Active Users:412 Time:26/04/2024 06:46:50 PM
Fair enough.... Jeordam Send a noteboard - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM

Rand could see Asmo through the window from his location in the Caemlyn Palace as well, before Asmo walked away to get wine. It's also explicitely told in the books that Slayer spies on people. When Slayer saw that Asmo went in a certain direction, he jumbed there via TAR (as said, Slayer most likely knows the Palace quite well) and had the luck that Asmo apparently opened the first door on his way. Thus Slayer got the perfect opportunity to kill Asmo, especially since the Palace was largely deserted at this time. If Asmo wouldn't have opened the door, Slayer had simply waited for another chance to get Asmo.

In my view that makes more sense than e.g. the idea that Graendal randomly wandered in this part of the Palace for some obscure reason and without any disguise.


He was spying on him. Had the time/opportunity to jump into the dream world...run down the hall....get back out of the dreamworld....and Asmodean should have picked door number three. So then the question comes around to who commissioned Slayer to act?

As per Graendal wandering around the Palace herself. Well we know from this very book that she had a whole scheme brewing with Rhavin, Sammael, and Lanfear so she very well could have been in the palace. Why didn't she have a disguise? Well she just witnessed Rhavin's smack-down with Rand. She knew that there was a female channeler in the Palace, and that any channeling remotely near Rand would alert him of something going on. Would you risk disguising yourself?

There are just a few things for Slayer that just don't add up. Not that I really consider author-speak canon, but RJ said that we knew the character who killed Asmodean. And that we knew of that character by that book. We had no idea who "slayer" was, and for all we knew, he was dead after Perrin shot him. We had no idea he was the shadow's gun-for-hire.

And then the MO for Slayer isn't the same as his typical. Asmodean disappeared without a trace. No blood, no body, no harp...nothing. Yes, you could say that Slayer was ordered to not leave any evidence, but again, to what conclusion? The Forsaken who ordered the hit wanted it to look like a mystery? Oddly enough, I see the Forsaken making an example of anyone who betrayed them, let alone anyone who was weak. The example of this type of hit, which Slayer did do, would be the two Black Ajah sisters in the Stone of Tear. I mean, if the Forsaken wanted to really cause Rand issues, they could have rigged it so that the whole world found out that Rand's bard was the Forsaken Asmodean. That would have caused *major* issues with his allies. Instead, not a peep out of anyone...and we've seen each and every Forsaken who is still alive since then. The only bit of whatever that we have seen is that Graendal had her lips sealed when Sammael brought it up.

~Jeordam
ex-Admin at wotmania (all things wot & art galleries)
Saving the Princess, Humanity, or the World-Entire since 1985
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1726 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 507 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 518 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 516 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 399 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 537 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 457 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 187 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 324 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 356 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 389 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 392 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 371 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 383 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 370 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 357 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 359 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 376 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 346 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 394 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 401 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 374 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 356 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 387 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 388 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 348 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 365 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 393 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 331 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 382 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 345 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 390 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 196 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 425 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 352 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 334 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 319 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 437 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 181 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 355 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 355 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 337 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 385 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 345 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 444 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 349 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 340 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 193 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 344 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 304 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 311 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 323 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 315 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 322 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 323 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 340 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 321 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 305 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 403 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 302 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 325 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 312 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 323 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 154 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 320 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 150 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 322 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 334 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 367 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 167 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 143 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 344 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 320 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 369 Views

Reply to Message