I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it.
Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM
because there are things to discuss in "pleasure" fantasy. No, you can't spend hours dicussing them, but there are themes, there is depth. But when you're scoffed at for even presenting it, it totally shuts you down.
For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).
But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.
For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).
But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.
I've never read any of Carey's stuff ... but those kinds of discussions (implications on history, cultural development, plot devices, narrative techniques, etc etc) are ones I like, and I'm willing to be that a lot of other people would participate too. There are very clearly a lot of people who frequent this board who are intelligent fantasy fans. And anyway, you never know until you try.
Insert theme music here.
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion.
- 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM
1680 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste)
- 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM
1230 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books.
- 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM
1286 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M.
- 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM
1318 Views
I disagree slightly
- 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM
1131 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate.
- 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM
1183 Views
- 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM
1183 Views
Oh, I almost forgot
- 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM
1166 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM*
- 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM
461 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen
- 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM
1246 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book.
- 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM
1117 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book
- 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM
1119 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness?
- 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM
1026 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen
- 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM
1260 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise.
- 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM
1035 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise.
- 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM
1329 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well.
- 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM
1222 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed.
- 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM
1382 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps.
- 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM
1243 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine.
- 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM
1276 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator?
- 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM
1189 Views
I'd laugh...
- 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM
979 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion.
- 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM
1295 Views
It's frustrating though...
- 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM
1274 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it.
- 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM
1265 Views
Perhaps.
- 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM
986 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised.
- 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM
1037 Views
You're not.
- 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM
1089 Views
Her next series sounds interesting
- 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM
964 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic.
- 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM
1023 Views
Yes, but how so?
- 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM
1103 Views
Well...
- 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM
1192 Views
Honestly...
- 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM
1186 Views
Absolutely.
- 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM
1328 Views
Re: Absolutely.
- 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM
1107 Views
In short, not a good name for a daughter. At least not one with an interest in Classics.
- 15/01/2010 05:32:35 AM
1097 Views
I'm staying far, far away from Seneca.
- 15/01/2010 02:01:49 PM
1361 Views
Ah, yes. The Apocolocyntosis. Possibly the least amusing humor ever penned. I hate Seneca. *NM*
- 16/01/2010 02:14:32 AM
429 Views
I really don't think it would.
- 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM
1170 Views
I have tried before.
- 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM
1066 Views
If it is well-written and defends the value of the book, I don't see why you shouldn't post it.
- 12/01/2010 05:12:58 PM
1239 Views
I'm quite enjoying it.
- 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM
1199 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion.
- 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM
1072 Views
I have to agree
- 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM
1197 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM*
- 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM
470 Views

True, true.