Active Users:1575 Time:14/03/2026 11:55:36 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. Darth_Katie Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM
because there are things to discuss in "pleasure" fantasy. No, you can't spend hours dicussing them, but there are themes, there is depth. But when you're scoffed at for even presenting it, it totally shuts you down.

For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).

But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.


I've never read any of Carey's stuff ... but those kinds of discussions (implications on history, cultural development, plot devices, narrative techniques, etc etc) are ones I like, and I'm willing to be that a lot of other people would participate too. There are very clearly a lot of people who frequent this board who are intelligent fantasy fans. And anyway, you never know until you try. :)
Insert theme music here.
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. Tom - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1757 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) Camilla - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1283 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. Tom - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1337 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. The Shrike - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1366 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 1207 Views
Are you nuts!!?? Milla - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1460 Views
I wanted to do that too. Ghavrel - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 1130 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* Rebekah - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 546 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. Jacob - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1306 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! Tom - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 1254 Views
I agree. Rebekah - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 1201 Views
I disagree slightly Larry - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 1188 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 1236 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent Larry - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1290 Views
You poopyhead! Tom - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1352 Views
Oh, I almost forgot Larry - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 1225 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* Tom - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 486 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen Larry - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1310 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 1170 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book DomA - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 1173 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? Tom - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 1081 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? DomA - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1443 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. Tom - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1303 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen DomA - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 1362 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. Tom - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 1091 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. DomA - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1400 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. Tom - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 1283 Views
In which case... Jacob - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 1064 Views
Yes Camilla - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1350 Views
Not really. Tom - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1521 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. Rebekah - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1439 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1295 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. Rebekah - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1331 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? Tom - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 1255 Views
Heh. Rebekah - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 1145 Views
I'd laugh... LadyLorraine - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 1031 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. lord-of-shadow - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 1078 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* Tom - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 503 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... Raserei - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 1251 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. Ghavrel - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1364 Views
It's frustrating though... LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1324 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. Darth_Katie - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1325 Views
Perhaps. LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 1041 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. Ghavrel - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 1089 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 1201 Views
You're not. Legolas - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 1151 Views
Her next series sounds interesting LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 1029 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. Legolas - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 1076 Views
Yes, but how so? LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 1163 Views
Well... Elaine - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 1243 Views
Honestly... Legolas - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 1244 Views
Absolutely. Elaine - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1377 Views
Re: Absolutely. Legolas - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 1170 Views
In short, not a good name for a daughter. At least not one with an interest in Classics. Ghavrel - 15/01/2010 05:32:35 AM 1153 Views
I'm staying far, far away from Seneca. Legolas - 15/01/2010 02:01:49 PM 1405 Views
Ah, yes. The Apocolocyntosis. Possibly the least amusing humor ever penned. I hate Seneca. *NM* Ghavrel - 16/01/2010 02:14:32 AM 453 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out LadyLorraine - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 1040 Views
'tis. Elaine - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1404 Views
I really don't think it would. Rebekah - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 1236 Views
I have tried before. LadyLorraine - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 1113 Views
If it is well-written and defends the value of the book, I don't see why you shouldn't post it. Tom - 12/01/2010 05:12:58 PM 1302 Views
That's bullshit Larry - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 1277 Views
True, true. Rebekah - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 993 Views
Luckily for you... Larry - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1381 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" Raserei - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1429 Views
Har. *NM* Raserei - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 666 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. Nebhead - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 1254 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. Tom - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 1132 Views
I have to agree LadyLorraine - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 1259 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* Tom - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 495 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand LadyLorraine - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 1123 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... jh - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 1081 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* Raserei - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 622 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes