Active Users:615 Time:29/06/2026 08:03:30 AM
NO - you are still wrong on this point moondog Send a noteboard - 19/01/2012 02:38:14 AM
the US government does NOT have the power to block content on any website. the US government does not even currently have the power to prevent someone from accessing websites it does not want them to access. the only power the US government currently possesses is the ability to remove the operations of websites which provide specifically illegal activities through law enforcement methods. NOT because some hollywood executive slipped a few million dollars into a senators pocket but real, honest to god, information gathering and analysis of data. the bills in question would give all these powers and more to the US government, but it does not currently have this power now.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa

"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
Reply to message
English Wikipedia Anti-SOPA Blackout - 17/01/2012 08:31:46 AM 2374 Views
Yeah, man, because currently copyright holders have no recourse, am I right? - 17/01/2012 11:47:35 AM 1198 Views
"altering the infrastructure of the Internet so as to render RAFO virtually inaccessible"? - 17/01/2012 08:12:27 PM 1284 Views
I'll go ahead and ask before I get my panties in a bunch: do you understand these bills? - 17/01/2012 09:09:22 PM 1397 Views
I admit I have not looked into it much - 17/01/2012 11:42:30 PM 1257 Views
And yet you're still arguing the matter. - 18/01/2012 02:34:04 AM 1354 Views
I love you. *NM* - 18/01/2012 03:41:03 AM 756 Views
heh, thanks. I usually find myself pushing minority opinions. Nice to be "appreciated" for once. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:01:10 AM 728 Views
Can i second the adulation? - 18/01/2012 04:07:17 AM 1060 Views
I too (three?) appreciate the common sense and reasonable explanations. *NM* - 18/01/2012 04:12:59 AM 716 Views
Thanks guys. - 18/01/2012 04:39:00 AM 1231 Views
Right, because the argument is not just over THIS bill but, apparently, over ANY bill. - 18/01/2012 11:09:13 AM 1247 Views
Alternatives to SOPA/PIPA have been proposed for months now. Please stop arguing this. - 18/01/2012 05:42:10 PM 1151 Views
That is really all I ask. - 18/01/2012 06:26:37 PM 1250 Views
"sensitive federal content"? Provide a source justifying this claim and it's relevance, please. - 18/01/2012 05:59:47 PM 1276 Views
I would not have thought a source necessary. - 18/01/2012 06:24:44 PM 1268 Views
Okay, I'm with Aemon now. - 18/01/2012 07:36:21 PM 1256 Views
OK. - 18/01/2012 10:16:16 PM 1299 Views
Surreal. It's like you're a spam-bot or something. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:23:35 AM 858 Views
That was constructive. - 19/01/2012 03:29:53 PM 1173 Views
Very nicely summarised. *NM* - 18/01/2012 02:06:02 AM 656 Views
should be interesting - 17/01/2012 12:41:47 PM 1126 Views
Could be; depends on a lot of factors. - 17/01/2012 07:38:55 PM 1196 Views
See, that's one of the biggest problems that people aren't understanding. - 17/01/2012 09:31:38 PM 1197 Views
So tell them that. - 17/01/2012 11:54:19 PM 1354 Views
Could've done without the snide rejoinder, but, good. - 17/01/2012 02:20:08 PM 1101 Views
I love the black banner, like some kind of internet Holocaust. - 17/01/2012 08:03:27 PM 1253 Views
Are you aware that SOPA/PIPA has nothing to do with hackers and everything to do with copyright? - 18/01/2012 02:08:56 AM 1105 Views
There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 01:08:22 PM 1236 Views
Re: There seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 08:13:15 PM 1134 Views
Re: There still seems to be some overlap. - 18/01/2012 10:27:32 PM 1394 Views
Er, what Ghav said. - 18/01/2012 02:30:37 AM 1162 Views
Sorry, protecting Pirate Bay and offshore gambling are not compelling counterarguments. - 18/01/2012 11:38:08 AM 1177 Views
Okay, another analogy: - 18/01/2012 02:04:12 PM 1152 Views
The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision. - 18/01/2012 03:31:20 PM 1180 Views
Re: The devil is always in the details, and it seems clear the details need great revision. - 18/01/2012 04:27:30 PM 1198 Views
If the US government wants to summarily block sites within the US, it already can and will. - 18/01/2012 06:15:53 PM 1165 Views
NO - you are still wrong on this point - 19/01/2012 02:38:14 AM 1146 Views
Power, or authority? - 19/01/2012 03:41:24 PM 1216 Views
A technical examination of SOPA and PROTECT IP - 18/01/2012 08:32:44 AM 1153 Views
"As a disclaimer, I am not a lawyer, I'm a sysadmin." - 18/01/2012 12:47:16 PM 1385 Views
wow, you are totally correct! - 18/01/2012 03:45:54 PM 1139 Views
That is a separate issue. - 18/01/2012 04:01:24 PM 1152 Views
Thank you for posting that. - 18/01/2012 03:09:07 PM 1187 Views
Wikipedia has already convinced me - 18/01/2012 03:26:01 PM 1012 Views
Trying to stop this legislation without proposing an alternative is trying to stop ANY legislation. - 18/01/2012 03:44:18 PM 1223 Views
It isn't their job to propose legislation - 18/01/2012 04:12:53 PM 1140 Views
No, but they have as much RIGHT to do so as anyone else. - 18/01/2012 05:31:55 PM 1125 Views
Strike three. - 18/01/2012 05:37:55 PM 1246 Views
That is fine; that is what people SHOULD be doing. - 18/01/2012 06:03:59 PM 1014 Views
Things being better now than they would be under SOPA seems like a legitimate argument to me - 18/01/2012 09:04:18 PM 1274 Views
Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 18/01/2012 10:46:48 PM 1140 Views
Re: Against SOPA, sure; against ANY new law, no. - 19/01/2012 12:15:48 AM 1200 Views
That is a poor approach to drafting legislation, at best. - 19/01/2012 04:37:22 PM 1228 Views
About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 04:45:08 PM 1263 Views
So true - 18/01/2012 05:08:45 PM 1210 Views
Not to go off on a tangent about combatting piracy... - 18/01/2012 05:38:12 PM 1134 Views
Entirely agree *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:13:13 PM 716 Views
That was an excellent post. *NM* - 19/01/2012 11:18:19 PM 710 Views
Re: About "proposing new legislation" - 18/01/2012 05:59:55 PM 1360 Views
Hm, you should read my post one above about combatting online piracy. - 18/01/2012 06:20:16 PM 1293 Views
For those who want a short, one page explanation... - 18/01/2012 05:41:49 PM 1159 Views
Yeah, so I use Russian wikipedia for a day. Or German wikipedia, or French, or Italian... *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:23:36 PM 780 Views
We get it: You are a polyglot. - 18/01/2012 06:27:48 PM 1129 Views
Or just hit stop right before the script runs. *NM* - 18/01/2012 06:52:40 PM 764 Views
Or just disable Java. *NM* - 19/01/2012 01:58:03 AM 628 Views
That's not as much fun though. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:13:44 AM 756 Views
Exactly, this way its kind of a game. *NM* - 19/01/2012 02:20:37 AM 562 Views
Or Answers.com, or even the actual sources that are often copy/pasted into Wikipedia... - 19/01/2012 01:07:38 AM 1233 Views
They all did it on twitter - 19/01/2012 01:26:19 AM 1170 Views
I was asleep much of the day - 19/01/2012 02:40:11 AM 1230 Views
Oh, no; now Congress will be inundated with complaints from lazy college students! - 19/01/2012 04:40:12 PM 1275 Views
13 previously unopposed senators now do not support SOPA. - 19/01/2012 11:36:15 PM 1254 Views
How does that "rebutt" what was a facetious post in the first place? - 20/01/2012 09:24:27 PM 1328 Views
a joke can, indeed, be rebutted... - 21/01/2012 09:07:32 PM 1248 Views
Oh, draggie, I ALWAYS see what you do there. - 21/01/2012 10:01:58 PM 1196 Views

Reply to Message