Active Users:607 Time:01/06/2026 06:29:03 PM
I prefer "millennia" but recall someone telling me that's not technically right. Joel Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM
if you're looking for the "proper latin" whatever, or which is MORE proper, I don't have that for you. But that's what the dictionary says :P

What I can't recall is what he said WAS right; I'll NB later, thanks though. :)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Subversive Websites - 13/11/2010 10:49:15 PM 1430 Views
"Intended or serving to subvert, especially intended to overthrow or undermine an established govt". - 14/11/2010 01:44:14 AM 811 Views
Re: Gee, thanks dad! *NM* - 14/11/2010 01:32:32 PM 525 Views
Well, I'm hoping I simply disagree with your diction rather than your motives. - 14/11/2010 03:36:57 PM 870 Views
Re: No, you disagree with my motives. - 15/11/2010 01:06:54 AM 842 Views
The Founding Fathers of the US? - 15/11/2010 10:18:32 AM 883 Views
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God". - 15/11/2010 01:15:33 PM 918 Views
I'm sure bin Laden completely agrees - 15/11/2010 01:32:53 PM 890 Views
When you give me an example of Jefferson murdering women and children that analogy will work. - 15/11/2010 01:49:04 PM 850 Views
yes because Jefferson was a PARAGON of virtue himself - 15/11/2010 02:17:58 PM 940 Views
I wasn't aware I'd made that statement. - 15/11/2010 02:25:27 PM 762 Views
nvm, I was going to argue but I have decided not to *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:46:42 PM 477 Views
So you are being completely subjective here? It is wrong, unless it is for a cause you support? *NM* - 15/11/2010 02:30:37 PM 403 Views
No, it's a question of precedence. - 15/11/2010 04:13:04 PM 778 Views
His analogy works very well, and you are still being subjective. - 15/11/2010 08:23:25 PM 1016 Views
The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 09:17:01 PM 997 Views
Re: The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 10:52:40 PM 805 Views
I don't believe that at all. - 16/11/2010 12:08:26 AM 663 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 16/11/2010 11:52:36 PM 912 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 17/11/2010 01:34:29 AM 894 Views
No, its relevancy is difficult to grasp. - 16/11/2010 07:19:11 AM 1118 Views
Maybe I just have an unusual perspective. - 16/11/2010 04:15:39 PM 934 Views
I didn't know they bombed a SCHOOL!!! - 16/11/2010 04:31:24 PM 815 Views
Please. If there were any soldiers in the WTC on 911 it was coincidental. - 16/11/2010 04:40:51 PM 813 Views
perhaps, but not all important targets are military targets. - 16/11/2010 04:57:20 PM 993 Views
Not all important targets are LEGITIMATE targets either. - 16/11/2010 05:06:11 PM 817 Views
I don't wish one, but I hate sidebars - 16/11/2010 05:09:33 PM 870 Views
All about priorities; your call. - 16/11/2010 10:33:53 PM 787 Views
That's so many hours of my life I'll never get back. - 16/11/2010 10:41:55 PM 819 Views
This your first time on the CMB? - 16/11/2010 11:18:03 PM 838 Views
No, NOW I know what's going on! - 16/11/2010 04:36:04 PM 961 Views
Still doesn't work. - 16/11/2010 04:50:58 PM 990 Views
Those last sentences are going way overboard. - 16/11/2010 05:08:40 PM 824 Views
Terrorism is inexcusable and indefensible, but at least there's a LOGIC to it. - 16/11/2010 05:21:15 PM 910 Views
First of all, your generalizations were misguided. - 16/11/2010 05:40:55 PM 931 Views
Of course I disagree, but that's a different and older debate. - 16/11/2010 11:10:23 PM 1102 Views
I will try to be brief. Try. - 16/11/2010 11:28:28 PM 904 Views
Heh. - 16/11/2010 11:55:40 PM 795 Views
mostly agree - 16/11/2010 11:18:14 PM 769 Views
. . . and now I'm thinking you're the one willfully misunderstanding. - 16/11/2010 05:36:15 PM 832 Views
Not willful, at least. - 17/11/2010 12:29:42 AM 791 Views
sorry - 16/11/2010 11:24:44 PM 881 Views
Well, you know what I was going on about, if that helps? *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:25:18 PM 473 Views
"Subversion" has the connotation of treason, however wrongly. - 15/11/2010 01:32:06 PM 892 Views
Re: Non-sequitur, non-sequitur, CAPS LOCK, opinion, CAPS LOCK. - 15/11/2010 10:45:41 PM 707 Views
Either my mind moves much faster than ya'lls, or ya'll are deliberately missing the point. - 16/11/2010 12:05:28 AM 917 Views
I am curious. - 16/11/2010 01:10:52 AM 756 Views
Argggh, ya got me! - 16/11/2010 05:11:41 PM 762 Views
the dictionary has -nia and -iums. - 16/11/2010 05:16:32 PM 859 Views
I prefer "millennia" but recall someone telling me that's not technically right. - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 809 Views
well, in American English, they're apparantly both "correct" *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:13:40 PM 515 Views
In American English, almost anything is. - 17/11/2010 01:02:15 AM 879 Views
It is right. It's the one thing that's easy in Latin and Greek declensions. - 16/11/2010 06:33:12 PM 808 Views
You call then "neutral" over there? Interesting. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:42:00 PM 506 Views
Neutral, neutrum, neuter, whatever. Details. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:45:29 PM 455 Views
Do only neuter words end in -um? - 16/11/2010 06:57:39 PM 877 Views
Yes. I think so, anyway - been a good while since I had Latin. - 16/11/2010 07:12:09 PM 864 Views
Thanks. Maybe that's what I'm remembering. - 16/11/2010 07:17:05 PM 848 Views
IIRC, the number of "n"s was the issue. - 17/11/2010 01:06:24 AM 839 Views
Should definitely be two. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:48:51 AM 419 Views
Ah, thanks. - 17/11/2010 02:08:08 AM 846 Views
Silly laptops.... - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 940 Views
- 16/11/2010 05:35:22 PM 767 Views
I'm horrible about using "conjugate" as a blanket term. - 17/11/2010 01:09:34 AM 903 Views
I'm definitely missing the point. - 16/11/2010 06:58:17 AM 855 Views
Well, hopefully we've cleared things up now. *MN* - 16/11/2010 05:30:46 PM 864 Views
I don't know if it qualifies as subversive... - 14/11/2010 02:47:34 AM 970 Views
Re: That's not bad. - 14/11/2010 01:38:02 PM 870 Views
The Chap - 14/11/2010 01:58:27 PM 763 Views
Thanks. - 14/11/2010 03:04:49 PM 837 Views
All my subversive websites are religious. - 15/11/2010 02:26:42 AM 834 Views
Re: I'm certainly interested. - 15/11/2010 03:37:11 AM 847 Views
Well, okay then. - 15/11/2010 04:23:35 AM 911 Views
Some stuff I think is pretty neat: - 15/11/2010 07:24:41 PM 913 Views
Re: Noice, noice. - 15/11/2010 11:01:31 PM 853 Views
That first link is really good. - 15/11/2010 11:18:25 PM 954 Views
Re: Ha! - 16/11/2010 11:55:42 PM 719 Views
Re: Also, I like your poems. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:02:27 AM 449 Views
Re: Dude. - 20/11/2010 02:14:38 AM 920 Views
you mean besides this one? *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:55:03 PM 355 Views
Re: I AM NOT SUBVERTING NEBHEAD!! - 15/11/2010 11:02:10 PM 838 Views
Re: William Faulkner would be unhappy with my thread. - 16/11/2010 08:29:42 PM 826 Views
My work here is done. - 16/11/2010 08:34:22 PM 784 Views
Re: Yes, it's fairly obvious that you need to respond. *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:40:10 PM 476 Views
I often wish I didn't. - 17/11/2010 01:49:33 AM 737 Views
I'm calling you out on this one. - 18/11/2010 12:06:17 AM 798 Views
It's not perfect, but it's the lesser of many evils, IMHO. - 18/11/2010 01:12:43 AM 860 Views
You people with your words. - 16/11/2010 08:34:17 PM 930 Views
. - 16/11/2010 08:54:22 PM 715 Views
Re: I still say we should start a band. - 20/11/2010 02:42:48 AM 884 Views
Re: Man, that attack on Cameron is brutal. *NM* - 20/11/2010 02:47:12 AM 435 Views
Re: Awesome. - 16/11/2010 11:38:29 PM 841 Views

Reply to Message