Active Users:81 Time:26/11/2015 03:58:16 PM
Two days ago the White House said it would not back down from requiring school/hospital compliance. Joel Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 01:57:50 AM
See the WaPo article below.

And here’s how it works after the compromise: “Our policy is saying that the Catholic hospital doesn’t want to cover contraceptives, and they don’t include that in their policy. It also says that Aetna needs to provide contraceptive services for free to workers in the plan. Aetna sets the premium, but it cannot be higher than it would have been without birth control. The premium does not include contraception.”

And, in the end, that leaves Aetna with the bill. “There is a sort of bank account,” says the official, “and Aetna is sucking it up.”

That sounds good, but the White House says a lot of things; in 2008 Obama said Democrats should nominate him instead of Hillary because his healthcare plan did not carry a public mandate and hers did.

"Aetna sets the premium, but it cannot be higher than it would have been without birth control." Just how are they verifying that? Remember, these are the same people who proudly declared health insurance available to everyone because they removed insurer freedom to deny coverage—WITHOUT establishing the very kind of price restrictions mentioned here, thereby allowing insurers to price people out of the market rather than denying them coverage outright. One of the healthcare "reforms" most critical failings is the near total absence of anything to slow, let alone halt or reverse, the growth in prices. Since they have done a complete 180° on this issue in just 48 hours, I will not believe that statement any more than I believed the last one until they demonstrate its veracity. Talk is cheap; it almost has to be with Obamas policies, because there is nothing to them BUT talk.

Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up - 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM 808 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM 198 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor - 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM 149 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well. - 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM 240 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM 125 Views
Is there really such a thing? *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:11:30 PM 108 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post. - 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM 233 Views
The subject line didn't help. *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:04:11 PM 110 Views
But it added some flair to the discussion! *NM* - 09/02/2012 07:46:47 PM 99 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM 100 Views
It's one thing to have a bias. - 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM 193 Views
Some would say putting a spotlight on it is more honest. *NM* - 09/02/2012 09:34:17 PM 98 Views
Ah, the Rupert Murdoch School of Objectivity. - 09/02/2012 10:15:57 PM 142 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms. - 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM 167 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly. - 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM 170 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention? - 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM 158 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote. - 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM 143 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course. - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM 128 Views
Bullshit. - 11/02/2012 04:29:31 AM 165 Views
A vote for no one is a vote for more BS. - 11/02/2012 05:55:11 AM 182 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end. - 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM 292 Views
He is already preparing to cave. - 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM 182 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said. - 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM 149 Views
"And here I thought he was just another politician." - 10/02/2012 01:29:36 PM 138 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved. - 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM 218 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM* - 10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM 116 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer." - 11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM 235 Views
Then that article is wrong. - 11/02/2012 01:43:40 AM 229 Views
Two days ago the White House said it would not back down from requiring school/hospital compliance. - 11/02/2012 01:57:50 AM 231 Views
So in summary... the article you posted was wrong. - 11/02/2012 02:18:00 AM 171 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions? - 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM 170 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs. - 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM 185 Views
Money is not the same as speech! - 10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM 175 Views
One last point - 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM 151 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes. - 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM 140 Views
You argument does not make sense - 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM 196 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency. - 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM 152 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality - 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM 161 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM 153 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM 129 Views
In other words, I could. - 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM 107 Views
Some more points - 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM 172 Views
Sex is not a necessity either. - 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM 165 Views
I can't believe you just said that - 11/02/2012 04:30:12 AM 126 Views
The widespread inability to believe that is deeply worrisome. - 11/02/2012 06:33:01 AM 179 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it ) - 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM 182 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained. - 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM 150 Views
The polls disagree with you. - 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM 143 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls. - 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM 169 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway - 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM 235 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is - 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM 188 Views
Nossy that was not Joel, that was me - 11/02/2012 01:56:39 PM 224 Views
I know that. - 11/02/2012 03:23:32 PM 223 Views
Understood. - 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM 169 Views
mmm... - 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM 153 Views

Reply to Message