Active Users:1163 Time:13/11/2026 01:04:41 PM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2771 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1497 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1378 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1323 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 1237 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 1159 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4901 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 1148 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 1203 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 1120 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 1110 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 1112 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 1076 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 1178 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 1254 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 1114 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 1221 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1307 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 1111 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 593 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 1141 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 1092 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 1062 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1331 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 1152 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 1214 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 1209 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 591 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1357 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 1246 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 1132 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 1168 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 1220 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 1091 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 1163 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 576 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 1063 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 1071 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 614 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 579 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 1138 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 1201 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 1180 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 1088 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 1071 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1306 Views

Reply to Message