Active Users:300 Time:10/05/2024 08:42:41 PM
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen Larry Send a noteboard - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM
Umberto Eco a raison de le dire, Le Comte de Monte-Cristo est un grand roman mal écrit: "Monte-Cristo part en tous sens. Débordant de redondances, répétant éhontément un adjectif à une ligne d'écart, accumulant avec incontinence ces mêmes adjectifs, ouvrant de sententieuses digressions sans réussir à les fermer car la syntaxe ne suit pas, avançant ainsi en haletant par périodes de vingt lignes, le roman est mécanique et gauche dans la description des sentiments."


There's more, but I'm about to eat dinner. This should give a good sense of how he feels about the book, no?
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1455 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1000 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1027 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1090 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 958 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1100 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 852 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 412 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1016 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 946 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 956 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 900 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 955 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1006 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1045 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 943 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 356 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1013 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 874 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 906 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 788 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1111 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1001 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 994 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 823 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1095 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 965 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 774 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1067 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1205 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1152 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1010 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1071 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 972 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 859 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 748 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 786 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 350 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 959 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1063 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1026 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1028 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 746 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 807 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 922 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 876 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 744 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 783 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 876 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 949 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 924 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1070 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 899 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 717 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1108 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 938 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 850 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 979 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 675 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1069 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1153 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 511 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 903 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 823 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 962 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 364 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 842 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 806 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 482 Views

Reply to Message