Active Users:704 Time:08/11/2025 10:44:22 PM
Thank you! Tom Send a noteboard - 02/12/2009 01:43:05 AM
For the record, I was not trying to draw a hard and fast line between "speculative fiction" and "serious literature", but rather make the distinction that there is much speculative fiction is not serious, and variety is to be sought.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
In Support of Other Fiction - 01/12/2009 09:06:14 PM 2287 Views
- 01/12/2009 09:22:56 PM 1335 Views
Re: - 01/12/2009 09:28:04 PM 1329 Views
Wow...we were just Santified *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:16:21 PM 689 Views
Well, let me offer a diverging view on the topic of speculative fiction. - 01/12/2009 09:46:35 PM 1258 Views
I would counter that the stripping away removes a level of reality. - 01/12/2009 10:05:28 PM 1347 Views
That's a Slippery Slope Because You Could Argue On the Same Basis That All Fiction Does That. - 01/12/2009 11:34:34 PM 1384 Views
I don't see the slippery slope, but rather, a confirmation of my original point. - 02/12/2009 01:41:24 AM 1329 Views
perhaps some university will do a study - 03/12/2009 03:55:54 PM 1313 Views
I'd like to see it - 03/12/2009 09:15:12 PM 1342 Views
I'll get to it once I finish my thesis - 03/12/2009 09:56:29 PM 1283 Views
If it looks like crap and smells like crap... - 03/12/2009 10:04:15 PM 1314 Views
I Think I'll Post a Thread on This. - 03/12/2009 06:47:05 PM 1270 Views
I'd like to see it. - 03/12/2009 09:23:07 PM 1309 Views
Regarding depth in Jordan - 03/12/2009 09:31:19 PM 1292 Views
I was thinking about that too - 03/12/2009 10:05:40 PM 1297 Views
Re: I was thinking about that too - 03/12/2009 10:09:26 PM 1376 Views
Destroying the Wheel is meaningless. - 03/12/2009 10:18:08 PM 1257 Views
Re: Destroying the Wheel is meaningless. - 03/12/2009 10:30:15 PM 1310 Views
I Totally Missed That. - 04/12/2009 10:45:56 PM 1363 Views
Re: I Totally Missed That. - 04/12/2009 10:47:59 PM 1342 Views
I Don't Believe It Cursory, But Comparative. - 04/12/2009 11:29:36 PM 1454 Views
Publication bookend Y2K? - 05/12/2009 10:36:01 AM 1346 Views
They're Thick Bookends. - 05/12/2009 06:12:06 PM 1300 Views
I'll Try to Have It Up Tomorrow Early. - 04/12/2009 11:24:18 PM 1367 Views
I like it. - 01/12/2009 10:28:48 PM 1298 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 01:43:05 AM 1447 Views
I find Michel Houellebecq to be one of the most intriguing writers of our time - 01/12/2009 11:14:05 PM 1387 Views
And, in recent memory, Orwell was a first-rate writer. - 02/12/2009 01:44:29 AM 1369 Views
wait! there's somebody "dirtier" than Piers Anthony or Philip Jose Farmer??? - 03/12/2009 04:00:28 PM 1349 Views
PJF is dirty? - 04/12/2009 12:16:12 AM 1222 Views
Nice post. - 02/12/2009 12:03:09 AM 1388 Views
Perhaps you're right. - 02/12/2009 01:47:10 AM 1280 Views
In its entirety? No. - 02/12/2009 02:00:10 PM 1308 Views
I agree! - 02/12/2009 12:17:10 AM 1579 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 01:50:22 AM 1239 Views
I guess I'll break my silence after almost a month and a half... - 02/12/2009 12:23:07 AM 1407 Views
Popcorn? - 02/12/2009 12:31:44 AM 1344 Views
Yes - 02/12/2009 12:39:10 AM 1382 Views
Lovecraft? - 02/12/2009 12:51:55 AM 1364 Views
Re-read what I said - 02/12/2009 12:55:08 AM 1420 Views
