Active Users:1445 Time:19/10/2025 06:55:36 AM
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM
And not just because the phenomenon you describe results in a lot of those poor whites you reference refusing to support or even actively opposing social empowerment because they know it won't help them anyway. I've often accused the power brokers of engaging in divide and conquer tactics, but the fact is minority preferences and quotas do much of the job for them. Nothing better demonstrates that than the fact a college application question about sexual orientation would be unthinkable if it were meant to discriminate AGAINST homosexuals but is somehow acceptable if it seeks to discriminate against EVERYONE ELSE (as such preferential treatment effectively does).

So clearly it's not "unthinkable".
Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1128 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 721 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 731 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 772 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 639 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 609 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 709 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 738 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 787 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 767 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 748 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 730 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 782 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 641 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 685 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 802 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 789 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 613 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 710 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 740 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 613 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 799 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 592 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 773 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 739 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 606 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 656 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 728 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 667 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 778 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 870 Views

Reply to Message