Joel, I think I'm done with this unless you want to do some research.
Aemon Send a noteboard - 18/01/2012 02:53:19 AM
As I, ghav, and beetnemesis have pointed out, SOPA and PIPA have absolutely nothing to do with national security or "hacking" of any sort. The fact that you've been arguing that angle in most of your posts here reveals to me that:
1) You have not read the bills, or summaries of the bills, or wikipedia pages, or anything else. It's not that you don't understand the pros and cons; you don't even understand the central issue.
2) You lack a fundamental understanding of how the internet works and how it's used for. . .well, any purpose. Defense, piracy, commerce, etc.
And you know what? That's fine. I'm not trying to put you down or say that you have to be current on every tech issue out there. It's not your area of expertise, and I have no problem with that. However, I'm also not going to waste any more time talking about this with you until you learn a little more about what's going on.
1) You have not read the bills, or summaries of the bills, or wikipedia pages, or anything else. It's not that you don't understand the pros and cons; you don't even understand the central issue.
2) You lack a fundamental understanding of how the internet works and how it's used for. . .well, any purpose. Defense, piracy, commerce, etc.
And you know what? That's fine. I'm not trying to put you down or say that you have to be current on every tech issue out there. It's not your area of expertise, and I have no problem with that. However, I'm also not going to waste any more time talking about this with you until you learn a little more about what's going on.
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout
- 17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM
2196 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right?
- 17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM
1018 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"? 
- 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM
1135 Views
- 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM
1135 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills?
- 17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM
1232 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much
- 17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM
1084 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter. 
- 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM
1186 Views
- 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM
1186 Views
I love you. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM
672 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once. 
*NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM
655 Views
*NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM
655 Views
Can i second the adulation?
- 18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM
902 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM
653 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill.
- 18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM
1086 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this.
- 18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM
999 Views
Also, in the case of the OPEN Act, it has not "been proposed for months."
- 18/01/2012 07:28:15 PM
1500 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please.
- 18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM
1097 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary.
- 18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM
1087 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now.
- 18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM
1102 Views
OK.
- 18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM
1128 Views
should be interesting
- 17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM
957 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors.
- 17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM
1027 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding.
- 17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM
1033 Views
So tell them that.
- 17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM
1187 Views
Joel, I think I'm done with this unless you want to do some research.
- 18/01/2012 02:53:19 AM
993 Views
Research would tell me what is wrong with these bills and how a good bill should look.
- 18/01/2012 11:22:46 AM
1105 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good.
- 17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM
950 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust.
- 17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM
1095 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright?
- 18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM
946 Views
There seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM
1052 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM
947 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 10:27:32 PM
1209 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap.
- 18/01/2012 11:30:39 PM
1050 Views
Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable.
- 19/01/2012 04:08:58 PM
1074 Views
Re: Just because the news does not mention something does not automatically make it non-applicable.
- 19/01/2012 10:39:40 PM
1063 Views
If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed.
- 20/01/2012 09:12:29 PM
1335 Views
Re: If you re-read your last sentence it should be clear why this law is being pushed.
- 21/01/2012 03:19:49 AM
951 Views
Er, what Ghav said.
- 18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM
962 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments.
- 18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM
1017 Views
Okay, another analogy:
- 18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM
959 Views
The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision.
- 18/01/2012 03:31:20 PM
1013 Views
what they SHOULD do is stop taking money from proponents of sopa/pipa
- 18/01/2012 03:51:09 PM
1080 Views
Yes, they should, but, once again, that approach will not prevent a new law.
- 18/01/2012 04:05:02 PM
1082 Views
Re: The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision.
- 18/01/2012 04:27:30 PM
1042 Views
If the US government wants to summarily block sites within the US, it already can and will.
- 18/01/2012 06:15:53 PM
986 Views
You know all this anti-SOPA bullshit is making me hope the bill passes.
- 18/01/2012 04:00:17 AM
1048 Views
I would not go THAT far; it seems clear these bills have many objectionable provisions.
- 18/01/2012 11:41:23 AM
1069 Views
Re: I would not go THAT far; it seems clear these bills have many objectionable provisions.
- 19/01/2012 01:57:46 AM
897 Views
Yeah, the extreme bias on both sides is why the bills will likely pass more or less as written.
- 19/01/2012 03:31:52 PM
1086 Views
joel, you need to consider three things
- 18/01/2012 06:06:16 AM
1046 Views
You need to consider that they WILL pass some legislation, and what you want it to contain.
- 18/01/2012 12:15:38 PM
1092 Views
again, it's not about piracy, it's about protecting the mpaa/riaa business model at our expense
- 18/01/2012 03:34:32 PM
1170 Views
Yeah, see, that is the problem: "it's not about piracy."
- 18/01/2012 03:57:55 PM
1000 Views
if piracy is such a problem then the mpaa/riaa need to PROVE their losses
- 19/01/2012 02:43:31 AM
995 Views
How do you expect anyone to prove what people WOULD HAVE bought if they could not just take it?
- 19/01/2012 03:57:24 PM
1308 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP
- 18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM
972 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin."
- 18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM
1228 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me
- 18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM
845 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation.
- 18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM
1073 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation
- 18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM
990 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else.
- 18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM
976 Views
Strike three.
- 18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM
1041 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing.
- 18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM
849 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me
- 18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM
1115 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no.
- 18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM
952 Views
About "proposing new legislation"
- 18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM
1104 Views
So true
- 18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM
1049 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation"
- 18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM
1184 Views
Hm, you should read my post one above about combatting online piracy.
- 18/01/2012 06:20:16 PM
1133 Views
I would not recommend photocopying a book and handing it out on street corners.
- 18/01/2012 06:45:52 PM
1065 Views
Not to blame, neccessarily. But you have to live in the real world.
- 18/01/2012 07:31:18 PM
978 Views
Re: Not to blame, neccessarily. But you have to live in the real world.
- 18/01/2012 08:55:59 PM
1064 Views
I always liked the codewheels SSI provided with copies of their Gold Box AD&D games.
- 18/01/2012 10:07:40 PM
1193 Views
These are really different arguments
- 19/01/2012 12:05:10 AM
969 Views
TV is slightly different, because regional availability becomes a factor.
- 19/01/2012 04:18:58 PM
963 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM*
- 18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM
699 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM
691 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM
559 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM
686 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM
497 Views
I really don't see the fun in that. Wikipedia is just a tool, not a game. *NM*
- 19/01/2012 04:59:14 AM
599 Views
I don't know about those (except French), but none of the ones I ever used are remotely as good. *NM*
- 18/01/2012 08:13:47 PM
681 Views
Russian wikipedia is very good if you're not checking some obscure Western cultural phenomena.
- 19/01/2012 01:57:43 AM
1139 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia...
- 19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM
1069 Views
Re: Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... *NM*
- 19/01/2012 01:34:46 AM
724 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students! 
- 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM
1118 Views
- 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM
1118 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA.
- 19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM
1082 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place?
- 20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM
1175 Views