Active Users:176 Time:19/05/2024 01:15:11 PM
When you give me an example of Jefferson murdering women and children that analogy will work. Joel Send a noteboard - 15/11/2010 01:49:04 PM
Traitors to their king, the lot of them. I can't stand rebels, hanging it too good for them:|

I love that Jefferson quote on more levels than I can list. :)

Though INDIVIDUALS on the Revolutionary side are known to have committed what I can only call terrorism against Colonial Tories. I don't excuse, condone or deny that, but if comparing the Founding Fathers to bin Laden (whether it's you or St. Reagan making the comparison) worked, John Adams wouldn't have won an acquittal for the British soldiers involved in the Boston Massacre, he'd have been part of the lynchmob howling for their blood.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Subversive Websites - 13/11/2010 10:49:15 PM 1199 Views
"Intended or serving to subvert, especially intended to overthrow or undermine an established govt". - 14/11/2010 01:44:14 AM 595 Views
Re: Gee, thanks dad! *NM* - 14/11/2010 01:32:32 PM 447 Views
Well, I'm hoping I simply disagree with your diction rather than your motives. - 14/11/2010 03:36:57 PM 658 Views
Re: No, you disagree with my motives. - 15/11/2010 01:06:54 AM 666 Views
The Founding Fathers of the US? - 15/11/2010 10:18:32 AM 671 Views
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God". - 15/11/2010 01:15:33 PM 710 Views
I'm sure bin Laden completely agrees - 15/11/2010 01:32:53 PM 693 Views
When you give me an example of Jefferson murdering women and children that analogy will work. - 15/11/2010 01:49:04 PM 612 Views
yes because Jefferson was a PARAGON of virtue himself - 15/11/2010 02:17:58 PM 701 Views
I wasn't aware I'd made that statement. - 15/11/2010 02:25:27 PM 551 Views
nvm, I was going to argue but I have decided not to *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:46:42 PM 411 Views
So you are being completely subjective here? It is wrong, unless it is for a cause you support? *NM* - 15/11/2010 02:30:37 PM 338 Views
No, it's a question of precedence. - 15/11/2010 04:13:04 PM 579 Views
His analogy works very well, and you are still being subjective. - 15/11/2010 08:23:25 PM 809 Views
The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 09:17:01 PM 759 Views
Re: The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 10:52:40 PM 581 Views
I don't believe that at all. - 16/11/2010 12:08:26 AM 489 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 16/11/2010 11:52:36 PM 668 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 17/11/2010 01:34:29 AM 656 Views
No, its relevancy is difficult to grasp. - 16/11/2010 07:19:11 AM 756 Views
Maybe I just have an unusual perspective. - 16/11/2010 04:15:39 PM 725 Views
I didn't know they bombed a SCHOOL!!! - 16/11/2010 04:31:24 PM 596 Views
Please. If there were any soldiers in the WTC on 911 it was coincidental. - 16/11/2010 04:40:51 PM 637 Views
perhaps, but not all important targets are military targets. - 16/11/2010 04:57:20 PM 774 Views
Not all important targets are LEGITIMATE targets either. - 16/11/2010 05:06:11 PM 598 Views
I don't wish one, but I hate sidebars - 16/11/2010 05:09:33 PM 644 Views
All about priorities; your call. - 16/11/2010 10:33:53 PM 561 Views
That's so many hours of my life I'll never get back. - 16/11/2010 10:41:55 PM 662 Views
This your first time on the CMB? - 16/11/2010 11:18:03 PM 606 Views
No, NOW I know what's going on! - 16/11/2010 04:36:04 PM 741 Views
Still doesn't work. - 16/11/2010 04:50:58 PM 734 Views
Those last sentences are going way overboard. - 16/11/2010 05:08:40 PM 599 Views
Terrorism is inexcusable and indefensible, but at least there's a LOGIC to it. - 16/11/2010 05:21:15 PM 698 Views
First of all, your generalizations were misguided. - 16/11/2010 05:40:55 PM 709 Views
Of course I disagree, but that's a different and older debate. - 16/11/2010 11:10:23 PM 855 Views
I will try to be brief. Try. - 16/11/2010 11:28:28 PM 656 Views
Heh. - 16/11/2010 11:55:40 PM 613 Views
mostly agree - 16/11/2010 11:18:14 PM 567 Views
