Active Users:387 Time:01/05/2025 06:03:30 PM
You dont address all the criteria saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM
You should consider and address all of RJ's criteria:

IO -- RJ explained what he meant--as per RJ, IO is based upon considering where everyone was, what they were thinking, what they were doing. Emphasis was on where everyone was.

Opportunity--RJ emphasized OPPORTUNITY provided/caused by the TIMING of events. he emphasized this over motive.

How he died AND where he died- Not one or the other, both factors.

Popular ideas between 1998 and 2005 were wrong. This throws out the most widely accepted ideas and suspects. Between 2003 and 2005 only one website got it right and with the correct reasoning; and the site also provided a comprehensive list and analysis.

I'm worried that i missed some of RJ's criteria. Anybody have any more?

i like the way you think so i'd like to see you address each of the above.

Here is the link to find the quotes for the above http://docs.google.com/View?docID=dcjspjqg_820f85qwbd6&revision=_latest
This message last edited by saidarisnowtainted on 31/03/2010 at 12:12:20 AM
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1846 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 645 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 661 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 666 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 523 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 700 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 591 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 245 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 390 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 487 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 518 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 516 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 501 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 511 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 506 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 458 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 492 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 496 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 480 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 531 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 530 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 505 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 490 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 513 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 512 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 480 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 493 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 524 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 475 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 507 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 470 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 524 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 250 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 556 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 483 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 453 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 442 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 575 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 230 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 490 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 490 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 496 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 484 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 471 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 577 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 492 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 474 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 241 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 469 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 425 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 421 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 453 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 443 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 463 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 448 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 475 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 449 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 443 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 532 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 430 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 465 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 440 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 453 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 204 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 449 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 203 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 447 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 463 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 503 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 221 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 194 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 468 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 435 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 495 Views

Reply to Message