Active Users:303 Time:10/05/2024 01:40:31 PM
I really don't think it would. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM
because there are things to discuss in "pleasure" fantasy. No, you can't spend hours dicussing them, but there are themes, there is depth. But when you're scoffed at for even presenting it, it totally shuts you down.

For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).

But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.


Why don't you try?
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1455 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1000 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1027 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1089 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 958 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1100 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 851 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 412 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1016 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 946 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 956 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 899 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 953 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1006 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1044 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 942 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 356 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1012 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 874 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 906 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 787 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1111 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1000 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 994 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 822 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1094 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 965 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 774 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1066 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1204 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1151 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1010 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1071 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 972 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 859 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 748 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 786 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 350 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 958 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1063 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1026 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1027 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 746 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 807 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 922 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 876 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 744 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 781 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 876 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 946 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 924 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1069 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 899 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 717 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1107 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 938 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 850 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 978 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 674 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1069 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1153 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 511 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 902 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 823 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 962 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 364 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 840 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 805 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 482 Views

Reply to Message