Active Users:1486 Time:02/08/2026 03:19:53 PM
Yes, Sidious' scale is a relative scale not an absolute one *NM* BlackAdder Send a noteboard - 18/12/2009 12:23:25 AM
First, RJ told us Egwene and co. come one step below the Forsaken and Moiraine and the strongest Aes Sedai a step below them. You completely ignore this by placing Moiraine at 25, Egwene at 40 and Moghedien at 65! A wider range of numbers called one below the other I've never seen.

Second, by placing the strongest AS at 25 and the weakest at 10, you raise some startling implications from RJ's comments on the Bell Curve.

First, 62.5% of channelers (male or female) are strong enough to be Aes Sedai by modern standards. By your placement, this means 37.5% of women are weaker than Daigian.

But if we take a bell curve distribution to the strength range of 1 to 100, this means strength range 90 to 100 will also consist of roughly 37.5% of channelers. The only way to avoid this is to have a skewed bell curve, which RJ has said the distribution is not.

The worst, though, is the assumption made that the 21 levels are not evenly distributed. Most of the lists you and Sidious come up with have AS from 10-25, with increments of 1 since we know there are a load of levels among the AS. However, there are sudden jumps when you go from Moiraine to Cadsuane and then Caddy to Egwene, and then on to the Forsaken. On exactly what basis are you making the assumption that the 21 levels are not equally distributed in the strength range of 1 to 100? Especially with a bell curve distribution showing that RJ gave a load of thought to this.

For gods sake, if the range of a bell curve is 1 to 100, then the variable will cluster around the mean, meaning the highest number of women will be of strength 50. This is a mathematical fact, not a matter of perspective. And yet, you want to place someone of as rare strength as Egwene below this point and also all of the Aes Sedai?


It is quite simple, really. In your model, the average channeler lies on 50, and the strongest possible channeler will lie on 100. Therefore, on your model, the strongest possible channeler is only double the strength of the average channeler. This is completely inconsistent with the text.

Instead, we see that the vast majority of channelers are very weak, and that everyone we see as being average strength channelers are actually very strong channelers. Even the normal Aes Sedai.

So, we know that 37.5% of women are weaker than Dagian who is say a 10 on the strength scale. Then, 12.5% of women fall between Dagian and the average woman - who is say a 15 on the strength scale.

That means, in this simple example, half of women fall below 15 which is still below the average Aes Sedai strength of 20. So this half of all women would include the Kin and all other women who are even weaker than Dagian, as well as weak Aes Sedai who fall above Dagian, but still below the average Aes Sedai strength.

To continue this example, we can then say that 62.5% of women fall below 20 - which is the average Aes Sedai strength. That would mean that 1 woman in 3 is stronger than the average Aes Sedai.

So you can see that to get to women like Nynaeve you are talking about 4 or 5 standard deviations from the mean - if the mean is 15 and Nynaeve is on 75.

Nynaeve appears to be 1 in 10 000 in terms of strength, so how many standard deviations from the mean would that be? I forget and I don't have my old textbooks handy. 3 standard deviations includes something like 97.5% of cases, and 4 standard deviations something like 99.95 of all cases. So Nynaeve might even be 5 standard deviations from the mean.

The point is, you cannot view the mean as being 50 on the strength scale. Because then you limit the strongest possible woman to being only double as strong as the average woman - which is refuted by the examples in the text.

Unless you take Egwene and Elayne to be of average strength - which is ridiculous, as they are among the strongest women in the Tower for 1000 years.

This Bell Curve cannot be centered on 50 strength, because RJ has stated that the vast majority of channelers in the Age of Legends were fairly weak, with only rare individuals being of great strength. It is the sheer numbers of channelers that allowed so many strong individuals to exist, because even though they were a very tiny percentage of the overall channelers, this small percentage still amounted to hundreds of thousands of channelers. Those who weren't of great strength, simply chose not to become Aes Sedai.

Remember, if 3% of the population could learn to channel, out of 5 to 10 billion or so that means around 100 million channelers.

And yet, according to RJ the number of Aes Sedai numbered in the hundreds of thousands to the low millions. So that's only about 1% of all possible channelers. The strongest 1%. And the Forsaken were probably the strongest 1% out of that 1%. Really the best of the best category.

