009 04:29:01 PM
988 Views
Hmm...
- 19/11/2009 04:47:12 PM
991 Views
Actually, you are the one placing Lanfear immensely high, my list reduced the strength difference...
- 19/11/2009 05:05:18 PM
1078 Views
But I'm not
- 19/11/2009 05:17:05 PM
946 Views
Let me ask you this...
- 19/11/2009 10:13:12 PM
996 Views
All assumption
- 20/11/2009 04:11:20 AM
893 Views
Why introduce that concept, if it is just of academic importance?
- 20/11/2009 07:41:54 AM
818 Views
You don't know the significance of it at all
- 20/11/2009 03:14:46 PM
958 Views
Why?
- 20/11/2009 03:17:51 PM
1478 Views
Re: Why?
- 20/11/2009 04:30:50 PM
848 Views
How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 20/11/2009 05:07:39 PM
844 Views
Re: How can you argue in such a way and still keep a straight face (presumably)...
- 21/11/2009 10:55:47 AM
851 Views
Is Graendal the only Forsaken NOT to overstate her own ability then?
- 21/11/2009 01:53:28 PM
970 Views
Your rankings hinge ENTIRELY on whether you have Graendal correctly placed.
- 20/11/2009 03:24:22 PM
844 Views
Yeah... entirely
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
804 Views
- 20/11/2009 04:33:45 PM
804 Views
What ever happened to all teh info from wotmania? Especially the FAQs? *NM*
- 19/11/2009 05:01:45 PM
582 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post
- 19/11/2009 05:39:10 PM
933 Views
Re: Female Forsaken strength : a new post -- What about Dexterity??
- 19/11/2009 06:44:31 PM
928 Views
Seems good, except I'd bunch up the upper levels and place Nynaeve a little higher. *NM*
- 19/11/2009 09:46:16 PM
472 Views
Too many levels
- 20/11/2009 01:48:24 AM
928 Views
21 levels is largely a myth
- 20/11/2009 04:27:27 AM
841 Views
Re: 21 levels is largely a myth
- 20/11/2009 01:51:17 PM
942 Views
That's good to know.
- 20/11/2009 07:56:41 PM
799 Views
I have to disagree for a couple of reasons.
- 20/11/2009 04:14:40 AM
962 Views
I thought of something else to support my upper limit theory on gateways
- 20/11/2009 01:53:05 PM
979 Views
Talaan is not stronger than Nynaeve
- 28/11/2009 08:27:22 PM
1062 Views
more hopefully to come
- 20/11/2009 08:15:00 PM
774 Views
Thanks KCF, that's a great question to ask.
- 20/11/2009 08:28:32 PM
1022 Views
I'm the same way. I should be studying for law school finals, but I'm distracted. *NM*
- 20/11/2009 09:45:46 PM
387 Views
I agree that Graendal is the 2nd most powerful woman Forsaken
- 29/11/2009 04:07:00 PM
781 Views
