Active Users:353 Time:17/06/2025 11:54:24 AM
I really don't think it would. Rebekah Send a noteboard - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM
because there are things to discuss in "pleasure" fantasy. No, you can't spend hours dicussing them, but there are themes, there is depth. But when you're scoffed at for even presenting it, it totally shuts you down.

For example, one of my favorite books to talk about is Kushiel's Legacy. I really like the version of our world she created. I really like discussing the implications on history, cultural development, and how different tiny plot bits she drops here and there contribute to the big picture (in all respects).

But I would never open such a thread here. Why? Because it would either be ignored or scoffed at.


Why don't you try?
*MySmiley*

Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend. Inside of a dog it's too dark to read. - Groucho Marx
Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo was a terrible choice for a book discussion. - 09/01/2010 07:41:01 PM 1590 Views
Hey, now (copy/paste) - 09/01/2010 07:48:56 PM 1141 Views
People should think about these things before recommending books. - 09/01/2010 08:13:10 PM 1154 Views
Which is why I voted for Bulgakov's M & M. - 09/01/2010 10:56:00 PM 1230 Views
Agreed. Madame Bovary is serious literature. - 10/01/2010 01:02:34 AM 1061 Views
Are you nuts!!?? - 10/01/2010 08:37:47 AM 1304 Views
I wanted to do that too. - 10/01/2010 01:24:42 AM 980 Views
It's bloody marvellous. *NM* - 10/01/2010 08:05:47 AM 464 Views
Our next discussions will have preselected options. - 10/01/2010 01:00:59 AM 1147 Views
I heartily support the move from democracy to oligarchy! - 10/01/2010 01:04:13 AM 1083 Views
I agree. - 10/01/2010 08:01:33 AM 1055 Views
I disagree slightly - 09/01/2010 09:07:12 PM 1032 Views
Well, by that standard a Jackie Collins novel is worthy of debate. - 10/01/2010 01:08:04 AM 1087 Views
I think you misunderstand my intent - 10/01/2010 01:10:57 AM 1136 Views
You poopyhead! - 10/01/2010 01:19:11 AM 1175 Views
Oh, I almost forgot - 10/01/2010 01:11:50 AM 1084 Views
Ooh...I'd love to hear them!!! What did Eco say to trash Dumas? *NM* - 10/01/2010 01:19:43 AM 409 Views
Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 10/01/2010 01:39:28 AM 1152 Views
I love it. Strangely enough, though, he wrote an introduction to the book. - 10/01/2010 01:54:24 AM 1014 Views
Not really strange as Eco has long been fascinated by this book - 11/01/2010 05:01:56 PM 1035 Views
Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:12:55 PM 926 Views
Re: Did he mention it in his book on ugliness? - 11/01/2010 05:52:29 PM 1253 Views
I like Eco's distinction between light fiction and literature. - 12/01/2010 04:16:38 PM 1136 Views
Re: Here's the French translation from Eco's work on supermen - 11/01/2010 03:49:15 PM 1145 Views
That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 05:12:25 PM 945 Views
Re: That's fascinating. Of course, I disagree with Eco's praise. - 11/01/2010 06:22:24 PM 1223 Views
I agree that abridging it would not work well. - 12/01/2010 04:06:26 PM 1110 Views
In which case... - 12/01/2010 05:22:34 PM 916 Views
Yes - 13/01/2010 07:56:08 PM 1200 Views
Not really. - 15/01/2010 01:18:10 PM 1346 Views
I think there are plenty of things that can be discussed. - 09/01/2010 10:00:06 PM 1288 Views
Discussed and put to rest in 5 minutes or less, perhaps. - 10/01/2010 01:17:02 AM 1144 Views
Depends on who you are, one would imagine. - 10/01/2010 08:16:11 AM 1205 Views
<pretentious>Well, why should we cater to the lowest common denominator? - 11/01/2010 02:17:03 AM 1094 Views
Heh. - 11/01/2010 07:49:47 AM 1000 Views
I'd laugh... - 11/01/2010 07:21:38 PM 882 Views
Tom is the primary reason I want an ignore feature again. - 12/01/2010 02:17:29 AM 929 Views
I'm glad to hear that. *NM* - 12/01/2010 04:17:30 PM 405 Views
And so you've reached this decision about Tom... - 18/01/2010 10:10:44 PM 1110 Views
I don't get that. Well, of course I do from Tom, but let's put him aside for this discussion. - 12/01/2010 03:35:21 AM 1195 Views
It's frustrating though... - 12/01/2010 04:18:37 AM 1158 Views
I think if you posted that (or something like it) people would reply to it. - 12/01/2010 05:08:53 AM 1167 Views
Perhaps. - 12/01/2010 05:26:38 AM 885 Views
Given the people who have read the Kushiel books, I think you'd be pleasantly surprised. - 12/01/2010 05:58:33 AM 944 Views
I was mostly just giving an example. - 12/01/2010 06:14:04 AM 1052 Views
You're not. - 12/01/2010 02:16:09 PM 1004 Views
Her next series sounds interesting - 12/01/2010 02:20:17 PM 873 Views
It does, but the reviews I've seen aren't too enthusiastic. - 12/01/2010 02:29:26 PM 925 Views
Yes, but how so? - 12/01/2010 02:39:59 PM 1018 Views
Well... - 13/01/2010 07:03:08 PM 1082 Views
Honestly... - 13/01/2010 07:51:14 PM 1066 Views
Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 12:55:00 PM 1214 Views
Re: Absolutely. - 14/01/2010 01:57:47 PM 1025 Views
ah i didn't realize it was already out - 13/01/2010 11:44:53 PM 845 Views
'tis. - 14/01/2010 12:56:11 PM 1244 Views
I really don't think it would. - 12/01/2010 07:49:32 AM 1078 Views
I have tried before. - 12/01/2010 01:59:24 PM 977 Views
That's bullshit - 12/01/2010 11:12:55 PM 1121 Views
True, true. - 16/01/2010 08:54:16 AM 829 Views
Luckily for you... - 16/01/2010 08:59:23 AM 1211 Views
Re: "Omigod you read light fantasy?" - 18/01/2010 10:04:41 PM 1277 Views
Har. *NM* - 18/01/2010 10:03:31 PM 588 Views
I'm quite enjoying it. - 09/01/2010 10:40:30 PM 1110 Views
A kid's book of adventure doesn't translate into a good book club discussion. - 10/01/2010 01:21:11 AM 955 Views
I have to agree - 11/01/2010 12:36:55 AM 1106 Views
How did you find deeper meaning (pun intended) in 20,000 Leagues Under the Sea? *NM* - 11/01/2010 02:17:55 AM 413 Views
It was half bullshit, you must understand - 11/01/2010 03:59:42 PM 977 Views
Come on, there is lovely tragedy there... - 13/01/2010 07:32:49 PM 941 Views
I am pleased to be referenced in a cross-board discussion. *NM* - 18/01/2010 09:29:45 PM 555 Views

Reply to Message