So clearly, if you take the entire channeling population, the Bell Curve is centered far closer towards the bottom than to the top.

This message last edited by BlackAdder on 18/12/2009 at 12:23:39 AM
Reply to message
The relative strength in the Power of Nynaeve vs Cadsuane vs Egwene/Elayne/Aviendha - 17/12/2009 03:32:03 PM 10819 Views
I assume you're referring to EFFECTIVE strength here... - 17/12/2009 04:27:53 PM 1983 Views
Re: I assume you're referring to EFFECTIVE strength here... - 17/12/2009 05:05:18 PM 1916 Views
Fair enough but the problem is... - 17/12/2009 05:13:39 PM 1730 Views
There's one thing that does suggest Lanfear is very dextrous... - 17/12/2009 05:49:14 PM 1812 Views
Re: Fair enough but the problem is... - 17/12/2009 08:08:27 PM 1381 Views
Re: The relative strength in the Power of Nynaeve vs Cadsuane vs Egwene/Elayne/Aviendha - 17/12/2009 04:52:56 PM 2030 Views
Alivia's rings and chains angreal multiplies strength by 4 times or more... - 17/12/2009 04:57:17 PM 1728 Views
Indeed, and not only that - 17/12/2009 05:10:46 PM 1405 Views
Re: Alivia's rings and chains angreal multiplies strength by 4 times or more... - 17/12/2009 06:07:39 PM 1441 Views
Moiraine at 45 strength is way too high. She can't be that high. *NM* - 17/12/2009 07:44:50 PM 887 Views
why? - 17/12/2009 07:57:37 PM 1514 Views
Re: why? - 17/12/2009 08:11:13 PM 1575 Views
I don't think there is one scale you can put both men and women on is the point - 17/12/2009 08:21:21 PM 1544 Views
and yet RJ does - 17/12/2009 08:27:39 PM 1475 Views
Re: and yet RJ does - 17/12/2009 09:49:20 PM 1328 Views
Re: and yet RJ does - 18/12/2009 04:20:16 AM 1396 Views
No more liberty than you are taking assuming only a woman like Graendal could do it! - 18/12/2009 05:08:04 PM 1547 Views
Re: No more liberty than you are taking assuming only a woman like Graendal could do it! - 19/12/2009 11:53:24 AM 1315 Views
Re: No more liberty than you are taking assuming only a woman like Graendal could do it! - 19/12/2009 05:12:47 PM 1210 Views
Meh... - 19/12/2009 06:01:56 PM 1220 Views
Re: Meh... - 19/12/2009 06:43:58 PM 1291 Views
Re: Meh... - 19/12/2009 06:46:03 PM 1570 Views
Re: The relative strength in the Power of Nynaeve vs Cadsuane vs Egwene/Elayne/Aviendha - 17/12/2009 05:07:28 PM 1509 Views
Re: The relative strength in the Power of Nynaeve vs Cadsuane vs Egwene/Elayne/Aviendha - 17/12/2009 06:24:12 PM 1471 Views
Let's work with your figures... - 17/12/2009 06:45:46 PM 1354 Views
Re: Let's work with your figures... - 17/12/2009 07:16:49 PM 1335 Views
You have a good point about Daigian and Semirhage. That may have been a BS mistake. *NM* - 17/12/2009 07:50:25 PM 851 Views
Re: You have a good point about Daigian and Semirhage. That may have been a BS mistake. - 17/12/2009 07:59:13 PM 1430 Views
Still, it's created more questions than it has solved. - 17/12/2009 08:13:26 PM 1455 Views
the obvious answer - 17/12/2009 10:06:33 PM 1312 Views
Re: You have a good point about Daigian and Semirhage. That may have been a BS mistake. - 17/12/2009 08:14:01 PM 1338 Views
Re: two women holding Nynaeve - 17/12/2009 08:17:10 PM 1289 Views
Re: two women holding Nynaeve - 17/12/2009 08:19:34 PM 1473 Views
I personally think Nynaeve gained strength slower than most because of her block. - 17/12/2009 08:30:44 PM 1575 Views
I think all the main characters were forced - 17/12/2009 08:38:41 PM 1436 Views
agreed! - 17/12/2009 10:01:37 PM 1345 Views
