IS it that you think the mass estimates are actually off or that they are right and we just can't see the otherwise normal matter? Because they're kinda separate for the purpose of producing supporting evidence.
What bothers me is that there seem to be several possible but largely unexplored alternatives to "well, that's dark matter irrefutably proven then". I'm reminded of that Laplace line paraphrased as extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary evidence; positing not just neutrinos but an entire new class of matter strikes me as something requiring a bit more evidence than one anomaly can provide. Particularly given many members of the group pressing that claim reject far older and less controversial claims possessing far more evidence....
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Exciting video about the universe
- 28/04/2011 10:14:55 AM
1352 Views
I still think dark matter's just non-luminous matter without a convenient light source to reflect.
- 28/04/2011 10:34:21 PM
1071 Views
We've just about ruled out the idea that dark matter is just non-luminous "ordinary" matter.
- 28/04/2011 11:44:34 PM
1007 Views
I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 29/04/2011 01:52:49 AM
921 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 29/04/2011 02:56:32 AM
1036 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 30/04/2011 05:02:49 PM
969 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 30/04/2011 08:56:35 PM
925 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 02/05/2011 01:28:30 AM
899 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 04/05/2011 04:18:18 AM
980 Views
There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 07/05/2011 02:04:53 AM
1075 Views
- 07/05/2011 02:04:53 AM
1075 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 09/05/2011 11:28:48 PM
905 Views
- 09/05/2011 11:28:48 PM
905 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 14/05/2011 05:36:45 AM
874 Views
- 14/05/2011 05:36:45 AM
874 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 17/05/2011 02:09:40 AM
945 Views
- 17/05/2011 02:09:40 AM
945 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 19/05/2011 04:55:21 AM
876 Views
- 19/05/2011 04:55:21 AM
876 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 24/05/2011 09:32:27 PM
952 Views
- 24/05/2011 09:32:27 PM
952 Views
The Pati-Salam model was the one I had in mind.
- 24/05/2011 10:34:04 PM
901 Views
Re: The Pati-Salam model was the one I had in mind.
- 24/05/2011 11:08:01 PM
1120 Views
Re: The Pati-Salam model was the one I had in mind.
- 25/05/2011 01:27:10 AM
920 Views
Re: The Pati-Salam model was the one I had in mind.
- 31/05/2011 09:16:18 AM
987 Views
Apologies for the delay; internet's been spotty and I've been busy lately.
- 10/06/2011 12:09:04 AM
1246 Views
Re: Apologies for the delay; internet's been spotty and I've been busy lately.
- 14/06/2011 03:38:18 AM
1240 Views
Also, re: lensing from ordinary matter:
- 29/04/2011 05:18:47 AM
926 Views
This seems like another example of what confuses the issue.
- 30/04/2011 05:25:04 PM
1055 Views
Re: This seems like another example of what confuses the issue.
- 30/04/2011 08:56:40 PM
1021 Views
That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 02/05/2011 01:29:03 AM
1008 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 04/05/2011 04:18:24 AM
964 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 07/05/2011 02:05:02 AM
1156 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 09/05/2011 11:29:36 PM
928 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 14/05/2011 05:35:56 AM
1219 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 17/05/2011 02:09:55 AM
813 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 19/05/2011 02:47:25 AM
1170 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 24/05/2011 09:46:30 PM
939 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 25/05/2011 12:20:10 AM
1254 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 31/05/2011 09:16:22 AM
1090 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 10/06/2011 12:04:06 AM
1310 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 14/06/2011 03:38:12 AM
1050 Views
Re: I still think... (apparently, there is a 100 character limit on subjects, and yours was 99)
- 28/04/2011 11:57:15 PM
1378 Views
Seems to happen to me a lot; sorry.
- 29/04/2011 12:56:14 AM
916 Views
None of this reflects on the actual facts of dark matter.
- 29/04/2011 01:32:52 AM
935 Views
I concede my grasp (or grope) is a somewhat superficial laymans, yes.
- 30/04/2011 04:30:28 PM
1069 Views
Re: I concede my grasp (or grope) is a somewhat superficial laymans, yes.
- 30/04/2011 08:56:44 PM
880 Views
Re: I concede my grasp (or grope) is a somewhat superficial laymans, yes.
- 02/05/2011 01:28:58 AM
1405 Views
Re: I concede my grasp (or grope) is a somewhat superficial laymans, yes.
- 04/05/2011 04:18:27 AM
892 Views
I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 07/05/2011 02:05:09 AM
1137 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 09/05/2011 11:32:17 PM
1017 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 14/05/2011 05:36:24 AM
1233 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 17/05/2011 02:10:03 AM
942 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 19/05/2011 04:33:06 AM
1218 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 24/05/2011 09:59:38 PM
939 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 24/05/2011 11:19:43 PM
897 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 24/05/2011 11:33:58 PM
858 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 25/05/2011 12:55:36 AM
957 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 31/05/2011 09:16:24 AM
904 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 10/06/2011 12:09:13 AM
1089 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 14/06/2011 03:38:05 AM
1063 Views
Might help if you clarified where your skepticism is at
- 29/04/2011 02:32:07 AM
880 Views
Potentially either, or a combination of the two.
- 30/04/2011 02:36:50 PM
952 Views
It's hard to discuss without knowing your objections a bit more clearly
- 30/04/2011 04:58:03 PM
869 Views
My primary objection is that alternatives to dark matter seem to have been ruled out prematurely.
- 02/05/2011 01:29:14 AM
1057 Views
