Active Users:807 Time:14/05/2026 08:02:33 PM
It's frustrating though... LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM
because there are things to discuss in "pleasure" fantasy. No, you can't spend hours dicussing them, but there are themes, there is depth. But when you're scoffed at for even presenting it, it totally shuts you down.

For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).

But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1791 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1318 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1365 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1396 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 1242 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1507 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 1163 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 563 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1343 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 1282 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 1234 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 1217 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 1276 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1317 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1380 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 1248 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 501 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1339 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 1194 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 1202 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 1108 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1477 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1330 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 1395 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 1124 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1439 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 1313 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 1104 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1384 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1548 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1474 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1330 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1361 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 1289 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 1179 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 1064 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 1112 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 518 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 1287 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1409 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1353 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1371 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 1069 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 1123 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 1228 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 1177 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 1063 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 1107 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 1197 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 1279 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 1275 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1401 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 1210 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 1068 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1429 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 1266 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 1142 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 1306 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 1017 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1409 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1462 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 682 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 1286 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 1168 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 1285 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 508 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 1154 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 1109 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 637 Views

Reply to Message