aahh - 02/12/2009 09:26:40 AM 1287 Views
Larry, please tell me you weren't... - 03/12/2009 04:33:32 PM 1159 Views
I concur - 02/12/2009 12:27:13 AM 1278 Views
I like your framing of the issue (and Shannara is the Taco Bell of writing). - 02/12/2009 02:03:51 AM 1356 Views
Thank you - 02/12/2009 09:30:42 AM 1290 Views
more like the mom&pop greasy-spoon diner of writing *NM* - 03/12/2009 05:00:21 PM 612 Views
I'm going to put this in my sig, if you don't mind. - 02/12/2009 03:31:13 AM 1337 Views
hehehe - 02/12/2009 09:31:28 AM 1226 Views
Am i the only one who reads books for fun? - 02/12/2009 12:33:52 AM 1384 Views
There isn't necessarily a contradiction - 02/12/2009 12:38:43 AM 1371 Views
I certainly didn't read The Lost Symbol for ANY cultural, intellectual or edifying reason. - 02/12/2009 02:05:45 AM 1283 Views
it didn't come across that way - 03/12/2009 05:15:36 PM 1303 Views
Of course not. Personally, I don't touch anything other than mind candy when I'm in school, - 02/12/2009 03:29:23 AM 1280 Views
one of the things that is important to me in books/shows - 03/12/2009 05:20:29 PM 1212 Views
We agree! - 03/12/2009 08:03:00 PM 1284 Views
Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a science fiction/fantasy movie. - 02/12/2009 12:54:08 AM 1352 Views
i was gonna point that out. thnks. *NM* - 02/12/2009 01:13:47 AM 572 Views
Reading only speculative literature is limiting and monotonous. - 02/12/2009 02:09:42 AM 1379 Views
I was going to say exactly that about "real" literature: monotonous and limiting. - 02/12/2009 01:57:49 PM 1314 Views
I think his point was that only SF/F wasn't good food. - 02/12/2009 02:15:29 PM 1285 Views
I would not disagree with you if you said that. - 02/12/2009 02:27:08 PM 1222 Views
Most non-speculative fiction is fluff as well though. - 03/12/2009 05:38:32 PM 1199 Views
hear hear!! I agree totally wert-man - 03/12/2009 07:20:09 PM 1278 Views
Which brings us back to my point. - 03/12/2009 08:04:24 PM 1336 Views
Actually, it is a film that does not fit neatly into one category - 02/12/2009 11:16:20 AM 1338 Views
Science Fiction is the most PERTINANT form of fiction in the world today - 02/12/2009 12:57:19 AM 1317 Views
don't get me wrong - 02/12/2009 01:28:08 AM 1309 Views
SF&F and 'real literature' are not mutually exclusive - 02/12/2009 01:19:05 AM 1295 Views
No, they are not - 02/12/2009 02:18:53 AM 1287 Views
This line is a load of bull - 03/12/2009 02:39:53 PM 1408 Views
So why don't we occasionally focus on "real" books that are technically spec fiction? - 02/12/2009 01:25:04 AM 1253 Views
Why must we limit our focus in that way? - 02/12/2009 02:20:11 AM 1245 Views
I don't see it as limiting or forcing. - 02/12/2009 03:16:07 AM 1260 Views
"Elite club" or "elitist clique"? - 02/12/2009 03:52:11 AM 1249 Views
Either way, I want in. *NM* - 02/12/2009 11:33:52 AM 673 Views
Elite club is how we midwestern rednecks refer to Elitist Clique. *chews on a piece of hay* - 02/12/2009 02:52:01 PM 1416 Views
I was born in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:01:36 PM 1296 Views
I know. - 02/12/2009 03:12:05 PM 1250 Views
Green Acres in reverse, eh? - 02/12/2009 03:38:09 PM 1280 Views
lmao - 02/12/2009 06:21:17 PM 1442 Views
*piledrivers you* - 02/12/2009 06:28:02 PM 1217 Views
...! - 02/12/2009 03:17:57 PM 1240 Views
Admit it. You know what I'm talking about. - 02/12/2009 03:29:31 PM 1284 Views
Re: Admit it. You know what I'm talking about. - 02/12/2009 03:31:26 PM 1220 Views
Vermont isn't in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:39:36 PM 1226 Views
Re: Vermont isn't in the Midwest. - 02/12/2009 03:42:47 PM 1258 Views
Huh! I really didn't think of you as being a masochist. - 02/12/2009 01:51:55 AM 1249 Views
Thank you! - 02/12/2009 02:21:00 AM 1148 Views
Shitstorm! - 02/12/2009 03:06:59 AM 1206 Views
Heh heh heh. - 02/12/2009 03:45:40 AM 1263 Views
Read what you like to read. - 02/12/2009 04:18:53 AM 1351 Views
I'll super size you. Fine. *NM* - 02/12/2009 04:32:58 AM 622 Views
Oh noes! I'm getting word-fat! - 02/12/2009 04:59:05 AM 1255 Views
I seem to have struck a nerve. - 02/12/2009 05:20:27 AM 1292 Views
Apparently not the nerve you think, though. - 02/12/2009 06:42:02 AM 1363 Views
Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 02:13:10 PM 1282 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 03:26:59 PM 1291 Views
Agreed. - 02/12/2009 03:30:50 PM 1203 Views
Re: Agreed. - 02/12/2009 03:32:06 PM 1202 Views
Re: Intellectual achievement isn't a static measure. - 02/12/2009 09:40:28 PM 1354 Views
I really did get under your skin - 02/12/2009 09:58:18 PM 1199 Views
- 02/12/2009 10:06:46 PM 1198 Views
Tom as much as you raise some great points, you are being a condescending ass. - 03/12/2009 04:26:27 AM 1276 Views
You're entitled to your opinion. I don't care. - 03/12/2009 04:51:18 AM 1233 Views
I keep replying. It's like a sickness. - 03/12/2009 05:15:28 AM 1253 Views
Your subject line reinforces my opinion. - 03/12/2009 05:31:50 AM 1169 Views
Gentlemen, you can't fight in here! This is the War Room. *NM* - 03/12/2009 07:21:05 AM 617 Views
LOL! - 04/12/2009 12:21:36 AM 1226 Views
See, you just proved my point. - 04/12/2009 12:39:59 AM 1274 Views
Hm. - 02/12/2009 06:58:56 AM 1858 Views
Re-read my exact point. - 02/12/2009 02:18:20 PM 1215 Views
No. Some kind of reading is indeed essential. - 02/12/2009 02:28:22 PM 1351 Views
Somehow I get the feeling that this post hasn't caused quite as much controversy - 02/12/2009 06:53:18 AM 1371 Views
As I see it... - 02/12/2009 11:38:07 AM 1258 Views
Yep. - 02/12/2009 02:18:22 PM 1408 Views
Re: Yep. - 02/12/2009 03:35:38 PM 1273 Views
Euripides was poorly received, initially. - 02/12/2009 03:57:58 PM 1190 Views
Re: Euripides was poorly received, initially. - 02/12/2009 04:00:35 PM 1221 Views
I know. - 02/12/2009 04:18:16 PM 1273 Views
Re: I know. - 02/12/2009 04:23:14 PM 1212 Views
That is why he's so good, in my opinion. - 02/12/2009 06:15:45 PM 1379 Views
All reading of fiction is a diversion by the very nature of the activity. - 02/12/2009 03:43:05 PM 1253 Views
Diversion from direct action, yes. Diversion from reality, no. - 02/12/2009 04:15:48 PM 1219 Views
I maintain that all acts of reading fiction are a diversion from reality/ the realistic - 02/12/2009 05:43:16 PM 1238 Views
It seems a regressive argument to me. - 03/12/2009 01:18:02 AM 1192 Views
You're playing a game. - 03/12/2009 03:40:14 PM 1295 Views
I like your response. *NM* - 03/12/2009 05:37:09 PM 593 Views
I fundamentally agree with much of what you're saying, but there is a distinction. - 03/12/2009 06:44:02 PM 1291 Views
