Active Users:76 Time:23/01/2017 08:54:51 PM
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer." Joel Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM
That, according to the article I linked, is how HI (the model it says Obama is using for his surrender) deals with this. Insurance companies are not in the business of giving things away for free, and do not dispense drugs or healthcare anyway: They just pay for it, in part. If forced. Grudgingly. At great cost to policy holders. Those are the core the problems with US healthcare, and why Obamas "healthcare reform" is such an absurd misnomer.

This controversy just highlights that much deeper problem with Obamas healthcare law (or rather, the one the insurance lobby wrote and he signed.) Since the First Amendment prevents the US government forcing religious institutions to pay for things their doctrine opposes, their employees who can afford it are "free" to purchase coverage directly from insurers. "Purchasing coverage" is still a LONG way from "free medicine." It would not be free in any case, because nothing is, but a single payer plan would dramatically lower costs and increase access, as it has in every other country that adopted such a plan, without unconstitutionally forcing private entities to directly finance acts violating their religious beliefs.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up - 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM 1001 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM 253 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor - 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM 180 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well. - 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM 369 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM 254 Views
Is there really such a thing? *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:11:30 PM 185 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post. - 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM 323 Views
The subject line didn't help. *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:04:11 PM 196 Views
But it added some flair to the discussion! *NM* - 09/02/2012 07:46:47 PM 179 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM 179 Views
It's one thing to have a bias. - 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM 291 Views
Some would say putting a spotlight on it is more honest. *NM* - 09/02/2012 09:34:17 PM 157 Views
Ah, the Rupert Murdoch School of Objectivity. - 09/02/2012 10:15:57 PM 236 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms. - 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM 203 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly. - 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM 1010 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention? - 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM 1312 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote. - 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM 1261 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course. - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM 1209 Views
Bullshit. - 11/02/2012 04:29:31 AM 1295 Views
A vote for no one is a vote for more BS. - 11/02/2012 05:55:11 AM 1290 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end. - 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM 1420 Views
He is already preparing to cave. - 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM 1334 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said. - 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM 1242 Views
"And here I thought he was just another politician." - 10/02/2012 01:29:36 PM 1241 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved. - 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM 1310 Views
No, you don't have to buy it from insurers. You get it for free, just like everyone else will. *NM* - 10/02/2012 09:55:53 PM 1196 Views
"The employees can then buy the coverage directly from an insurer." - 11/02/2012 01:25:52 AM 1361 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions? - 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM 264 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs. - 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM 304 Views
Money is not the same as speech! - 10/02/2012 07:20:56 PM 205 Views
One last point - 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM 281 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes. - 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM 204 Views
You argument does not make sense - 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM 258 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency. - 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM 218 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality - 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM 278 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM 272 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM 220 Views
In other words, I could. - 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM 139 Views
Some more points - 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM 304 Views
Sex is not a necessity either. - 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM 262 Views
I can't believe you just said that - 11/02/2012 04:30:12 AM 174 Views
The widespread inability to believe that is deeply worrisome. - 11/02/2012 06:33:01 AM 298 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it ) - 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM 300 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained. - 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM 247 Views
The polls disagree with you. - 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM 214 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls. - 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM 277 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway - 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM 379 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is - 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM 285 Views
Nossy that was not Joel, that was me - 11/02/2012 01:56:39 PM 339 Views
I know that. - 11/02/2012 03:23:32 PM 334 Views
Understood. - 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM 284 Views
mmm... - 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM 262 Views

Reply to Message