but we know as late as WH that she has not reached her full potential - 17/12/2009 09:50:12 PM 1375 Views
What? Where? *NM* - 18/12/2009 04:22:36 AM 1405 Views
I'll have to dig up the quote, apologies but I'm at work and don't have the books - 18/12/2009 05:00:20 PM 1369 Views
Sorry, Path of Daggers not Winter's Heart - 20/12/2009 03:32:33 AM 1306 Views
Don't links amplify stength? - 17/12/2009 10:26:12 PM 1279 Views
The opposite, actually. - 17/12/2009 10:36:51 PM 1367 Views
What do you think of the gap between Moghedien and Semirhage in relation to - 17/12/2009 05:40:41 PM 1516 Views
Re: What do you think of the gap between Moghedien and Semirhage in relation to - 17/12/2009 08:15:58 PM 1409 Views
Agreed! *NM* - 17/12/2009 08:19:08 PM 772 Views
Re: The relative strength in the Power of Nynaeve vs Cadsuane vs Egwene/Elayne/Aviendha - 17/12/2009 06:47:23 PM 1522 Views
Except tthat Egwene herself says she has no chance against Moghedien... - 17/12/2009 06:53:18 PM 1437 Views
Re: Except tthat Egwene herself says she has no chance against Moghedien... - 17/12/2009 07:26:55 PM 1646 Views
uhm.... yes she knows - 17/12/2009 08:04:08 PM 1498 Views
Re: uhm.... yes she knows - 17/12/2009 10:24:17 PM 1378 Views
yup *NM* - 17/12/2009 10:49:51 PM 718 Views
Re: Except tthat Egwene herself says she has no chance against Moghedien... - 17/12/2009 07:28:00 PM 1451 Views
Re: Except tthat Egwene herself says she has no chance against Moghedien... - 17/12/2009 08:23:01 PM 1649 Views
Ishamael told her that she would never be strong enough to face him - 17/12/2009 09:52:47 PM 1397 Views
And Ishamael was killed be a shepherd and Bel'al balefired by a "weak" Aes Sedai. - 17/12/2009 10:33:41 PM 1400 Views
I hope that's not your standard for dueling - 18/12/2009 04:24:09 AM 1350 Views
what you expect a Channeler to announce themselves and - 19/12/2009 12:47:17 AM 1354 Views
How can we be certain Egwene was at full strength when she said that? - 17/12/2009 07:58:39 PM 1307 Views
agreed - 17/12/2009 08:00:40 PM 1287 Views
Didn't the glossary say that Cadsuane was not far behind Eg/El? *NM* - 17/12/2009 08:05:32 PM 781 Views
I'll check *NM* - 17/12/2009 08:28:57 PM 723 Views
This thread has achieved absolutely nothing. When people don't accept quotes, what's the use... - 17/12/2009 10:22:45 PM 1404 Views
No people just interpret things differently - 17/12/2009 10:56:45 PM 1222 Views
But you ignore RJ's own quotes... who're you to talk? - 17/12/2009 11:13:40 PM 1160 Views
You also forget something. - 17/12/2009 11:36:50 PM 1270 Views
Re: You also forget something. - 17/12/2009 11:43:50 PM 1272 Views
Re: You also forget something. - 18/12/2009 02:09:08 AM 1300 Views
That has nothing to do with what I said... - 18/12/2009 12:21:06 AM 1287 Views
Re: That has nothing to do with what I said... - 18/12/2009 01:28:53 PM 1185 Views
Dude, prove it in a random sample, not in a skewed sample like "women who want to be Aes Sedai". - 18/12/2009 05:43:22 PM 1237 Views
Show me a random sample in the series that we can use *NM* - 18/12/2009 06:45:08 PM 1198 Views
I cannot. That's the point... - 18/12/2009 08:33:38 PM 1252 Views
Re: I cannot. That's the point... - 19/12/2009 11:58:39 AM 1280 Views
Sorry, but no... - 19/12/2009 06:23:41 PM 1279 Views
The One Power Bell Curve's average strength is not 50, it is more like 15... - 17/12/2009 11:41:48 PM 1769 Views
but you are the person quantifying the actual strength levels. - 18/12/2009 12:09:08 AM 1267 Views
Yes, Sidious' scale is a relative scale not an absolute one *NM* - 18/12/2009 12:23:25 AM 1191 Views
