Active Users:1694 Time:01/08/2026 11:45:41 PM
Re: It just occured to me Mysteria Indictus Send a noteboard - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM
Isn't it a bit curious that many Aes Sedai demand of lesser people that they are called by their name and the "honorific Sedai". After all, many or most Aes Sedai and other educated people should know that "sedai" just means "servant" in the Old Tongue. That basically means an Aes Sedai e.g. wants to be properly adressed by a servant/novice as "Servant Lelaine", "Servant Elaida" or "Servant Cadsuane", for example. On the other hand, it's said that a character like Nynaeve often tries to make a point by never adding the honorific Sedai to the name, though that only means that she doesn't call the Aes Sedai servant.


Heh, very true.

But of course, the Aes Sedai of the AoL were proud to serve, so they probably found the title honorific. And the Third Age people probably just carried on the tradition, thinking the OT sounds fancy. A bit as if we internet people would demand to be called by our names and the latin word for "geek". By the way, if someone could enlighten me to what that word might be, I'd be grateful.
//Mysteria Indictus
Previously known as NightShade
Gleeman of the Page of Legends
Reply to message
It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 10:12:12 AM 1662 Views
I tink they did - 31/12/2009 10:52:32 AM 958 Views
Re: It just occured to me - 31/12/2009 11:07:29 AM 914 Views
Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 11:34:49 AM 882 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 02:20:32 PM 761 Views
In a democracy though... - 31/12/2009 02:38:21 PM 769 Views
Re: Yeah, if you compare it to the Catholic Church... - 31/12/2009 04:30:58 PM 804 Views
Depends on what the actual translation is... - 31/12/2009 04:49:54 PM 770 Views
The translation... - 31/12/2009 06:17:07 PM 789 Views
Look at M'Hael - 31/12/2009 08:12:35 PM 809 Views
No... - 31/12/2009 08:19:18 PM 750 Views
And Sedai is not a title? - 31/12/2009 08:47:03 PM 855 Views
Nope, it is an honorific. - 31/12/2009 09:31:37 PM 925 Views
You're really splitting hairs... - 01/01/2010 04:06:02 PM 1031 Views
That's why I said I was. - 01/01/2010 06:19:22 PM 934 Views
My 2 cents... which may only be worth 1 - 01/01/2010 06:39:52 PM 926 Views
I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 06:49:25 PM 933 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:27:57 PM 879 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 07:37:17 PM 883 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 08:08:58 PM 907 Views
Re: I'll cash that check, but I doubt my bank will care much. - 01/01/2010 09:05:45 PM 887 Views
I think we're pretty much in agreement - 01/01/2010 09:26:26 PM 905 Views
I'd agree with that. - 01/01/2010 10:20:52 PM 865 Views
I think it's a pride of humility thing.... - 31/12/2009 06:24:17 PM 832 Views
They don't care. The meaning of the honorific is irrelevant - all significance comes from context - 01/01/2010 06:08:40 AM 815 Views
I Agree - 01/01/2010 08:36:40 AM 759 Views
Re: I Agree - 01/01/2010 03:04:18 PM 747 Views

Reply to Message