Some crackpot on the Telegraph is claiming that there is no evidence for evolution.
I didn't see anywhere in that article that the author claims that. I did see, however, a presentation by the author of "the top five arguments, on either side of this monumental disagreement."
..the author wasn't using wikipedia as his source of knowledge.
But then what would anyone expect from a film reviewer writing a piece about creationism v evolution?
I imagine he was having a right laugh to himself about it all.
I can't even believe this.
- 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM
1189 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM
718 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM
805 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article...
- 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM
752 Views
Re: I can't even believe this.
- 13/09/2009 09:05:45 PM
734 Views
I'd agree with you, if...
- 13/09/2009 10:36:07 PM
737 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM
393 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory
- 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM
712 Views
Re: definition of "theory"
- 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM
794 Views
I can't really tell
- 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM
759 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing
- 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM
912 Views
That's... not exactly it.
- 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM
669 Views
not that is exactly it
- 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM
923 Views
No, Craig is quite right.
- 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM
717 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him
- 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM
728 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
915 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
915 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
881 Views
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
881 Views
'Fraid not.
- 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM
730 Views
It's not, it's supposed to be relatively decent - mainstream conservative newspaper. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 11:28:44 PM
340 Views
Re: 'Fraid not.
- 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
714 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
810 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
810 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here...
- 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM
776 Views
Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM
704 Views
Re: Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM
810 Views
One brain C4, coming up...
- 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM
782 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument
- 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM
786 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column.
- 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM
745 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
- 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
804 Views
Um.
- 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM
855 Views
LOL
- 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM
793 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly.
- 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM
715 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1254 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1254 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting
- 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM
731 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas
- 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM
876 Views

*NM*