IS it that you think the mass estimates are actually off or that they are right and we just can't see the otherwise normal matter? Because they're kinda separate for the purpose of producing supporting evidence.
What bothers me is that there seem to be several possible but largely unexplored alternatives to "well, that's dark matter irrefutably proven then". I'm reminded of that Laplace line paraphrased as extraordinary claims requiring extraordinary evidence; positing not just neutrinos but an entire new class of matter strikes me as something requiring a bit more evidence than one anomaly can provide. Particularly given many members of the group pressing that claim reject far older and less controversial claims possessing far more evidence....
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Exciting video about the universe
- 28/04/2011 10:14:55 AM
1503 Views
I still think dark matter's just non-luminous matter without a convenient light source to reflect.
- 28/04/2011 10:34:21 PM
1201 Views
We've just about ruled out the idea that dark matter is just non-luminous "ordinary" matter.
- 28/04/2011 11:44:34 PM
1145 Views
I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 29/04/2011 01:52:49 AM
1070 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 29/04/2011 02:56:32 AM
1184 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 30/04/2011 05:02:49 PM
1131 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 30/04/2011 08:56:35 PM
1050 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 02/05/2011 01:28:30 AM
1036 Views
Re: I'm aware of the Bullet Cluster, though admittedly not much more than that.
- 04/05/2011 04:18:18 AM
1130 Views
There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 07/05/2011 02:04:53 AM
1217 Views
- 07/05/2011 02:04:53 AM
1217 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 09/05/2011 11:28:48 PM
1051 Views
- 09/05/2011 11:28:48 PM
1051 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 14/05/2011 05:36:45 AM
1017 Views
- 14/05/2011 05:36:45 AM
1017 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 17/05/2011 02:09:40 AM
1074 Views
- 17/05/2011 02:09:40 AM
1074 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 19/05/2011 04:55:21 AM
1016 Views
- 19/05/2011 04:55:21 AM
1016 Views
Re: There's such a thing as knowing when you're licked, and I believe I am.
- 24/05/2011 09:32:27 PM
1080 Views
- 24/05/2011 09:32:27 PM
1080 Views
The Pati-Salam model was the one I had in mind.
- 24/05/2011 10:34:04 PM
1019 Views
Re: The Pati-Salam model was the one I had in mind.
- 24/05/2011 11:08:01 PM
1278 Views
Re: The Pati-Salam model was the one I had in mind.
- 25/05/2011 01:27:10 AM
1052 Views
Re: The Pati-Salam model was the one I had in mind.
- 31/05/2011 09:16:18 AM
1135 Views
Apologies for the delay; internet's been spotty and I've been busy lately.
- 10/06/2011 12:09:04 AM
1393 Views
Re: Apologies for the delay; internet's been spotty and I've been busy lately.
- 14/06/2011 03:38:18 AM
1390 Views
Also, re: lensing from ordinary matter:
- 29/04/2011 05:18:47 AM
1100 Views
This seems like another example of what confuses the issue.
- 30/04/2011 05:25:04 PM
1193 Views
Re: This seems like another example of what confuses the issue.
- 30/04/2011 08:56:40 PM
1146 Views
That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 02/05/2011 01:29:03 AM
1159 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 04/05/2011 04:18:24 AM
1100 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 07/05/2011 02:05:02 AM
1301 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 09/05/2011 11:29:36 PM
1059 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 14/05/2011 05:35:56 AM
1366 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 17/05/2011 02:09:55 AM
946 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 19/05/2011 02:47:25 AM
1301 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 24/05/2011 09:46:30 PM
1082 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 25/05/2011 12:20:10 AM
1382 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 31/05/2011 09:16:22 AM
1319 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 10/06/2011 12:04:06 AM
1448 Views
Re: That discussion seems to reduce to "as little new and exotic physics as possible".
- 14/06/2011 03:38:12 AM
1195 Views
Re: I still think... (apparently, there is a 100 character limit on subjects, and yours was 99)
- 28/04/2011 11:57:15 PM
1538 Views
Seems to happen to me a lot; sorry.
- 29/04/2011 12:56:14 AM
1063 Views
None of this reflects on the actual facts of dark matter.
- 29/04/2011 01:32:52 AM
1076 Views
I concede my grasp (or grope) is a somewhat superficial laymans, yes.
- 30/04/2011 04:30:28 PM
1204 Views
Re: I concede my grasp (or grope) is a somewhat superficial laymans, yes.
- 30/04/2011 08:56:44 PM
1098 Views
Re: I concede my grasp (or grope) is a somewhat superficial laymans, yes.
- 02/05/2011 01:28:58 AM
1558 Views
Re: I concede my grasp (or grope) is a somewhat superficial laymans, yes.
- 04/05/2011 04:18:27 AM
1036 Views
I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 07/05/2011 02:05:09 AM
1337 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 09/05/2011 11:32:17 PM
1155 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 14/05/2011 05:36:24 AM
1390 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 17/05/2011 02:10:03 AM
1070 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 19/05/2011 04:33:06 AM
1355 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 24/05/2011 09:59:38 PM
1071 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 24/05/2011 11:19:43 PM
1029 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 24/05/2011 11:33:58 PM
991 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 25/05/2011 12:55:36 AM
1081 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 31/05/2011 09:16:24 AM
1048 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 10/06/2011 12:09:13 AM
1215 Views
Re: I don't object to changing my mind, but can take more convincing than I really should.
- 14/06/2011 03:38:05 AM
1209 Views
Might help if you clarified where your skepticism is at
- 29/04/2011 02:32:07 AM
1009 Views
Potentially either, or a combination of the two.
- 30/04/2011 02:36:50 PM
1070 Views
It's hard to discuss without knowing your objections a bit more clearly
- 30/04/2011 04:58:03 PM
990 Views
My primary objection is that alternatives to dark matter seem to have been ruled out prematurely.
- 02/05/2011 01:29:14 AM
1242 Views
