It was an f*ing filme review and the first post claimed it was an article supporting creationism. Instead of calling that idea silly we got a bunch of people apearing to agre. From what I can see the majority of those people know very little about the creationist thinking or the debate between creation an evolution. I find all of that highly ironic.
See, there's the problem. It wasn't a film review - it's an article about an upcoming movie, and the debate it has sparked. In fact, the title of the article is "Creation film sparks evolution arguments." And the author decides to take it upon his/herself to finish up with a terrible list of the "top 5 arguments for each side."
Maybe it's just me (though judging from this thread, I doubt it), but it also looked like the author spend a modicum more time on the "arguments for creation" column, which led me to believe that was his/her personal stance. Regardless, the general shoddiness of the article stands, no matter the author's personal feelings on the matter.
I am made of poison.
I can't even believe this.
- 13/09/2009 07:40:02 PM
1274 Views
Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 07:43:15 PM
796 Views
Re: Take a deep breath, close your eyes and go to your happy place.
- 13/09/2009 10:28:42 PM
897 Views
That is one amazingly stupid article...
- 13/09/2009 08:04:47 PM
854 Views
The author used the phrase "proven theories." Ergo, their argument is invalid. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 01:11:51 AM
445 Views
seriously. there's no such thing as a truly proven theory
- 14/09/2009 01:52:30 AM
793 Views
Re: definition of "theory"
- 14/09/2009 04:49:13 AM
932 Views
I can't really tell
- 14/09/2009 08:14:14 PM
854 Views
I think you are getting workedup over nothing
- 14/09/2009 09:57:22 PM
1004 Views
That's... not exactly it.
- 14/09/2009 10:33:02 PM
752 Views
not that is exactly it
- 14/09/2009 11:10:52 PM
1007 Views
No, Craig is quite right.
- 14/09/2009 11:21:11 PM
811 Views
No you just happen to wrong with him
- 15/09/2009 01:14:16 AM
814 Views
Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
1003 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:51:46 AM
1003 Views
Re: Well, maybe this has to do with your low opinion of the British press...
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
970 Views
- 15/09/2009 05:32:51 PM
970 Views
'Fraid not.
- 14/09/2009 11:24:00 PM
817 Views
It's not, it's supposed to be relatively decent - mainstream conservative newspaper. *NM*
- 14/09/2009 11:28:44 PM
432 Views
Re: 'Fraid not.
- 15/09/2009 01:21:14 AM
793 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
891 Views
- 15/09/2009 02:14:37 AM
891 Views
completely aside from this argument you guys have here...
- 15/09/2009 05:02:21 AM
868 Views
Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:11:40 AM
790 Views
Re: Interrupter!
- 15/09/2009 06:54:56 AM
894 Views
One brain C4, coming up...
- 15/09/2009 12:00:26 PM
861 Views
The age of the universe is an important point in the creationist argument
- 15/09/2009 05:53:41 PM
866 Views
Exactly. So it was in the wrong column.
- 15/09/2009 07:58:15 PM
845 Views
what I think has been lost in the debate is it looks like it will be a good movie
- 15/09/2009 08:14:04 PM
878 Views
Um.
- 14/09/2009 11:28:28 PM
939 Views
LOL
- 15/09/2009 09:29:16 PM
895 Views
Really? Because this was a rather atypical debate, honestly.
- 15/09/2009 09:43:13 PM
799 Views
Well, I can pretend if you want me to
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1344 Views
- 15/09/2009 10:07:59 PM
1344 Views
I happen to find it all extremely interesting
- 15/09/2009 10:23:19 PM
811 Views
There are some places you can go that discuss the creationist ideas
- 15/09/2009 10:58:25 PM
963 Views

*NM*