Oh I concur on that distinction. - 04/12/2009 09:06:34 PM 1314 Views
Spec fic is perhaps at it's best in autocracies? - 02/12/2009 04:10:56 PM 1184 Views
Bulgakov - 02/12/2009 04:25:17 PM 1280 Views
I've only read the first chapter of M&M. - 02/12/2009 04:36:09 PM 1250 Views
Re: I've only read the first chapter of M&M. - 02/12/2009 04:40:16 PM 1161 Views
Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me. - 02/12/2009 05:17:31 PM 1207 Views
Re: Not the greatest Tolkien scholar, me. - 02/12/2009 05:40:16 PM 1261 Views
I suppose. - 02/12/2009 06:26:30 PM 1258 Views
Re: I suppose. - 02/12/2009 07:25:26 PM 1271 Views
Well, I don't hold escapism in such low esteem *NM* - 02/12/2009 07:56:13 PM 621 Views
That is what I mean - 02/12/2009 08:36:02 PM 1202 Views
This was something I was exploring earlier. - 02/12/2009 04:34:41 PM 1312 Views
Funny thing about the hivemind antagonist. - 02/12/2009 05:13:30 PM 1255 Views
I didn't see the zombies reading speculative fiction - 02/12/2009 05:30:26 PM 1342 Views
Oh, they prefer Clive Cussler. - 02/12/2009 06:23:42 PM 1314 Views
i think it comes more down to quality than genre. - 02/12/2009 04:55:20 PM 1281 Views
I disagree with the ultimate conclusion but agree with many of your points. - 02/12/2009 05:43:04 PM 1240 Views
the illiad is a classic - 02/12/2009 06:35:24 PM 1257 Views
There's only one "L" in Iliad - 02/12/2009 08:18:38 PM 1235 Views
Is there a safe answer to that question? *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:33:21 PM 640 Views
Maybe not. *NM* - 03/12/2009 12:59:09 AM 612 Views
It took me a few minutes to agree - 02/12/2009 07:04:59 PM 1236 Views
Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post! - 02/12/2009 09:13:26 PM 1255 Views
Re: Well, I'm glad if you got something out of the post! - 02/12/2009 09:20:49 PM 1215 Views
I don't know. I've only read about 30 pages so far. *NM* - 02/12/2009 10:05:54 PM 665 Views
Many people have mentioned that there's quite a bit of good sff lit out there and you seem to agree. - 02/12/2009 07:33:42 PM 1343 Views
Hmmm - 02/12/2009 08:40:53 PM 1226 Views
Re: Hmmm - 02/12/2009 10:48:02 PM 1247 Views
The website is called "Read and Find Out". It doesn't specify what we're supposed to read. - 02/12/2009 08:42:19 PM 1321 Views
Anti the idea ? I see no evidence for this. - 02/12/2009 09:50:37 PM 1270 Views
Heh - 02/12/2009 09:56:30 PM 1265 Views
What do you mean ? Almost all the repliers agree with Tom - 03/12/2009 11:01:08 AM 1247 Views
Re: What do you mean ? Almost all the repliers agree with Tom - 03/12/2009 11:10:35 AM 1280 Views
I see. You don't read announcements. - 03/12/2009 11:12:04 AM 1220 Views
No, but it does bill itself as science fiction/fantasy. - 02/12/2009 10:51:41 PM 1366 Views
Yes. - 03/12/2009 12:01:30 AM 1340 Views
I think Rebekah and Camilla put it well. - 02/12/2009 10:05:24 PM 1351 Views
I think they make good points, as I said above. - 02/12/2009 10:56:55 PM 1222 Views
I agree with in principle - 02/12/2009 11:22:19 PM 1191 Views
Certainly. People are free to skip any discussion. - 03/12/2009 01:01:40 AM 1340 Views
I have a few objections. - 03/12/2009 12:24:43 AM 1300 Views
where else should we talk about it? - 03/12/2009 12:37:26 AM 1239 Views
random thoughts stole my subject line - 03/12/2009 01:56:07 AM 1308 Views
