1) Only 1 university has done this. Thus you can't really argue this is a trend
2) This is a private organization since it is a private school, thus no state funds are directly funding it.
3) They are doing it for it is a receipt of success, via standing out. They are the only university in the US to do this, thus they are standing out via asking this question. It is a "signaling mechanism"
a) They are a private university who are competing for "talent," trying to get wealthy kids to go to their institution. Even if the kid is straight he may fell more likely to go to this school for it is inclusive, and he/she may see the school as more liberal, modern, and cosmopolitan. Or a closeted gay boy/girl who is still stuck in a hell that is high school may feel safe.
When you only have 3,400 undergrads and 230 grads students, an increase of 200 hundred students is an 6% increase in revenue. (And with tuition costing 30k a year, 200 additional students is 6 million more revenue a year.)
b) It is another way for the school to recruit funds from private donors/past alumni. Look how liberal, modern, cosmopolitan we are.
When you are one of many thousands of organizations, some times it pays to stand out. Elmhurst needs to be peoples 1st pick to succeed, no one spends 30k a year on a university to be a 2nd choice pick. Elmhurst needs stories to tell to get people excited to be there besides them being a liberal art school, and only 30 mins from downtown chicago and 25 mins away from Chicago O Hare.
2) This is a private organization since it is a private school, thus no state funds are directly funding it.
3) They are doing it for it is a receipt of success, via standing out. They are the only university in the US to do this, thus they are standing out via asking this question. It is a "signaling mechanism"
a) They are a private university who are competing for "talent," trying to get wealthy kids to go to their institution. Even if the kid is straight he may fell more likely to go to this school for it is inclusive, and he/she may see the school as more liberal, modern, and cosmopolitan. Or a closeted gay boy/girl who is still stuck in a hell that is high school may feel safe.
When you only have 3,400 undergrads and 230 grads students, an increase of 200 hundred students is an 6% increase in revenue. (And with tuition costing 30k a year, 200 additional students is 6 million more revenue a year.)
b) It is another way for the school to recruit funds from private donors/past alumni. Look how liberal, modern, cosmopolitan we are.
When you are one of many thousands of organizations, some times it pays to stand out. Elmhurst needs to be peoples 1st pick to succeed, no one spends 30k a year on a university to be a 2nd choice pick. Elmhurst needs stories to tell to get people excited to be there besides them being a liberal art school, and only 30 mins from downtown chicago and 25 mins away from Chicago O Hare.
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left
- 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM
1142 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy.
- 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM
737 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article
- 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM
653 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter.
- 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
725 Views
Ummm, did you read the article?
- 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM
801 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either
- 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM
780 Views
But that's just a scholarship.
- 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM
762 Views
so you would OK if the only offered it to straight students? *NM*
- 25/08/2011 09:50:44 PM
286 Views
You do realize that there are indeed universities refusing admission to gay students?
- 25/08/2011 10:02:41 PM
623 Views
I would have no problem with a LGBT only school as long as it didn't take state money
- 25/08/2011 10:27:48 PM
705 Views
This is a private university, not a state university *NM*
- 25/08/2011 10:29:15 PM
317 Views
sorry that ended with NM. Were you trying to make a point if so I missed it *NM*
- 25/08/2011 10:40:48 PM
334 Views
I expect some donor created a scholarship with that stipulation.
- 25/08/2011 10:40:09 PM
730 Views
I know my reply to his message may have made in seem that I was objecting to the scholarship
- 25/08/2011 11:10:33 PM
748 Views
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that.
- 26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM
681 Views
I don't really have a problem with this
- 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM
798 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it
- 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM
656 Views
Fair Enough
- 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM
699 Views
The United Church of Christ is a rather liberal denomination - celebrating gay marriages, notably.
- 25/08/2011 10:06:26 PM
659 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity
- 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM
814 Views
well. It could be they just needed a reason, but for some reason couldn't be forthright?
- 26/08/2011 03:28:52 AM
653 Views
One of your lines struck me.
- 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM
802 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result
- 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
626 Views
That's an interesting point...
- 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM
725 Views
yes but but despite how much he was hated by the left the right saw him different
- 25/08/2011 11:32:19 PM
838 Views
Re: yes but but despite how much he was hated by the left the right saw him different
- 26/08/2011 09:57:13 PM
726 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result
- 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM
755 Views
I don't think most people believed Obama was a centrist so much as the anti-Bush
- 26/08/2011 12:40:43 AM
669 Views
I think you'll find very few Europeans agreeing with that assessment.
- 26/08/2011 10:18:19 PM
649 Views
Wow what a strawman
- 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM
814 Views
- 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM
814 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman
- 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM
608 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired
- 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM
785 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity.
- 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM
620 Views
- 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM
620 Views
I would definetly check "yes"
- 26/08/2011 12:11:29 AM
800 Views
but if they wanted to increase diversity they would offer yo a scholarship for being Muslim
- 26/08/2011 12:46:46 AM
656 Views
- 26/08/2011 12:46:46 AM
656 Views
id be a gay muslim, so Id be 3 minorities, a woman, a muslim and a lesbian, now if only I was black!
- 26/08/2011 02:16:50 AM
724 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"...
- 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM
743 Views
a question for you...
- 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM
888 Views
I guess my question for you is how I made it sound like LGBT=liberal
- 26/08/2011 09:47:16 PM
647 Views
My guess is because you referenced "the lefts" fuzzy logic in a thread about a LGBT scholarship.
- 26/08/2011 11:07:32 PM
812 Views
