Active Users:798 Time:05/08/2025 05:02:17 PM
Clearly dead Etzel Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM
RJ came up with this "elegant" and quick way to get rid of the clever Graendal by Rand's use of brute force. I really don't see what the point would be, if Graendal somehow managed to survive, is still around and Rand has to come up with an even better idea to outsmart Graendal. Seems like a pointless twist, which further burdens the plot.

Graendal's PoV in the prologue also wasn't redundant, because it gave us e.g. more clues about Moridin's plans and situation. It also explains why Graendal didn't dare to immediately flee from Arad Doman, when Rand arrived. She had to stay and make contact with him eventually.

BS indicated as well that Graendal is dead by saying that she will just be mentioned a few times in ToM, and that ToM will make it clear, if she is dead.

Besides this, Semirhage's and Elza's ter'angreal bracelets remained, when Rand hit them with balefire on the chest. Considering this one wonders, if Graendal's angreal was even balefired, since Rand just aimed at the palace.
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2423 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1174 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1040 Views
Nynaeve's boat... - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1007 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 886 Views
Good point ... - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 856 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4582 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 842 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 859 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 777 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 809 Views
BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 823 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 797 Views
There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 845 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 881 Views
Re: There is another way... - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 792 Views
Nope - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 877 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 998 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 823 Views
Exactly! *NM* - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 432 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 846 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 760 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 709 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1021 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 860 Views
Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 877 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 857 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 430 Views
Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1020 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 890 Views
Re: Clearly dead - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 836 Views
I think... - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 849 Views
No way. - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 920 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 787 Views
Re: No way. - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 834 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 417 Views
She's dead as dead gets. - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 769 Views
Dead is my bet - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 793 Views
She's dead *NM* - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 399 Views
Dead. *NM* - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 405 Views
I think she's alive. - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 805 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 903 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 857 Views
What if.. - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 760 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 784 Views
Well... - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 989 Views

Reply to Message