I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy - 03/12/2009 02:12:01 AM 1298 Views
Re: I think I could agree with a "comfort food" analogy - 03/12/2009 02:38:17 AM 1351 Views
That's it - 03/12/2009 04:02:28 AM 1378 Views
Question: is it really science fiction without one of the following: - 03/12/2009 05:13:21 AM 1270 Views
Certainly - 03/12/2009 06:13:38 AM 1338 Views
technically speaking, fantasy is classed as a sub heading under science fiction. *NM* - 03/12/2009 02:51:12 PM 535 Views
According to whom? *NM* - 03/12/2009 03:55:45 PM 666 Views
Yeah. What she asked! *NM* - 03/12/2009 09:23:55 PM 653 Views
Yes, it is but actually... - 03/12/2009 09:31:44 PM 1270 Views
Eternal Sunshine doesn't have a mad scientist. - 03/12/2009 10:09:01 PM 1200 Views
Really? - 04/12/2009 07:01:42 PM 1237 Views
But Dan Brown rocks da house!!! *NM* - 03/12/2009 02:16:47 AM 643 Views
*pumps fist* Give it up for Dan Brown! *NM* - 03/12/2009 03:58:23 AM 653 Views
That's Dan "booyah" Brown!!! Booyah!!! *NM* - 04/12/2009 02:00:56 AM 642 Views
another thing wrong with your argument - 03/12/2009 03:30:19 PM 1273 Views
Absolutely not. And, as I said before, there's only one "L" in Iliad. - 03/12/2009 06:53:35 PM 1083 Views
sorry about my atrocious spelling (including the one on pertinent) - 03/12/2009 07:14:59 PM 1376 Views
No problem. On the substantive points: - 03/12/2009 08:00:33 PM 1313 Views
more importantly, which I think it being lost in all this, - 03/12/2009 08:05:27 PM 1269 Views
I'm not reading the Iliad again, once was enough - 04/12/2009 12:19:07 PM 1229 Views
Congratulations on the replies count - 03/12/2009 09:30:41 PM 1374 Views
That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 03/12/2009 10:50:29 PM 1298 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 04/12/2009 07:44:56 PM 1335 Views
But the objective truth of a setting can be measured. - 04/12/2009 10:37:10 PM 1231 Views
But does it make any difference in the objective value of the book? - 06/12/2009 09:35:59 AM 1405 Views
YES. - 06/12/2009 03:34:17 PM 1174 Views
NO - 07/12/2009 08:40:33 PM 1288 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 04/12/2009 10:25:08 PM 1264 Views
Yes, it is worse with movies. Much worse, in fact. - 04/12/2009 10:33:18 PM 1299 Views
Re: That was a well-thought out response, but I still disagree. - 06/12/2009 09:36:11 AM 1259 Views
Maybe we're different, but I don't care for FX - 06/12/2009 01:37:53 PM 1228 Views
This is not about the personal taste - 07/12/2009 08:50:34 PM 1308 Views
I've obviously missed the show here... - 04/12/2009 12:14:30 AM 1215 Views
I'm not sure that's right. This thing just keeps growing. - 04/12/2009 12:46:24 AM 1334 Views
What, your penis? - 06/12/2009 02:40:09 AM 1243 Views
Don't you know it! - 06/12/2009 03:28:16 PM 1121 Views
You talk the talk, that's for sure. - 07/12/2009 08:14:41 PM 1277 Views
Hate to break it to you... - 07/12/2009 09:54:24 PM 1329 Views
I thought you were gonna tell me... - 08/12/2009 03:07:54 PM 1390 Views
Metaphor versus literalism - 04/12/2009 05:42:03 PM 1295 Views
aha. but. - 07/12/2009 03:56:48 PM 1436 Views
Quoting Nietzsche is really hitting below the belt. - 07/12/2009 09:12:34 PM 1361 Views
It is good I was only paraphrasing, then - 08/12/2009 10:44:14 AM 1258 Views

Reply to Message