In a Bell curve, mean=median=mode. I suppose that is untrue now? - 18/12/2009 12:37:47 AM 1210 Views
Re: In a Bell curve, mean=median=mode. I suppose that is untrue now? - 18/12/2009 12:47:52 AM 1264 Views
What do you mean, relative scale? - 18/12/2009 12:53:29 AM 1187 Views
Re: What do you mean, relative scale? - 18/12/2009 01:16:53 AM 1152 Views
Re: What do you mean, relative scale? - 18/12/2009 01:40:33 AM 1262 Views
OK, I have no interest in OP Strength, but you comments about statistics and bell curve got me - 18/12/2009 12:20:27 AM 1267 Views
1 to 100 works perfectly well as a range... - 18/12/2009 12:47:44 AM 1162 Views
Here is an example with an absolute scale, converted to relative - 18/12/2009 01:03:38 AM 1361 Views
The Tower is not the whole range of channeler population! - 18/12/2009 01:28:38 AM 1309 Views
Re: The Tower is not the whole range of channeler population! - 18/12/2009 02:03:00 AM 1374 Views
Re: The Tower is not the whole range of channeler population! - 18/12/2009 03:16:25 AM 1331 Views
You're right, and that proves my point - here are the calculations and the evidence... - 18/12/2009 07:51:26 AM 1315 Views
Dude, read up on some statistics, then we'll continue this debate... - 18/12/2009 06:05:26 PM 1206 Views
Explain one thing to me... - 18/12/2009 10:40:00 PM 1240 Views
Who said she's stronger than two very strong AS? Silviana can shield her alone! *NM* - 18/12/2009 11:01:01 PM 682 Views
Aviendha said so in FoH. It is a direct quote. - 18/12/2009 11:04:21 PM 1199 Views
This is why I have a hard time with anyone using too many - 19/12/2009 12:22:40 AM 1226 Views
Can you provide the quote? - 19/12/2009 06:24:40 PM 1150 Views
Well, I was curious so I went and found it - 26/12/2009 08:59:46 PM 1353 Views
which is also suspect - 19/12/2009 12:04:14 AM 1254 Views
No it's not - 19/12/2009 12:04:21 PM 1218 Views
we're in agreement - 19/12/2009 05:22:34 PM 1180 Views
OK, the Tower AS don't fall into a bell-curve, then. - 18/12/2009 10:34:16 PM 1249 Views
So, RJ made that statement for what reason? - 18/12/2009 11:03:30 PM 1209 Views
I don't think it's a lie - 18/12/2009 11:19:41 PM 1270 Views
Agreed - 18/12/2009 01:04:14 PM 1219 Views
Re: But you ignore RJ's own quotes... who're you to talk? - 18/12/2009 04:31:53 AM 1212 Views
Re: But you ignore RJ's own quotes... who're you to talk? - 18/12/2009 04:42:33 AM 1178 Views
Re: But you ignore RJ's own quotes... who're you to talk? - 18/12/2009 01:04:39 PM 1247 Views
Bell curves CANNOT be skewed! - 18/12/2009 06:06:15 PM 1292 Views
I've discussed this before... - 18/12/2009 01:06:07 AM 1300 Views
Re: I've discussed this before... - 18/12/2009 04:37:30 AM 1317 Views
Re: I've discussed this before... - 18/12/2009 04:58:48 AM 1273 Views
Egwene + Lelaine + Romanda is weaker than one male Forsaken...according to Egwene herself... - 18/12/2009 07:02:28 AM 1299 Views
Why are you entertaining this? - 18/12/2009 01:19:25 PM 1238 Views
Re: Egwene + Lelaine + Romanda is weaker than one male Forsaken...according to Egwene herself... - 19/12/2009 12:46:18 AM 1254 Views
I can't imagine it being about skill - 19/12/2009 12:06:42 PM 1280 Views
of course it's about skill - 19/12/2009 05:22:45 PM 1275 Views
Not it isn't! - 19/12/2009 05:52:02 PM 1297 Views
I always thought that without her angreal... - 18/12/2009 06:27:07 AM 1391 Views
Egwene, Elayne, and Aviendha are equally matched. - 18/12/2009 07:47:03 AM 1489 Views

Reply to Message