Active Users:392 Time:01/05/2025 12:11:42 PM
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM
someone would have had to send him ... which we cannot know prior to the events of LOC is part of how things work with Slayer. His involvement adds another layer to the mystery

such as:

1. how would anyone know where to find Asmo in the first place? The crime is way too opportunistic for to have been planned out.

2. why would any of the FS bother to send Slayer after Asmo? There is no gain in it for them to kill him off via the use of Slayer. Sure seeing him dead would be good for them, but ultimately it seems like a lot of work just to kill him off.

3. RJ foreshadowed it being one of the FS earlier in the book when Asmo tells Rand that any of the FS "would kill him on sight"

Slayer as the killer feels like a red herring to me ... seems obvious at first, but once you do even the smallest digging the whole house of cards collapses.

Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 22/03/2010 01:53:54 AM 1844 Views
idle speculation != "Intuitivly obvious" - 22/03/2010 03:01:10 AM 644 Views
The best explanation for the "intuitively obvious"-comment is... - 22/03/2010 09:41:32 AM 659 Views
So again...how would Slayer know he was in the hallway? - 22/03/2010 03:18:51 PM 666 Views
I think Slayer spied on Asmo - 22/03/2010 03:45:20 PM 522 Views
Fair enough.... - 22/03/2010 06:25:25 PM 700 Views
I think... - 23/03/2010 09:31:41 AM 589 Views
I agree. Slayer is the most intuitively obvious candidate. *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:29:07 PM 244 Views
Slayer....the book4 minor villian? *NM* - 22/03/2010 06:34:52 PM 390 Views
Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 23/03/2010 09:11:39 AM 485 Views
Re: Slayer actually was a major villian in TSR. - 28/03/2010 07:16:59 PM 516 Views
In my view, Graendal might have sent Slayer, which would explain her knowledge. *NM* - 29/03/2010 09:45:14 AM 516 Views
Actually that's one of my hang-ups about Slayer too - 06/04/2010 02:27:22 PM 499 Views
As far as I'm concerned... - 25/03/2010 06:42:53 AM 510 Views
The problem is that people don't read the books or at least ignore what is said about Slayer... - 25/03/2010 09:41:09 AM 504 Views
Correction... - 25/03/2010 05:22:46 PM 455 Views
So, basically... - 25/03/2010 05:50:42 PM 489 Views
The clues are there? - 25/03/2010 06:29:16 PM 496 Views
Re: The clues are there? - 26/03/2010 12:51:43 AM 478 Views
He wasn't being insulting, I don't think. - 26/03/2010 02:16:26 AM 530 Views
well, RJ was a nuclear engineer. 'Nuff said about obviousness, huh? - 26/03/2010 04:38:00 AM 527 Views
Apparently... - 26/03/2010 08:58:32 AM 503 Views
No it isn't. - 26/03/2010 05:43:02 PM 489 Views
You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 09:11:35 AM 513 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 27/03/2010 05:23:35 PM 512 Views
Re: You don't understand... - 28/03/2010 08:17:40 PM 480 Views
Yes, it's Winter's Heart. - 29/03/2010 04:01:41 AM 492 Views
Both merged into one being - 29/03/2010 09:43:47 AM 524 Views
Not what I asked. - 29/03/2010 06:10:42 PM 473 Views
If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 06:59:16 PM 505 Views
Re: If he couldn't do this... - 29/03/2010 07:46:39 PM 468 Views
That Basel Gill comparison just silly... - 29/03/2010 08:49:19 PM 522 Views
Clearly, one of you has proved that Basel Gill is Demandred *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:12:00 PM 250 Views
I've asked you only one question, repeatedly. - 30/03/2010 12:34:44 AM 555 Views
Yeah, and I repeatedly tried to show you the clues... - 30/03/2010 09:17:59 AM 483 Views
You have never provided anything even resembling evidence. - 30/03/2010 08:20:54 PM 452 Views
Dude - 30/03/2010 09:49:05 PM 440 Views
You know what's really embarrassing? - 30/03/2010 10:28:38 PM 575 Views
be nice *NM* - 31/03/2010 01:22:03 AM 230 Views
One last time... - 31/03/2010 09:18:01 AM 489 Views
Re: One last time... - 31/03/2010 06:20:24 PM 490 Views
No... - 31/03/2010 06:31:57 PM 496 Views
Re: No... - 31/03/2010 11:43:42 PM 483 Views
So... - 01/04/2010 10:22:31 AM 469 Views
Re: So... - 01/04/2010 06:41:34 PM 576 Views
Egwene did it though - 09/04/2010 02:26:10 AM 492 Views
Not before Lord of Chaos she didn't. - 09/04/2010 08:03:12 AM 473 Views
Rand does it in the end of TFoH, though, shortly before Asmo's death. *NM* - 09/04/2010 08:34:23 AM 241 Views
But we don't actually see that - 09/04/2010 12:23:37 PM 468 Views
Hmm. True, that. - 09/04/2010 07:28:15 PM 423 Views
I see what you are saying now - 09/04/2010 12:08:00 PM 421 Views
Yep - 09/04/2010 07:27:27 PM 453 Views
A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 04:31:49 PM 440 Views
Re: A question on balefire/2 servants - 24/03/2010 05:03:32 PM 461 Views
First rule of balefire: - 25/03/2010 06:44:17 AM 446 Views
Yep, that's my understanding too. - 25/03/2010 07:00:39 PM 473 Views
On the servants theory - 25/03/2010 11:33:08 AM 447 Views
Rand's odd wounds - 29/03/2010 02:48:58 AM 441 Views
Who says the Dark One couldn't bring Asmodean back? Why would he want to? - 25/03/2010 05:50:55 AM 531 Views
RJ said that. *NM* - 25/03/2010 09:31:32 AM 428 Views
Do you have that quote handy? - 28/03/2010 07:01:06 PM 463 Views
From memory, but can't find the URL - 28/03/2010 08:09:29 PM 440 Views
Here: - 29/03/2010 09:48:36 AM 451 Views
thanks! good job *NM* - 29/03/2010 10:13:12 PM 204 Views
You dont address all the criteria - 30/03/2010 11:27:58 PM 446 Views
Did you mean me? *NM* - 31/03/2010 05:54:56 AM 202 Views
@Fanatic-Templar: Proof Slayer can't travel through T'A'R... - 31/03/2010 03:54:19 AM 445 Views
Exactly my point. - 31/03/2010 05:02:41 AM 461 Views
Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 05:56:46 AM 500 Views
Lan can swordfight with his boots? *NM* - 31/03/2010 06:41:53 AM 220 Views
I don't think so... read again *NM* - 31/03/2010 10:54:03 PM 194 Views
Re: Maybe none of it matters anyway, Slayer will go down like a punk and I know how it goes - 31/03/2010 03:52:16 PM 466 Views
thanks! but as soon as I posted - 01/04/2010 03:43:59 AM 435 Views
Re: Intuitively obvious, my dear Watson - 14/05/2010 01:28:38 AM 493 Views

Reply to Message