Active Users:194 Time:19/05/2024 11:30:56 AM
Argggh, ya got me! Joel Send a noteboard - 16/11/2010 05:11:41 PM
Why do you insist on typing out et alia? If you're going to be a wanker* about it, why do I never see you using et alii or et aliae?

*If you've never read Carpe Diem: Put A Little Latin in Your Life, you should ;)

I guess that's why everyone else uses the abbreviation; I'm certainly not going to try to conjugate Latin. Just moments ago I was wishing Vodalus were around to tell me the proper plural of "millenium". So the answer to your question is "because a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, and I don't know any better". :<img class=' /> I'll add the book to my reading list though, thanks; sounds interesting (but then, I consider Fowlers interesting. :P ).
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Subversive Websites - 13/11/2010 10:49:15 PM 1198 Views
"Intended or serving to subvert, especially intended to overthrow or undermine an established govt". - 14/11/2010 01:44:14 AM 595 Views
Re: Gee, thanks dad! *NM* - 14/11/2010 01:32:32 PM 447 Views
Well, I'm hoping I simply disagree with your diction rather than your motives. - 14/11/2010 03:36:57 PM 658 Views
Re: No, you disagree with my motives. - 15/11/2010 01:06:54 AM 665 Views
The Founding Fathers of the US? - 15/11/2010 10:18:32 AM 670 Views
"Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God". - 15/11/2010 01:15:33 PM 709 Views
I'm sure bin Laden completely agrees - 15/11/2010 01:32:53 PM 693 Views
When you give me an example of Jefferson murdering women and children that analogy will work. - 15/11/2010 01:49:04 PM 611 Views
yes because Jefferson was a PARAGON of virtue himself - 15/11/2010 02:17:58 PM 701 Views
I wasn't aware I'd made that statement. - 15/11/2010 02:25:27 PM 550 Views
nvm, I was going to argue but I have decided not to *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:46:42 PM 410 Views
So you are being completely subjective here? It is wrong, unless it is for a cause you support? *NM* - 15/11/2010 02:30:37 PM 338 Views
No, it's a question of precedence. - 15/11/2010 04:13:04 PM 578 Views
His analogy works very well, and you are still being subjective. - 15/11/2010 08:23:25 PM 809 Views
The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 09:17:01 PM 758 Views
Re: The precedence is inherent in the statement; that was Jeffersons point. - 15/11/2010 10:52:40 PM 580 Views
I don't believe that at all. - 16/11/2010 12:08:26 AM 489 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 16/11/2010 11:52:36 PM 667 Views
Re: As I mentioned numerous times. - 17/11/2010 01:34:29 AM 655 Views
No, its relevancy is difficult to grasp. - 16/11/2010 07:19:11 AM 756 Views
Maybe I just have an unusual perspective. - 16/11/2010 04:15:39 PM 724 Views
I didn't know they bombed a SCHOOL!!! - 16/11/2010 04:31:24 PM 596 Views
Please. If there were any soldiers in the WTC on 911 it was coincidental. - 16/11/2010 04:40:51 PM 637 Views
perhaps, but not all important targets are military targets. - 16/11/2010 04:57:20 PM 774 Views
Not all important targets are LEGITIMATE targets either. - 16/11/2010 05:06:11 PM 598 Views
I don't wish one, but I hate sidebars - 16/11/2010 05:09:33 PM 644 Views
All about priorities; your call. - 16/11/2010 10:33:53 PM 560 Views
That's so many hours of my life I'll never get back. - 16/11/2010 10:41:55 PM 662 Views
This your first time on the CMB? - 16/11/2010 11:18:03 PM 606 Views
No, NOW I know what's going on! - 16/11/2010 04:36:04 PM 741 Views
Still doesn't work. - 16/11/2010 04:50:58 PM 734 Views
Those last sentences are going way overboard. - 16/11/2010 05:08:40 PM 598 Views
Terrorism is inexcusable and indefensible, but at least there's a LOGIC to it. - 16/11/2010 05:21:15 PM 698 Views
First of all, your generalizations were misguided. - 16/11/2010 05:40:55 PM 709 Views
Of course I disagree, but that's a different and older debate. - 16/11/2010 11:10:23 PM 855 Views
I will try to be brief. Try. - 16/11/2010 11:28:28 PM 656 Views
Heh. - 16/11/2010 11:55:40 PM 613 Views
mostly agree - 16/11/2010 11:18:14 PM 566 Views
. . . and now I'm thinking you're the one willfully misunderstanding. - 16/11/2010 05:36:15 PM 635 Views
Not willful, at least. - 17/11/2010 12:29:42 AM 610 Views
sorry - 16/11/2010 11:24:44 PM 654 Views
Well, you know what I was going on about, if that helps? *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:25:18 PM 395 Views
"Subversion" has the connotation of treason, however wrongly. - 15/11/2010 01:32:06 PM 681 Views
Re: Non-sequitur, non-sequitur, CAPS LOCK, opinion, CAPS LOCK. - 15/11/2010 10:45:41 PM 518 Views
Either my mind moves much faster than ya'lls, or ya'll are deliberately missing the point. - 16/11/2010 12:05:28 AM 679 Views
I am curious. - 16/11/2010 01:10:52 AM 538 Views
Argggh, ya got me! - 16/11/2010 05:11:41 PM 535 Views
the dictionary has -nia and -iums. - 16/11/2010 05:16:32 PM 638 Views
I prefer "millennia" but recall someone telling me that's not technically right. - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 565 Views
well, in American English, they're apparantly both "correct" *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:13:40 PM 432 Views
In American English, almost anything is. - 17/11/2010 01:02:15 AM 690 Views
It is right. It's the one thing that's easy in Latin and Greek declensions. - 16/11/2010 06:33:12 PM 612 Views
You call then "neutral" over there? Interesting. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:42:00 PM 427 Views
Neutral, neutrum, neuter, whatever. Details. *NM* - 16/11/2010 06:45:29 PM 378 Views
Do only neuter words end in -um? - 16/11/2010 06:57:39 PM 664 Views
Yes. I think so, anyway - been a good while since I had Latin. - 16/11/2010 07:12:09 PM 651 Views
Thanks. Maybe that's what I'm remembering. - 16/11/2010 07:17:05 PM 630 Views
IIRC, the number of "n"s was the issue. - 17/11/2010 01:06:24 AM 661 Views
Should definitely be two. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:48:51 AM 349 Views
Ah, thanks. - 17/11/2010 02:08:08 AM 647 Views
Silly laptops.... - 16/11/2010 05:32:34 PM 733 Views
- 16/11/2010 05:35:22 PM 568 Views
I'm horrible about using "conjugate" as a blanket term. - 17/11/2010 01:09:34 AM 693 Views
I'm definitely missing the point. - 16/11/2010 06:58:17 AM 654 Views
Well, hopefully we've cleared things up now. *MN* - 16/11/2010 05:30:46 PM 681 Views
I don't know if it qualifies as subversive... - 14/11/2010 02:47:34 AM 764 Views
Re: That's not bad. - 14/11/2010 01:38:02 PM 638 Views
The Chap - 14/11/2010 01:58:27 PM 548 Views
Thanks. - 14/11/2010 03:04:49 PM 637 Views
All my subversive websites are religious. - 15/11/2010 02:26:42 AM 593 Views
Re: I'm certainly interested. - 15/11/2010 03:37:11 AM 622 Views
Well, okay then. - 15/11/2010 04:23:35 AM 690 Views
Some stuff I think is pretty neat: - 15/11/2010 07:24:41 PM 711 Views
Re: Noice, noice. - 15/11/2010 11:01:31 PM 642 Views
That first link is really good. - 15/11/2010 11:18:25 PM 736 Views
Re: Ha! - 16/11/2010 11:55:42 PM 542 Views
Re: Also, I like your poems. *NM* - 17/11/2010 01:02:27 AM 375 Views
Re: Dude. - 20/11/2010 02:14:38 AM 689 Views
you mean besides this one? *NM* - 15/11/2010 07:55:03 PM 281 Views
Re: I AM NOT SUBVERTING NEBHEAD!! - 15/11/2010 11:02:10 PM 635 Views
Re: William Faulkner would be unhappy with my thread. - 16/11/2010 08:29:42 PM 604 Views
My work here is done. - 16/11/2010 08:34:22 PM 561 Views
Re: Yes, it's fairly obvious that you need to respond. *NM* - 16/11/2010 11:40:10 PM 411 Views
I often wish I didn't. - 17/11/2010 01:49:33 AM 529 Views
I'm calling you out on this one. - 18/11/2010 12:06:17 AM 586 Views
It's not perfect, but it's the lesser of many evils, IMHO. - 18/11/2010 01:12:43 AM 629 Views
You people with your words. - 16/11/2010 08:34:17 PM 723 Views
. - 16/11/2010 08:54:22 PM 517 Views
Re: I still say we should start a band. - 20/11/2010 02:42:48 AM 652 Views
Re: Man, that attack on Cameron is brutal. *NM* - 20/11/2010 02:47:12 AM 359 Views
Re: Awesome. - 16/11/2010 11:38:29 PM 653 Views

Reply to Message