. . . and now I'm thinking you're the one willfully misunderstanding. - 16/11/2010 05:36:15 PM 635 Views
Not willful, at least. - 17/11/2010 12:29:42 AM 611 Views
sorry - 16/11/2010 11:24:44 PM 655 Views
Well, you know what I was going on about, if that helps? *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:25:18 PM 396 Views
"Subversion" has the connotation of treason, however wrongly. - 15/11/2010 01:32:06 PM 681 Views
Re: Non-sequitur, non-sequitur, CAPS LOCK, opinion, CAPS LOCK. - 15/11/2010 10:45:41 PM 518 Views
Either my mind moves much faster than ya'lls, or ya'll are deliberately missing the point. - 16/11/2010 12:05:28 AM 679 Views
I am curious. - 16/11/2010 01:10:52 AM 538 Views
Argggh, ya got me! - 16/11/2010 05:11:41 PM 535 Views
the dictionary has -nia and -iums. - 16/11/2010 05:16:32 PM 638 Views
I prefer "millennia" but recall someone telling me that's not technically right. - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 566 Views
well, in American English, they're apparantly both "correct" *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:13:40 PM 433 Views
In American English, almost anything is. - 17/11/2010 01:02:15 AM 691 Views
It is right. It's the one thing that's easy in Latin and Greek declensions. - 16/11/2010 06:33:12 PM 613 Views
You call then "neutral" over there? Interesting. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:42:00 PM 427 Views
Neutral, neutrum, neuter, whatever. Details. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:45:29 PM 379 Views
Do only neuter words end in -um? - 16/11/2010 06:57:39 PM 664 Views
Yes. I think so, anyway - been a good while since I had Latin. - 16/11/2010 07:12:09 PM 651 Views
Thanks. Maybe that's what I'm remembering. - 16/11/2010 07:17:05 PM 630 Views
IIRC, the number of "n"s was the issue. - 17/11/2010 01:06:24 AM 661 Views
Should definitely be two. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:48:51 AM 349 Views
Ah, thanks. - 17/11/2010 02:08:08 AM 647 Views
Silly laptops.... - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 733 Views
- 16/11/2010 05:35:22 PM 569 Views
I'm horrible about using "conjugate" as a blanket term. - 17/11/2010 01:09:34 AM 693 Views
I'm definitely missing the point. - 16/11/2010 06:58:17 AM 655 Views
Well, hopefully we've cleared things up now. *MN* - 16/11/2010 05:30:46 PM 681 Views
I don't know if it qualifies as subversive... - 14/11/2010 02:47:34 AM 764 Views
Re: That's not bad. - 14/11/2010 01:38:02 PM 639 Views
The Chap - 14/11/2010 01:58:27 PM 548 Views
Thanks. - 14/11/2010 03:04:49 PM 638 Views
All my subversive websites are religious. - 15/11/2010 02:26:42 AM 594 Views
Re: I'm certainly interested. - 15/11/2010 03:37:11 AM 623 Views
Well, okay then. - 15/11/2010 04:23:35 AM 690 Views
Some stuff I think is pretty neat: - 15/11/2010 07:24:41 PM 711 Views
Re: Noice, noice. - 15/11/2010 11:01:31 PM 642 Views
That first link is really good. - 15/11/2010 11:18:25 PM 737 Views
Re: Ha! - 16/11/2010 11:55:42 PM 542 Views
Re: Also, I like your poems. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:02:27 AM 375 Views
Re: Dude. - 20/11/2010 02:14:38 AM 689 Views
you mean besides this one? *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:55:03 PM 281 Views
Re: I AM NOT SUBVERTING NEBHEAD!! - 15/11/2010 11:02:10 PM 636 Views
Re: William Faulkner would be unhappy with my thread. - 16/11/2010 08:29:42 PM 604 Views
My work here is done. - 16/11/2010 08:34:22 PM 561 Views
Re: Yes, it's fairly obvious that you need to respond. *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:40:10 PM 411 Views
I often wish I didn't. - 17/11/2010 01:49:33 AM 529 Views
I'm calling you out on this one. - 18/11/2010 12:06:17 AM 586 Views
It's not perfect, but it's the lesser of many evils, IMHO. - 18/11/2010 01:12:43 AM 630 Views
You people with your words. - 16/11/2010 08:34:17 PM 723 Views
. - 16/11/2010 08:54:22 PM 518 Views
Re: I still say we should start a band. - 20/11/2010 02:42:48 AM 652 Views
Re: Man, that attack on Cameron is brutal. *NM* - 20/11/2010 02:47:12 AM 359 Views
Re: Awesome. - 16/11/2010 11:38:29 PM 653 Views

Reply to Message