No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
Joel Send a noteboard - 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
So maybe it wasn't perfect, but it got the job done. In the end, this may just be another great illustration of a fact well known and loathed by lawyers, scientists and other metaphysicians (a word I incidentally still dislike, if you're reading this, Dan 
): Things we can PROVE are only a subset of the much larger group of things we KNOW. God's not dead, but the Great Watchmaker died a long time ago with Schrödingers Cat.
): Things we can PROVE are only a subset of the much larger group of things we KNOW. God's not dead, but the Great Watchmaker died a long time ago with Schrödingers Cat.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Natural selection
- 06/08/2011 03:51:26 PM
1269 Views
selection for suitability
- 06/08/2011 04:18:51 PM
916 Views
Thanks for your responce 
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
1039 Views
- 06/08/2011 04:41:20 PM
1039 Views
I can't speak for LadyLorraine and won't try, but here's how I see it:
- 06/08/2011 06:49:49 PM
986 Views
Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:18:09 PM
999 Views
Yes it can
- 06/08/2011 07:41:59 PM
836 Views
But how?
- 06/08/2011 07:52:10 PM
1061 Views
Re: Just a question
- 06/08/2011 07:49:21 PM
1079 Views
I'm not sure I understand you
- 06/08/2011 08:20:44 PM
983 Views
All tautologies are truisms, but not all truisms are tautologies.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:12 PM
1013 Views
Then it is still a tautology
- 06/08/2011 09:45:33 PM
1047 Views
You can know it's beneifical to a particular individual, but it's harder to say for populations.
- 06/08/2011 10:18:16 PM
1090 Views
Maybe...
- 07/08/2011 01:55:54 PM
966 Views
I'm more inclined toward his logic, but possibly toward your conclusions.
- 09/08/2011 12:45:46 AM
1021 Views
we can't really know ahead of time what makes a specific trait benefical in that environment
- 09/08/2011 06:16:02 PM
1079 Views
As I understand it
- 06/08/2011 06:04:44 PM
917 Views
Better...
- 06/08/2011 06:36:38 PM
908 Views
Did you perhaps mean "beneficial in the environment" rather than "beneficial to the environment"?
- 06/08/2011 06:34:44 PM
1022 Views
yes. I did not really phrase that very clearly. *NM*
- 09/08/2011 06:14:11 PM
410 Views
No biggy; from what Bram said, I underestimated how well you were understood anyway.
- 09/08/2011 06:45:16 PM
952 Views
Hmmm... there's some truth to that
- 06/08/2011 06:36:35 PM
1010 Views
The complexity of the problem makes it all but impossible to falsify...
- 06/08/2011 08:26:06 PM
1005 Views
The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 08:38:31 PM
1039 Views
Re: The questions go deeper
- 06/08/2011 09:10:32 PM
1009 Views
I think I know why you don't understand my question.
- 06/08/2011 09:38:41 PM
1049 Views
How many equation's has Moraine screwed up? 
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
427 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:45:36 PM
427 Views
100% I think Moriaine is a very beneficial trait that contributes a lot to the RAFO pool *NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
457 Views
*NM*
- 06/08/2011 09:46:54 PM
457 Views
Re: Natural selection
- 07/08/2011 03:00:30 AM
1012 Views
Thanks a lot
- 07/08/2011 01:38:39 PM
1141 Views
2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:00:35 PM
890 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 04:33:00 PM
1114 Views
Re: 2 things
- 07/08/2011 05:48:26 PM
944 Views
My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:00:28 PM
1005 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:37:58 PM
912 Views
Re: My best guess
- 07/08/2011 06:47:26 PM
1064 Views