Active Users:602 Time:18/12/2025 04:14:51 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka Send a noteboard - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM
Then again, they'd have to, since otherwise time wouldn't flow in places where there are no living things... Confusing, a bit.


It seems you equate "time flow" with "threads", which I'm not sure I understand.

Regardless though, when we see the Brown Ajah section of the WT switch places with the Novice section, we see physical objects (wall stones, floor tiles, tapestries, etc.) MOVE with respect to other objects. And it's hard for me to imagine how that could occur (given my admittedly limited understanding of what the Pattern actually is) if those objects didn't have threads.

Anyway, as to balefire affecting objects, I'm pretty sure it doesn't - we have several examples of balefiring objects and the things on top of them falling to the ground, such as Rand against Rahvin (The Threads Burn) or Jeaine Caide wielding that balefire ter'angreal in the Panarch's Palace (Into the Palace). If objects were balefired back in time, those things would already be on the ground.


By "affecting", I guess you mean that balefire doesn't cause objects to cease to exist backwards in time. I'd have to go back and read the examples you cited to be sure, but I assume you're right about them. Seems a bit odd that object threads would react differently to balefire than living threads, but if that's the way it is, who am I to argue?
Rise and fall, turn the Wheel,
'cause all life is
is really just a circle.

-BHT&tM
Reply to message
Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 05:44:12 PM 2521 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) randfandom - 05/01/2010 06:46:19 PM 1260 Views
Re: Graendal's Fate (Alive or Dead?) Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:15:41 PM 1128 Views
Nynaeve's boat... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:23:57 PM 1096 Views
Balefire is REALLY confusing. Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:41:05 PM 990 Views
Good point ... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:52:04 PM 934 Views
I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 08:45:52 PM 4671 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Shishka - 05/01/2010 09:23:06 PM 925 Views
Re: I'm somewhat surprised objects have threads. Fanatic-Templar - 05/01/2010 10:30:42 PM 972 Views
Wasn't there a quote somewhere BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:05:32 AM 892 Views
Probably a bit of retconning there by Brandon Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:34:55 PM 870 Views
BS is definitely wrong here BlackAdder - 06/01/2010 02:01:23 AM 894 Views
Re: BS is definitely wrong here Lord Haart - 06/01/2010 03:36:06 PM 864 Views
There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 07:00:31 PM 952 Views
Re: There is another way... Shishka - 05/01/2010 07:35:05 PM 979 Views
Re: There is another way... fionwe1987 - 05/01/2010 11:05:26 PM 898 Views
Nope randfandom - 06/01/2010 04:36:56 AM 963 Views
USe Occam's Razor yourself... fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:53:22 AM 1091 Views
and why didn't she invert any of the weaves? darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 05:55:54 AM 912 Views
Exactly! *NM* fionwe1987 - 06/01/2010 05:27:52 PM 480 Views
Maybe you cannot invert compulsion? Datakim - 06/01/2010 06:56:35 PM 915 Views
so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? seems a little darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:31:09 PM 847 Views
Re: so it's the one and only thing we've seen that can't be inverted? Datakim - 07/01/2010 12:02:00 AM 805 Views
I am inclined to agree with Datakim here. Fanatic-Templar - 07/01/2010 02:04:42 AM 1113 Views
Why aren't inverted weaves standard practice? BlackAdder - 07/01/2010 01:24:09 AM 947 Views
Balefire is so confusing Datakim - 05/01/2010 07:03:29 PM 981 Views
Re: Balefire is so confusing Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:52:57 PM 970 Views
She's dead as a bloody doornail. Or whatever that saying is... *NM* lilltempest - 05/01/2010 07:20:36 PM 485 Views
Clearly dead Etzel - 05/01/2010 07:29:11 PM 1109 Views
Re: Clearly dead Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:21:16 PM 989 Views
Re: Clearly dead Datakim - 05/01/2010 08:41:15 PM 911 Views
I think... Etzel - 05/01/2010 09:05:48 PM 961 Views
No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 07:31:12 PM 1005 Views
Re: No way. Shishka - 05/01/2010 08:31:54 PM 884 Views
Re: No way. Gher - 05/01/2010 10:16:03 PM 942 Views
Graendal's as dead as BS/RJ makes her. *NM* Great Lord of Chaos - 06/01/2010 02:40:46 AM 460 Views
She's dead as dead gets. everynametaken - 06/01/2010 01:43:34 AM 845 Views
Dead is my bet Sidious - 06/01/2010 11:48:46 AM 861 Views
She's dead *NM* Simon - 06/01/2010 11:58:34 AM 456 Views
Dead. *NM* AgentOrange - 06/01/2010 03:58:19 PM 462 Views
I think she's alive. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 06/01/2010 06:12:50 PM 893 Views
Compulsion is rather useless isn't it? Syraelle - 06/01/2010 07:44:42 PM 997 Views
It may take an exceptional Delver/Healer Gher - 06/01/2010 08:49:37 PM 944 Views
perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! darius_sedai - 06/01/2010 11:06:49 PM 883 Views
Re: perhaps, but still I have a hard time believing Graendal didn't invert the weaves! RugbyPlayingAshaman - 07/01/2010 03:42:17 PM 928 Views
What if.. Tweak - 06/01/2010 10:41:44 PM 855 Views
I'll roll my eyes, and snort if she's alive Wotmaniac Reborn - 08/01/2010 04:21:20 AM 848 Views
Well... Heiko - 10/01/2010 03:24:39 AM 1083 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes