Active Users:585 Time:13/06/2026 02:29:13 PM
Ahhh, but... fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 04/02/2010 06:22:46 AM
<quote id="77935"
Even if they were close allies, Aran'gar wouldn't be there all the time. Sammael and Graendal were closely tied but he used to visit her once every few days or even every few weeks. The chances that Aran'gar would be in the palace in that hour would be rather small.
There are two issues here...

1) Aran'gar was ousted from the Rebel camp, and had nowhere to go. She was sexually interested in Graendal, not just as an ally. Staying with her is at least a possibility. It is also possible Graendal lured him/her and compelled the stunningly beautiful and unique Aran'gar to be her pet.

2) Another issue is... what if, as I claim, Graendal planned this out? Then she'd know to expect Rand, and may have kept Aran'gar around to warn her when he comes.
Reply to message
So your name is Graendal... - 03/02/2010 04:38:42 PM 1509 Views
First off.... - 03/02/2010 04:51:46 PM 788 Views
Re: First off.... - 03/02/2010 05:09:06 PM 570 Views
Nice - 03/02/2010 05:46:45 PM 674 Views
Well we know she has a weather/temperature warding screen around her palace - 03/02/2010 05:58:27 PM 581 Views
Not really - 03/02/2010 06:02:27 PM 563 Views
Re: Not really - 03/02/2010 06:12:05 PM 699 Views
There's one other possibility... - 03/02/2010 11:42:25 PM 662 Views
But... - 04/02/2010 01:03:05 AM 550 Views
Nope... - 04/02/2010 06:19:56 AM 727 Views
Point granted. - 04/02/2010 06:56:19 AM 729 Views
Read the books - 04/02/2010 03:47:23 PM 697 Views
- 04/02/2010 06:13:00 PM 720 Views
- 04/02/2010 06:35:27 PM 640 Views
Yeah, that's why I figured I'd post my Sidious wish-fulfillment theory below . - 04/02/2010 07:44:22 PM 690 Views
Thanks! And I just copy pasted... - 04/02/2010 09:03:21 PM 542 Views
Is it really that plausible? - 04/02/2010 04:18:25 AM 562 Views
Ahhh, but... - 04/02/2010 06:22:46 AM 641 Views
Re: Ahhh, but... - 04/02/2010 06:40:40 PM 563 Views
So your name is Robert Jordan - 03/02/2010 05:53:43 PM 874 Views
But unfortunately and tragically... - 03/02/2010 06:01:15 PM 645 Views
This thought is so grotesque... - 03/02/2010 07:20:20 PM 610 Views
Re: This thought is so grotesque... - 03/02/2010 07:40:01 PM 607 Views
Actually no Forsaken has ever beaten or outsmarted Rand in a confrontation before. - 03/02/2010 08:50:41 PM 619 Views
Uhhh... - 03/02/2010 09:01:57 PM 725 Views
Yeah, but... - 03/02/2010 09:21:51 PM 581 Views
But I think you're misreading the rules of the game. - 03/02/2010 09:31:40 PM 539 Views
Rand considers... - 04/02/2010 10:10:59 AM 524 Views
I don't think.... - 04/02/2010 06:11:03 PM 703 Views
O_O - 03/02/2010 09:25:17 PM 566 Views
Yeah, and this is exactly what we see when Rand kills Graendal with a force of light. *NM* - 03/02/2010 09:29:08 PM 223 Views
When Rand thinks that he kills.... - 03/02/2010 09:34:41 PM 572 Views
He defeats every Forsaken because he doesn't play their game - 04/02/2010 04:23:23 AM 672 Views
I agree. *NM* - 04/02/2010 10:11:51 AM 639 Views
I think there is a sexual dynamic here - 04/02/2010 04:45:49 PM 551 Views
Bingo - 03/02/2010 06:03:19 PM 640 Views
That is not true.. - 03/02/2010 11:50:18 PM 700 Views
This was a typical... - 04/02/2010 10:17:56 AM 522 Views
There was nothing typical about it! - 04/02/2010 08:48:16 PM 661 Views
Rand wasn't at all afraid of Graendal - 04/02/2010 09:22:53 PM 622 Views
Of course he was! Even Nynaeve and Min noticed! - 04/02/2010 09:32:52 PM 685 Views
Re: That is not true.. - 04/02/2010 03:57:56 PM 782 Views
But RJ/BS brike convention in this book... - 04/02/2010 08:52:44 PM 705 Views
So your name is Basel Gill. - 04/02/2010 12:53:13 AM 588 Views
So your name is Sidious - 04/02/2010 12:57:46 AM 681 Views
Just use the TARDIS. *NM* - 04/02/2010 05:04:52 AM 346 Views
Re: So your name is Sidious - 04/02/2010 03:48:52 PM 542 Views
You're offering me a throne? Thanks Siddy, you're my favourite archnemesis! - 04/02/2010 06:16:54 PM 644 Views
A throne of beetles - 04/02/2010 06:35:58 PM 580 Views
How exactly do you fashion a throne out of live beetles? - 04/02/2010 07:46:42 PM 584 Views

Reply to Message