Active Users:296 Time:27/04/2024 03:18:54 PM
Har. *NM* Raserei Send a noteboard - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM
If the troglodytes and 12-year-olds don't want to read real literature they can read the sci-fi/fantasy selection for the month in question (which is what the little cretins are likely to do anyway). Those of us who appreciate *good* literature can pick something of a higher calibre.

You know, I realised that most people here probably assume the "<pretentious>" tag in everything I write so I'll just leave it on, permanently, without a </> closing.
That's the whole trouble. You can't ever find
a place that's nice and peaceful, because there isn't any.
You may think there is, but once you get there, when you're not looking,
somebody'll sneak up and write "F*ck you" right under your nose.

~ J. D. Salinger
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1448 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 994 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1022 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1082 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 950 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1091 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 845 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 408 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1008 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 938 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 949 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 892 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 946 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 998 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1038 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 934 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 352 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1003 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 867 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 898 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 777 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1100 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 983 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 814 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1083 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 957 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 766 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1060 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1198 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1145 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1002 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1062 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 964 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 850 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 738 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 777 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 345 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 951 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1055 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1018 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1020 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 737 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 800 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 914 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 866 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 734 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 775 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 869 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 940 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 914 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1063 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 890 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 712 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1100 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 929 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 842 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 972 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 667 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1062 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1145 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 508 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 894 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 815 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 956 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 360 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 833 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 798 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 478 Views

Reply to Message