Active Users:533 Time:29/06/2026 08:19:12 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I think you misunderstand my intent Larry Send a noteboard - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM
Seriously, talking about how a book is devoid of value is not really all that fun. It can maybe generate a modicum of discussion, but that's it.

Here, I can sum up the entire discussion quickly:

Dumas was popular in France at the time and wrote fast-paced (for the time), fun stories about French history, feeding into notions of the French national psyche. He wrote in the Nineteenth Century, the era of the great novel, and so his name gets thrown in with other Nineteenth-Century authors and elevated to a level that he himself would probably not have aspired to.

The End. It was the best summer ever.


I mean the trashing of a book that several will gush over (without saying much in the way of import) has the potential for a nice "debate" that ends with "you poopyhead!", which would be as much in-depth as what I expect most of the comments to be in such threads.

Then again, I'm just jaded after a few dozen of these over the years. But if there is a Bulgakov one, I will participate. These two? Not likely, despite the coincidence of me picking up the French original.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. Tom - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1817 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) Camilla - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1343 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. Tom - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1392 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. The Shrike - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1418 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 1263 Views
Are you nuts!!?? Milla - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1535 Views
I wanted to do that too. Ghavrel - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 1189 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* Rebekah - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 573 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. Jacob - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1364 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! Tom - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 1301 Views
I agree. Rebekah - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 1257 Views
I disagree slightly Larry - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 1244 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 1299 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent Larry - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1346 Views
You poopyhead! Tom - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1409 Views
Oh, I almost forgot Larry - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 1274 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* Tom - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 511 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen Larry - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1365 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 1219 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book DomA - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 1223 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? Tom - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 1139 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? DomA - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1510 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. Tom - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1356 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen DomA - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 1421 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. Tom - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 1146 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. DomA - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1466 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. Tom - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 1336 Views
In which case... Jacob - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 1126 Views
Yes Camilla - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1410 Views
Not really. Tom - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1575 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. Rebekah - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1494 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1360 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. Rebekah - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1391 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? Tom - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 1309 Views
Heh. Rebekah - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 1203 Views
I'd laugh... LadyLorraine - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 1092 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. lord-of-shadow - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 1137 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 528 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... Raserei - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 1318 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. Ghavrel - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1439 Views
It's frustrating though... LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1378 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. Darth_Katie - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1391 Views
Perhaps. LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 1097 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. Ghavrel - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 1150 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 1251 Views
You're not. Legolas - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 1201 Views
Her next series sounds interesting LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 1088 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. Legolas - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 1128 Views
Yes, but how so? LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 1217 Views
Well... Elaine - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 1304 Views
Honestly... Legolas - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 1298 Views
Absolutely. Elaine - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1423 Views
Re: Absolutely. Legolas - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 1252 Views
In short, not a good name for a daughter. At least not one with an interest in Classics. Ghavrel - 15/01/2010 05:32:35 AM 1213 Views
I'm staying far, far away from Seneca. Legolas - 15/01/2010 02:01:49 PM 1460 Views
Ah, yes. The Apocolocyntosis. Possibly the least amusing humor ever penned. I hate Seneca. *NM* Ghavrel - 16/01/2010 02:14:32 AM 476 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out LadyLorraine - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 1089 Views
'tis. Elaine - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1453 Views
I really don't think it would. Rebekah - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 1288 Views
I have tried before. LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 1168 Views
If it is well-written and defends the value of the book, I don't see why you shouldn't post it. Tom - 12/01/2010 05:12:58 PM 1361 Views
That's bullshit Larry - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 1328 Views
True, true. Rebekah - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 1039 Views
Luckily for you... Larry - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1433 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" Raserei - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1489 Views
Har. *NM* Raserei - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 698 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. Nebhead - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 1310 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 1194 Views
I have to agree LadyLorraine - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 1305 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* Tom - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 519 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand LadyLorraine - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 1177 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... jh - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 1139 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* Raserei - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 651 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes