Active Users:416 Time:17/06/2025 01:56:20 AM
Well, I haven't finished it yet. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 30/01/2010 02:21:08 AM
But so far it hasn't been entirely dark, no. I don't fully understand the hero's motivation, but I've only read one chapter with him in it.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexandre Dumas - Book Club now open! - 25/01/2010 10:54:37 PM 2593 Views
Le plot. - 25/01/2010 10:55:26 PM 1372 Views
Plot: demarcation, plan, complot... - 26/01/2010 11:48:19 PM 1521 Views
Les characters. - 25/01/2010 10:56:23 PM 1461 Views
The good, the bad and the ugly. - 26/01/2010 10:54:38 AM 1481 Views
Hmm. - 27/01/2010 03:58:31 PM 1406 Views
Re: Hmm. - 27/01/2010 04:59:12 PM 1466 Views
Re: Hmm. - 28/01/2010 01:40:34 PM 1419 Views
Re: Hmm. - 01/02/2010 12:49:06 PM 1612 Views
Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 25/01/2010 10:57:37 PM 1449 Views
Or rather, does this book share any traits in common with pornography? - 25/01/2010 11:14:01 PM 1551 Views
I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak. - 26/01/2010 03:43:04 AM 1486 Views
Re: I think the revenge plot is actually fairly weak. - 26/01/2010 11:12:19 AM 1529 Views
In that case, the "release" is quite unsatisfying. - 27/01/2010 01:42:28 PM 1634 Views
Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 02:06:58 PM 1521 Views
Oh, and your point on revenge - that's just reading too much into the text. - 27/01/2010 02:16:05 PM 1355 Views
There is no such thing - 27/01/2010 02:18:46 PM 1403 Views
I fundamentally disagree with your post-modern take on the novel. - 27/01/2010 02:25:25 PM 1456 Views
It isn't a postmodern take on it - 27/01/2010 02:41:32 PM 1428 Views
Re: Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 03:40:36 PM 1410 Views
Maybe it's of the same importance as the Lost Symbol. - 27/01/2010 03:44:55 PM 1472 Views
If I ddin't know better, I might think you a trifle petulant - 27/01/2010 04:19:57 PM 1536 Views
I'm never petulant - 27/01/2010 04:55:56 PM 1397 Views
Re: Which is precisely part of what makes the book interesting - 27/01/2010 04:47:37 PM 1526 Views
I think one important question to ask is... - 26/01/2010 12:00:17 AM 1507 Views
I have read the abridged version a couple of times. I am reading the unabridged version this time. - 26/01/2010 03:25:50 AM 1450 Views
the potentially removable part... - 26/01/2010 11:24:16 AM 1514 Views
I have read both - 27/01/2010 01:37:00 AM 1537 Views
The abridged versus the unabridged - 28/01/2010 06:32:22 AM 1446 Views
Re: Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 27/01/2010 01:16:47 AM 1579 Views
Re: Why does the book have enduring appeal? - 30/01/2010 09:12:22 AM 1455 Views
Re: I got here too late, so I offer Umberto Eco's thoughts on the matter: - 22/02/2010 06:59:13 PM 1645 Views
I'm watching right back, Big Brother. *NM* - 25/01/2010 11:44:30 PM 760 Views
*NM* - 25/01/2010 11:45:27 PM 752 Views
The book was very childish. - 26/01/2010 03:05:01 AM 1563 Views
Granted, The Master and Margarita is also very much a fantasy book. *NM* - 26/01/2010 03:07:45 AM 781 Views
No, it really isn't. - 26/01/2010 03:10:08 AM 1525 Views
You know, this is a problem. - 26/01/2010 03:43:14 AM 1501 Views
There's really nothing I can say to this that Greg didn't just say above. - 26/01/2010 06:32:02 AM 1561 Views
People tend to forget one thing about Tolkien - 26/01/2010 01:36:06 PM 1483 Views
Re: No, it really isn't. - 26/01/2010 10:57:19 AM 1430 Views
I'll admit the only Lem I've read is Solaris... - 26/01/2010 01:52:02 PM 1515 Views
Read His Master's Voice - 26/01/2010 04:52:31 PM 1423 Views
You make some rather odd claims here, Tom - 27/01/2010 12:43:41 AM 1531 Views
You place undue importance on academic degrees. - 27/01/2010 01:19:40 AM 1505 Views
You misread totally what I said, I see... - 27/01/2010 01:52:59 AM 1402 Views
My claims are far from odd. In fact, they're quite common. - 27/01/2010 01:57:41 AM 1474 Views
In some circles; in others, they're rather antiquated nowadays - 27/01/2010 02:21:03 AM 1422 Views
If you were trying to write literature, wouldn't the label sting for you? - 27/01/2010 01:25:14 PM 1477 Views
I think it's easier to think of stories fitting into genre(s) than to think the same of authors - 27/01/2010 02:40:29 PM 1532 Views
Allow me to clarify: I'm talking about authors' reactions to their books being so labelled. - 27/01/2010 03:08:47 PM 1577 Views
But yet their reactions vary widely - 27/01/2010 11:33:25 PM 1459 Views
My fundamental premise is that genre has the most utility when applied to derivative fiction. - 28/01/2010 09:39:17 PM 1425 Views
And yet that term is mostly used as a non-loaded term that doesn't attempt to ascribe quality levels - 29/01/2010 02:49:20 AM 1362 Views
I like my definition of science fiction better than the one you quoted. - 29/01/2010 05:16:36 AM 1420 Views
I think estrangement is a key element, though - 30/01/2010 11:00:19 PM 1395 Views
I don't think estrangement is a necessary element. - 30/01/2010 11:47:07 PM 1592 Views
I mean it as a literary effect, that of creating a distance between text and reader - 31/01/2010 12:03:34 AM 1412 Views
Even if that's the meaning, I still disagree. - 03/02/2010 12:49:58 AM 1398 Views
Depends on how you view SF, I suppose - 03/02/2010 04:20:56 AM 1266 Views
I thought that was what we were mulling over - 03/02/2010 04:38:35 AM 1397 Views
True - 03/02/2010 05:11:19 AM 1333 Views
Nice tie-in! - 03/02/2010 01:55:33 PM 1370 Views
- 05/02/2010 06:06:23 AM 1454 Views
The approve of this message. - 26/01/2010 03:34:49 AM 1485 Views
I'm not through it quite yet, but I do have a question - 26/01/2010 12:24:14 PM 1413 Views
Wait...you VOTED for this book? - 26/01/2010 01:41:00 PM 1462 Views
I honestly can't remember. - 26/01/2010 01:55:39 PM 1428 Views
Doctor Zhivago is one of the best novels ever written. - 26/01/2010 02:12:35 PM 1441 Views
Right, so now we all know that if we'd just listen to me more often, the world would be better. - 26/01/2010 02:20:56 PM 1436 Views
The problem was that the suggestions were generally not that good. - 26/01/2010 02:32:50 PM 1486 Views
Possession is not "purely a romance novel". - 26/01/2010 02:57:17 PM 1611 Views
Which basically proves my entire point. - 26/01/2010 03:00:20 PM 1469 Views
Which is purely a romance novel? - 26/01/2010 02:59:38 PM 1486 Views
Fair enough, it might be a bit tricky to discuss. *NM* - 26/01/2010 03:04:58 PM 765 Views
In your opinion - 26/01/2010 03:07:12 PM 1490 Views
Exactly why I avoid suggesting modern books - 26/01/2010 03:10:09 PM 1479 Views
You really are ignornant of what A.S. Byatt writes, aren't you? - 27/01/2010 12:51:00 AM 1460 Views
Oh, I fucking hate epistolary novels. Thank you for warning me. - 27/01/2010 02:00:34 AM 1365 Views
Ha! - 27/01/2010 02:22:00 AM 1430 Views
Perhaps I would like it. I still hate epistolary novels. - 27/01/2010 01:26:43 PM 1453 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 26/01/2010 02:01:22 PM 701 Views
It's funny because I think it's a question of taste level. - 26/01/2010 02:32:08 PM 1514 Views
Curious George is a tale of many layers, as told by Werner Herzog - 26/01/2010 02:34:27 PM 1567 Views
I don't care if this validates your opinion of me. - 29/01/2010 11:06:18 PM 1367 Views
On what basis? - 26/01/2010 02:51:40 PM 1519 Views
It's a children's book. Get over it. Democracy failed. - 26/01/2010 02:55:03 PM 1514 Views
Usually does, when those who know better keep silent. - 26/01/2010 02:57:54 PM 1405 Views
I didn't keep silent, though. - 26/01/2010 04:46:48 PM 1507 Views
You're ignoring what we've been discussing. - 27/01/2010 11:11:44 AM 1456 Views
Regarding comfort zones - 26/01/2010 05:08:50 PM 1525 Views
Camilla, let's be honest here... - 26/01/2010 05:40:08 PM 1556 Views
Re: Camilla, let's be honest here... - 26/01/2010 09:10:47 PM 1506 Views
If that's your goal, Camilla, you failed. - 27/01/2010 01:35:52 PM 1579 Views
Possibly - 27/01/2010 01:38:39 PM 1432 Views
I have not been ranting and raving. I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification. - 27/01/2010 01:45:05 PM 1452 Views
Re: I've been highly critical of the book, with much justification. - 27/01/2010 01:53:28 PM 1434 Views
I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg. - 27/01/2010 02:26:12 PM 1566 Views
Don't you get it? We bring this place down. - 27/01/2010 02:42:32 PM 1404 Views
Re: I was wondering how long it would take for you to blame me and Greg. - 27/01/2010 02:43:11 PM 1429 Views
While that was not the intent, that is an added bonus. - 27/01/2010 02:48:47 PM 1425 Views
why is it a bonus? - 27/01/2010 02:52:58 PM 1387 Views
I said see above. You should have before the thought police, Rebekah, started to delete. - 27/01/2010 02:59:07 PM 1672 Views
I did - 27/01/2010 04:40:25 PM 1464 Views
Re: Regarding comfort zones - 27/01/2010 11:57:03 AM 1489 Views
Re: Regarding comfort zones - 27/01/2010 11:59:31 AM 1444 Views
Halfway - 27/01/2010 12:07:14 PM 1426 Views
Re: Halfway - 27/01/2010 12:09:02 PM 1461 Views
Re: The book was very childish. - 30/01/2010 09:56:29 PM 1461 Views
I read it in French - 30/01/2010 10:54:34 PM 1341 Views
So. I really liked it. - 26/01/2010 08:57:02 AM 1580 Views
Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand. - 26/01/2010 11:04:23 PM 1433 Views
Re: Yes, fearless leader, this is where I stand. - 26/01/2010 11:49:03 PM 1484 Views
We were talking about this last night. - 27/01/2010 11:14:21 AM 1558 Views
Re: We were talking about this last night. - 27/01/2010 11:37:04 AM 1560 Views
If you do that, I'm posting on the deeper meaning of Dan Brown. - 27/01/2010 01:46:35 PM 1530 Views
Feel free to. - 27/01/2010 01:51:23 PM 1501 Views
Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit. - 27/01/2010 02:28:56 PM 1459 Views
Re: Your post-modern take on the novel is shit, shit, shit. - 27/01/2010 02:45:41 PM 1499 Views
I'm not setting up a straw man. I'm challenging your touchy-feely approach. - 27/01/2010 03:15:00 PM 1377 Views
My touchy-feely approach? - 27/01/2010 05:09:04 PM 1409 Views
Yes...using passing references in the text to justify a deeper analysis. - 27/01/2010 05:16:10 PM 1440 Views
Doesn't touchy-feely mean that it is steeped in or based on emotion? - 27/01/2010 06:40:31 PM 1413 Views
I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here. - 27/01/2010 07:01:08 PM 1390 Views
You summed up my reasons for using "touchy-feely" quite well. - 27/01/2010 07:27:45 PM 1416 Views
Glad to hear it. - 27/01/2010 07:39:20 PM 1303 Views
Re: I think between the two of you I agree more with Tom here. - 27/01/2010 08:29:32 PM 1475 Views
See my reply to Tom for clarification, then. - 27/01/2010 08:57:18 PM 1520 Views
Re: See my reply to Tom for clarification, then. - 27/01/2010 09:09:47 PM 1432 Views
Well, so what will it be? - 27/01/2010 09:14:53 PM 1384 Views
Er. Whose position are you arguing - mine or yours? - 27/01/2010 10:33:01 PM 1319 Views
Do it. I'd read that. - 27/01/2010 01:55:23 PM 1556 Views
Re: Do it. I'd read that. - 27/01/2010 02:10:04 PM 1458 Views
Right then. - 27/01/2010 02:15:04 PM 1423 Views
All righty, that's enough of that. For Tom, Greg, and... no, pretty much just you two. - 27/01/2010 04:33:00 PM 1482 Views
And ANOTHER THING - 27/01/2010 05:05:17 PM 1347 Views
Not everyone has finished reading it yet *NM* - 27/01/2010 05:12:10 PM 813 Views
Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing. - 27/01/2010 05:17:51 PM 1513 Views
Re: Okay, so you'll get one or two stragglers in a week to a month. It changes nothing. - 27/01/2010 06:41:11 PM 1461 Views
We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults. - 27/01/2010 07:30:49 PM 1392 Views
In the interest of discussing Dumas' intentions... - 27/01/2010 08:03:24 PM 1563 Views
It was mildly interesting. - 27/01/2010 09:04:03 PM 1519 Views
I think you're misreading that... - 27/01/2010 10:18:11 PM 1535 Views
Re: We are discussing this book. We're discussing its faults. - 27/01/2010 08:30:19 PM 1517 Views
The text doesn't warrant "close attention" any more than Dan Brown's works do. - 27/01/2010 09:10:45 PM 1396 Views
fine. *NM* - 27/01/2010 09:12:44 PM 747 Views
Also, do you think a good book would have generated this level of discussion? Of course not. - 27/01/2010 05:21:45 PM 1429 Views
What discussion? - 27/01/2010 06:42:32 PM 1453 Views
I said that we couldn't discuss the book on its own terms. - 27/01/2010 07:35:32 PM 1538 Views
Which I still think we can. - 27/01/2010 08:35:35 PM 1420 Views
Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all. - 27/01/2010 09:06:59 PM 1518 Views
Re: Perhaps you shouldn't be breaking things down at all. - 27/01/2010 09:12:22 PM 1474 Views
You have yet to show any utility for breaking things down. - 27/01/2010 09:19:29 PM 1545 Views
I haven't tried to show any "utility" for it. - 01/02/2010 01:06:35 PM 1388 Views
I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on. - 27/01/2010 10:40:36 PM 1446 Views
Re: I apologize if I'm part of the reason you feel ganged up on. - 01/02/2010 12:56:03 PM 1363 Views
Deary me. - 27/01/2010 05:19:58 PM 1644 Views
By "respect" do you mean that you want me to drop my debates? - 27/01/2010 05:24:03 PM 1396 Views
Not at all. - 27/01/2010 05:35:34 PM 1559 Views
Okay, I'm cool with that. - 27/01/2010 05:44:54 PM 1544 Views
Thank you. - 27/01/2010 05:48:05 PM 2092 Views
Please ban me, then. - 27/01/2010 06:44:55 PM 1389 Views
Nods - 18/02/2010 05:06:44 PM 1879 Views
Oh man, I love this thread. *NM* - 28/01/2010 01:17:58 AM 732 Views
On the nature of the "Book Club" - 28/01/2010 09:23:23 PM 1314 Views
Any chance of seeing some shorter suggestions? - 28/01/2010 10:20:59 PM 1529 Views
Yes, shorter would be good. - 28/01/2010 10:23:28 PM 1377 Views
Oh i'm not complaining - 28/01/2010 10:33:48 PM 1394 Views
Sure sounded like it. - 28/01/2010 10:38:27 PM 1444 Views
No for reals, shorter is good. - 29/01/2010 01:08:26 AM 1421 Views
Absolutely. - 29/01/2010 03:33:15 AM 1364 Views
Agreed - 29/01/2010 11:26:34 AM 1437 Views
Well, you should have known better! - 29/01/2010 01:29:40 AM 1424 Views
I do. - 29/01/2010 08:31:30 PM 1401 Views
Thought you did - 29/01/2010 08:38:39 PM 1395 Views
- 29/01/2010 08:51:42 PM 1413 Views
All I can say is The Master and Margarita better be one by March. WE WAS ROBBED. *NM* - 29/01/2010 02:31:48 AM 711 Views
That is the other one that I am considering. *NM* - 29/01/2010 03:32:02 AM 733 Views
I'll re-read Zhivago or Master if either is chosen - 29/01/2010 05:26:02 AM 1370 Views
Talk to me Ghavrel. - 30/01/2010 12:09:24 AM 1326 Views
Well, I haven't finished it yet. - 30/01/2010 02:21:08 AM 1389 Views
Re: On the nature of the "Book Club" - 29/01/2010 12:33:03 PM 1351 Views
I didn't read it for the Book Club - 29/01/2010 12:40:22 AM 1387 Views
Well I'm late to the party - 29/01/2010 06:21:18 AM 1358 Views
No, you're early - 01/02/2010 01:26:10 PM 1271 Views
I still have yet to see that discussion, Camilla. *NM* - 03/02/2010 12:46:24 AM 771 Views
A few comments - 04/02/2010 06:39:18 AM 1701 Views
If I kept you from participating, that's your fault. - 04/02/2010 01:01:46 PM 1349 Views
An interesting quote from the book - does it jibe with your experience? - 29/01/2010 11:23:54 PM 1436 Views
Sure. - 01/02/2010 03:23:59 PM 1395 Views

Reply to Message