Active Users:928 Time:07/02/2026 06:51:55 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM
Then again, they'd have to, since otherwise time wouldn't flow in places where there are no living things... Confusing, a bit.


It seems you equate "time flow" with "threads", which I'm not sure I understand.

Regardless though, when we see the Brown Ajah section of the WT switch places with the Novice section, we see physical objects (wall stones, floor tiles, tapestries, etc.) MOVE with respect to other objects. And it's hard for me to imagine how that could occur (given my admittedly limited understanding of what the Pattern actually is) if those objects didn't have threads.

Anyway, as to balefire affecting objects, I'm pretty sure it doesn't - we have several examples of balefiring objects and the things on top of them falling to the ground, such as Rand against Rahvin (The Threads Burn) or Jeaine Caide wielding that balefire ter'angreal in the Panarch's Palace (Into the Palace). If objects were balefired back in time, those things would already be on the ground.


By "affecting", I guess you mean that balefire doesn't cause objects to cease to exist backwards in time. I'd have to go back and read the examples you cited to be sure, but I assume you're right about them. Seems a bit odd that object threads would react differently to balefire than living threads, but if that's the way it is, who am I to argue?
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2562 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) randfandom - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1309 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1154 Views
Nynaeve's boat... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1130 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 1029 Views
Good point ... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 973 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4703 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 956 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 1009 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 927 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 908 Views
BS is definitely wrong here BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 924 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 898 Views
There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 987 Views
Re: There is another way... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 1017 Views
Re: There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 928 Views
Nope randfandom - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 993 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1115 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 940 Views
Exactly! *NM* fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 495 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 951 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 879 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 839 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1142 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? BlackAdder - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 985 Views
Balefire is so confusing Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 1019 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 1001 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* lilltempest - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 496 Views
Clearly dead Etzel - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1162 Views
Re: Clearly dead Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 1020 Views
Re: Clearly dead Datakim - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 941 Views
I think... Etzel - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 986 Views
No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 1037 Views
Re: No way. Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 913 Views
Re: No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 978 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 472 Views
She's dead as dead gets. everynametaken - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 878 Views
Dead is my bet Sidious - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 893 Views
She's dead *NM* Simon - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 466 Views
Dead. *NM* AgentOrange - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 474 Views
I think she's alive. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 932 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? Syraelle - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 1027 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer Gher - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 980 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM 914 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM 964 Views
What if.. Tweak - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 887 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive Wotmaniac Reborn - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 880 Views
Well... Heiko - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1126 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes