Active Users:572 Time:01/07/2025 09:39:30 AM
I know my reply to his message may have made in seem that I was objecting to the scholarship random thoughts Send a noteboard - 25/08/2011 11:10:33 PM
but like I said elsewhere I don't object to them offering a scholarship to students who are GLBT. I object to them doing it under the guise of diversity when the group is already over represented. I was using it as an example of the fuzzy logic used on the left. If they were honest with their goal, to increase diversity, they would use their scholarship money to attract under represented groups or groups that would not normally be drawn to their school.

Reply to message
A fine example of the fuzzy logic of the left - 25/08/2011 06:30:36 PM 1098 Views
Personally I still favor demographic blind subsidies as the best route to meritocracy. - 25/08/2011 08:18:20 PM 688 Views
it works for gender as well - 25/08/2011 09:02:58 PM 699 Views
Sure; insert your demographic here. - 26/08/2011 12:51:48 AM 741 Views
Preferential in possible scholarships but not admissions process according to the article - 25/08/2011 10:26:25 PM 606 Views
What's your point? - 26/08/2011 12:54:41 AM 577 Views
There are colleges that don't allow homosexuals - or men, or women for that matter. - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 679 Views
Alright then, socially unacceptable. - 26/08/2011 01:00:16 AM 711 Views
Ummm, did you read the article? - 25/08/2011 08:40:46 PM 756 Views
Ah, but you are not reading it either - 25/08/2011 08:53:39 PM 735 Views
But that's just a scholarship. - 25/08/2011 09:34:23 PM 719 Views
so you would OK if the only offered it to straight students? *NM* - 25/08/2011 09:50:44 PM 260 Views
I expect some donor created a scholarship with that stipulation. - 25/08/2011 10:40:09 PM 681 Views
I know my reply to his message may have made in seem that I was objecting to the scholarship - 25/08/2011 11:10:33 PM 701 Views
If you're talking about "affirmative action", then yes, I oppose that. - 26/08/2011 09:19:33 AM 637 Views
no I was talking about feel good solutions to imaginary problems - 26/08/2011 01:38:33 PM 705 Views
it is a scholarship program not a admissions program - 25/08/2011 09:12:47 PM 699 Views
I don't really have a problem with this - 25/08/2011 09:03:55 PM 752 Views
I am not arguing that they shouldn't be allowed to do it - 25/08/2011 09:29:54 PM 606 Views
Fair Enough - 25/08/2011 09:41:25 PM 654 Views
their stated motive was to increase diversity - 25/08/2011 10:09:17 PM 769 Views
One of your lines struck me. - 25/08/2011 10:12:32 PM 758 Views
that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:35:05 PM 582 Views
That's an interesting point... - 25/08/2011 10:37:37 PM 677 Views
Re: that happened in the US, we elected Bush as a result - 25/08/2011 10:55:29 PM 702 Views
It's also worth noting ... - 25/08/2011 11:00:35 PM 581 Views
Wow what a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:23:45 PM 763 Views
yes to bad none of that address the point I was making which would make your argument a strawman - 25/08/2011 10:40:01 PM 558 Views
No I do not believe they are needed, nor do I believe they should be desired - 25/08/2011 10:47:51 PM 741 Views
so you don't disagree with me or you do? - 25/08/2011 11:47:05 PM 702 Views
Ridiculous. Everyone knows conservatives are incapable of creativity. - 25/08/2011 11:12:10 PM 574 Views
are they going to make students prove they are GLBT? - 25/08/2011 11:36:58 PM 628 Views
I think it's less a failing of the "left"... - 26/08/2011 03:25:42 AM 692 Views
I agree there is a lot of fuzzy logic on the right as well - 26/08/2011 02:41:03 PM 636 Views
*nod* I don't deny that it's a problem - 26/08/2011 04:26:56 PM 747 Views
a question for you... - 26/08/2011 08:08:10 PM 830 Views

Reply to Message