Active Users:343 Time:17/06/2025 11:50:00 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Good point ... Shishka Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM
Nynaeve's boat in aCoS proves nothing. It moved back a hundred paces because the oarsmen were balefired.


Ah yes, you're right. That wasn't something I had thought about until I started replying to randfandom's post - I should have thought about it more before replying. :<img class=' />

If the boat had a thread, one part of it being balefired would have meant the whole boat would be balefired. That did not happen.


Also a good point. This reminds of something I had though about at one time or another, with respect to objects having threads (which I'd forgotten about until just now). If objects have threads, then each component of the boat (hull plank, sail, rudder, etc.) should have had a thread before the boat was constructed. Do they all combine into one thread, when the various components are combined to construct the boat? Or do they remain individual threads?

Much easier to associate threads with living bodies (I'd say souls, but RJ said that soulless, living bodies still have threads).

Except ... as the DO causes the Pattern to unravel, we see how it affects buildings/hallways/etc., and not just people. So, those buildings/hallways/etc. are a part of the Pattern, it would seem, and therefore the theory that they also have threads becomes a little more substantial, I think.

I'm sure that the coat scene in tGS was a mistake, and BS was mistaken when he said objects had threads.


Could be, but I'm defintitely not "sure".
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2398 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) randfandom - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1152 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1019 Views
Nynaeve's boat... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 988 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 868 Views
Good point ... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 839 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4566 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 825 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 838 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 759 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 789 Views
BS is definitely wrong here BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 807 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 780 Views
There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 826 Views
Re: There is another way... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 863 Views
Re: There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 777 Views
Nope randfandom - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 859 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 980 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 806 Views
Exactly! *NM* fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 424 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 831 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 743 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 686 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1005 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? BlackAdder - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 846 Views
Balefire is so confusing Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 860 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 838 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* lilltempest - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 420 Views
Clearly dead Etzel - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1008 Views
Re: Clearly dead Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 873 Views
Re: Clearly dead Datakim - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 822 Views
I think... Etzel - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 832 Views
No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 901 Views
Re: No way. Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 767 Views
Re: No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 813 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 408 Views
She's dead as dead gets. everynametaken - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 749 Views
Dead is my bet Sidious - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 774 Views
She's dead *NM* Simon - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 390 Views
Dead. *NM* AgentOrange - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 393 Views
I think she's alive. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 789 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? Syraelle - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 879 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer Gher - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 841 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM 779 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM 814 Views
What if.. Tweak - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 745 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive Wotmaniac Reborn - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 765 Views
Well... Heiko - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 970 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes