No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
Joel Send a noteboard - 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
So maybe it wasn't perfect, but it got the job done. In the end, this may just be another great illustration of a fact well known and loathed by lawyers, scientists and other metaphysicians (a word I incidentally still dislike, if you're reading this, Dan 
): Things we can PROVE are only a subset of the much larger group of things we KNOW. God's not dead, but the Great Watchmaker died a long time ago with Schrödingers Cat.
): Things we can PROVE are only a subset of the much larger group of things we KNOW. God's not dead, but the Great Watchmaker died a long time ago with Schrödingers Cat.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1086 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
731 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
848 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
848 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
793 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
776 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
655 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
849 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
872 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
773 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
794 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
802 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
906 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
759 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
839 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
899 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
724 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
706 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
830 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
333 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
775 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
806 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
827 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
821 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
808 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
831 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
342 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
342 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
366 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
366 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
805 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
949 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
711 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
928 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
742 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
779 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
717 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
876 Views