Active Users:1204 Time:29/09/2026 07:20:50 PM
Not to go off on a tangent about combatting piracy... beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 18/01/2012 05:38:12 PM
But, looking at recent years, it seems like the only way to combat piracy is to make "legal" downloading more convenient than piracy. It's basically a given at this point that you can't create a file secure enough that it can't be hacked. And anti-piracy measures often become counter-productive: special keys and codes you need to save, needing your computer be always connected to the internet, only allowing a buyer to re-download a few times before his purchase "expires," restricting the ways you can use what you've bought. These things don't exist on pirated versions, so it just makes people more willing to pirate.

Music: iTunes isn't perfect, but it's been a step in the right direction. iTunes allows you to get the music you want quickly, safely, and relatively cheaply. It needs some work on DRM- if I buy a song, I want to do whatever the hell I want with it- but it's a good step.

Games: If you don't play video games, you've probably never heard of Steam. Steam is a computer program that acts as a kind of a super-iTunes for video games- you have a staggering library to browse through, and things are often cheap or on sale.

Amazingly though, Steam has very little DRM. Your games are saved to your account, and you can install them and uninstall them as much as you want. You need to be online to buy and download the game, but once it's on your computer, that's all. Moreover, Steam is well-known for customer service and ease-of-use.

I used to pirate a TON of games back in the day. Various reasons, sometimes I couldn't afford it, sometimes I couldn't find it, sometimes I was lazy, etc. Steam fixes a lot of those problems. 90% of the games on Steam I probably could have gotten for free if I had tried really hard to pirate them, but that's the key- "try really hard." Do I really want to spend an entire day downloading various disc images and CD keys and patches? Or do I want to click 2 buttons and be done with it?

Movies/TV Again, this comes down to ease-of-use. People want to watch what they want, when they want. With Tivo, Netflix, and more importantly, the Internet, they can. I LOVE watching professional-grade episodes of shows on network web sites. Only problem? The networks are often terrible about archiving.

If I want to watch something from Season 2 of Archer, legally? Out of luck. Can't find it on the network's site. Netflix doesn't have it. The DVD isn't for sale.

But, oh look, I can go to any number of unauthorized streaming sites, and watch it. So again, "pirating" means I have to search through dozens of shady links of poor quality before finding what I want.


Maybe Joel or others will say, "it's not for sale, it's their IP, too bad." To them I say, you're living in a dream world. It's 2012. If it exists, you can get it online. The only demonstrated way to reduce piracy is to make it convenient to obtain something legally.


(Which, as I think has been mentioned in a previous post, is why SOPA is a failure on multiple levels- it wouldn't even stop piracy)



The "we must stamp out piracy at all costs!" mindset of the older studios, while understandable, isn't particularly productive. The way to deal with the problem is to figure out where the new markets are (the Internet) and how best to deal with them (by making thing as open and easy as possible).
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout - 17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM 2428 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right? - 17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM 1248 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"? - 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM 1343 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills? - 17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM 1455 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much - 17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM 1312 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter. - 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM 1404 Views
I love you. *NM* - 18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM 782 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM 758 Views
Can i second the adulation? - 18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM 1105 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM 748 Views
Thanks guys. - 18/01/2012 04:39:00 AM 1278 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill. - 18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM 1299 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this. - 18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM 1199 Views
That is really all I ask. - 18/01/2012 06:26:37 PM 1305 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please. - 18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM 1320 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary. - 18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM 1321 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now. - 18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM 1311 Views
OK. - 18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM 1372 Views
Surreal. It's like you're a spam-bot or something. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:23:35 AM 887 Views
That was constructive. - 19/01/2012 03:29:53 PM 1222 Views
Very nicely summarised. *NM* - 18/01/2012 02:06:02 AM 689 Views
should be interesting - 17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM 1180 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors. - 17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM 1251 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding. - 17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM 1244 Views
So tell them that. - 17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM 1408 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good. - 17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM 1155 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust. - 17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM 1306 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright? - 18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM 1158 Views
There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM 1293 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM 1186 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 10:27:32 PM 1451 Views
Er, what Ghav said. - 18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM 1212 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments. - 18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM 1230 Views
Okay, another analogy: - 18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM 1213 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP - 18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM 1206 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin." - 18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM 1439 Views
wow, you are totally correct! - 18/01/2012 03:45:54 PM 1193 Views
That is a separate issue. - 18/01/2012 04:01:24 PM 1200 Views
Thank you for posting that. - 18/01/2012 03:09:07 PM 1235 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me - 18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM 1067 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation. - 18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM 1277 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation - 18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM 1197 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else. - 18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM 1176 Views
Strike three. - 18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM 1317 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing. - 18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM 1057 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me - 18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM 1336 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM 1194 Views
Re: Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 19/01/2012 12:15:48 AM 1256 Views
That is a poor approach to drafting legislation, at best. - 19/01/2012 04:37:22 PM 1281 Views
About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM 1311 Views
So true - 18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM 1270 Views
Not to go off on a tangent about combatting piracy... - 18/01/2012 05:38:12 PM 1184 Views
Entirely agree *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:13:13 PM 744 Views
That was an excellent post. *NM* - 19/01/2012 11:18:19 PM 736 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM 1411 Views
Hm, you should read my post one above about combatting online piracy. - 18/01/2012 06:20:16 PM 1365 Views
For those who want a short, one page explanation... - 18/01/2012 05:41:49 PM 1203 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM 810 Views
We get it: You are a polyglot. - 18/01/2012 06:27:48 PM 1178 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM 794 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM 656 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM 786 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM 587 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... - 19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM 1289 Views
They all did it on twitter - 19/01/2012 01:26:19 AM 1229 Views
I was asleep much of the day - 19/01/2012 02:40:11 AM 1282 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students! - 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM 1327 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA. - 19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM 1316 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place? - 20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM 1390 Views
a joke can, indeed, be rebutted... - 21/01/2012 09:07:32 PM 1297 Views
Oh, draggie, I ALWAYS see what you do there. - 21/01/2012 10:01:58 PM 1240 Views

Reply to Message