No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
Joel Send a noteboard - 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
So maybe it wasn't perfect, but it got the job done. In the end, this may just be another great illustration of a fact well known and loathed by lawyers, scientists and other metaphysicians (a word I incidentally still dislike, if you're reading this, Dan 
): Things we can PROVE are only a subset of the much larger group of things we KNOW. God's not dead, but the Great Watchmaker died a long time ago with Schrödingers Cat.
): Things we can PROVE are only a subset of the much larger group of things we KNOW. God's not dead, but the Great Watchmaker died a long time ago with Schrödingers Cat.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1236 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
875 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
996 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
996 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
951 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
959 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
799 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
1017 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
1046 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
945 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
987 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
997 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
1060 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
934 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
993 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
1048 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
877 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
873 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
992 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
396 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
920 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
961 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
971 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
1004 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
982 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
1012 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
413 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
413 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
441 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
441 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
978 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
1110 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
855 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
1082 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
907 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
965 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
881 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
1032 Views