Active Users:470 Time:15/09/2026 01:26:21 AM
Ithat was meant to be an eidt. oh well random thoughts Send a noteboard - 15/09/2009 01:23:36 AM
It's a shittily written article.


The only thing I see shitty is the shallowness of the criticism.

* Space

Objects in space, which are more than 8,000 light years away, can be seen from earth.

This is under the category "Arguments to support evolution." What the bloody blue blazes does that have to do with anything?


See this is people who laugh at the other side but don't understand the issues themselves come in.

This is an important point against the argument that the universe is only 6,000 years old. How can that be when some of the light reaching the earth took more then 8,000 years to get here?

I wouldn't put it at the top of my list but it does have something to with the issue and it is easier for the layperson to understand then most dating methods.

Maybe this is a joke newspaper in the UK - I'm not familiar with it, I just recognize the name. But this is shoddy "journalism," about something that's already a hot-button topic.


Did you believe it was meant to settle the issue instead of just give some highlights?

Now if you really want me to "refute any of the claims made by creationist outside of [my] semantics issue," I could go to town. But really I thought the whole article was stupid, but didn't feel like spending too much time on it, so I made one pithy comment and moved on. ~shrug~


yet you are still in the discussion haven't shown any knowledge of the issue as of yet.

I can do a fine job refuting creationism myself and I can do it without simply pointing and laughing at people.
Reply to message
I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM 1274 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place. - 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM 796 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place. - 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM 899 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article... - 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM 854 Views
ditto *NM* - 13/09/2009 08:11:45 PM 405 Views
Re: ditto - 13/09/2009 10:01:54 PM 933 Views
wow why a witty and well thought out rebuttal. - 14/09/2009 10:02:14 PM 808 Views
Ugh. Interesting subject, awful article. - 13/09/2009 08:27:15 PM 864 Views
Re: I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 09:05:45 PM 813 Views
Re: I can't even believe this. - 13/09/2009 10:33:47 PM 737 Views
I'd agree with you, if... - 13/09/2009 10:36:07 PM 822 Views
*sigh* People bashing other people. - 13/09/2009 10:02:54 PM 875 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM* - 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM 445 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory - 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM 793 Views
Re: definition of "theory" - 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM 932 Views
Re: definition of "theory" - 14/09/2009 08:56:48 AM 961 Views
I can't really tell - 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM 854 Views
Re: I think I was agreeing with you, yes *NM* - 15/09/2009 12:37:00 AM 398 Views
Oh, good. I'll let you live. *NM* - 15/09/2009 01:55:49 AM 450 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing - 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM 1004 Views
That's... not exactly it. - 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM 753 Views
not that is exactly it - 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM 1008 Views
No, Craig is quite right. - 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM 812 Views
Heh. You were much more diplomatic about it than I was. *NM* - 14/09/2009 11:24:41 PM 448 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him - 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM 815 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press... - 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM 1003 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press... - 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM 972 Views
To butt in for a second... - 15/09/2009 07:38:05 PM 822 Views
'Fraid not. - 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM 819 Views
Re: 'Fraid not. - 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM 793 Views
Re: 'Fraid not. - 15/09/2009 01:22:59 AM 981 Views
Ithat was meant to be an eidt. oh well - 15/09/2009 01:23:36 AM 870 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM 893 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here... - 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM 868 Views
Interrupter! - 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM 790 Views
Re: Interrupter! - 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM 894 Views
One brain C4, coming up... - 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM 861 Views
Nicely put - 15/09/2009 03:48:42 PM 780 Views
Yes, I know. - 15/09/2009 04:55:22 PM 900 Views
PFt - 15/09/2009 04:56:19 PM 801 Views
Are you telling me I am getting predictable? - 15/09/2009 04:58:59 PM 873 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument - 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM 868 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column. - 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM 845 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie - 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM 879 Views
That, I can agree with. *NM* - 15/09/2009 08:22:44 PM 414 Views
Um. - 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM 939 Views
LOL - 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM 896 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly. - 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM 800 Views
Heh. - 15/09/2009 09:54:00 PM 879 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to - 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM 1344 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting - 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM 811 Views
Re: I happen to find it all extremely interesting - 15/09/2009 10:36:14 PM 888 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas - 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM 963 Views
Having just been to the Creationist Museum last Monday - 16/09/2009 12:00:12 AM 1108 Views
All hail the Flying Spaghetti Monster! - 16/09/2009 06:03:20 AM 789 Views

Reply to Message