Active Users:110 Time:20/10/2014 05:25:10 AM
Understood. Joel Send a noteboard - 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM
Pretty much he has done accounting math to obtain everything he wanted but get rid of the complaints.

but I do think he's accomplishing what he meant to, which is important for me. The polls aren't killing him because this is what many women (and I have to assume men?) secretly want - it infuriates me that many of them won't say this in front of their peers for fear of judgement, but it still shows that there is a silent majority in favor of affordable contraception. (I point this out as someone who has recently been discussing tooooooo much with several different types of female friends/family members. I can't say it makes me completely correct, but the comments certainly seem to support me.)

Joel, I love you, but I can no longer read your "Obama bomb" posts, so I have no idea what other discussion is happening here, and will be leaving now. You sound like triscuit. Ugh.

I cannot really blame you. I am just frustrated, disillusioned and bitter over Obama turning out to be yet another Republican Lite Democrat and what those policies are doing to the nation and world. This is not a win for womens health. That depends on insurers agreeing to offer free contraceptive coverage because 1) It makes economic sense (they would already give free coverage if it were that simple) and 2) they want in on insurance exchanges that will not exist until two years from now.

Do not hold your breath. But Obama can yet again tell progressives he delivered for us even though he actually abandoned us, and the torch-wielding villagers sick of puritanical robber barons will go out and vote for him again because "he fights for us." No one fights for us; America is every man for himself now.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
Democrats bailing on Obama - War against the Catholic Church heats up - 09/02/2012 04:03:35 AM 666 Views
This is not a war on Catholics, it is Obama being an idiot again. - 09/02/2012 04:52:01 AM 104 Views
For someone who used to be a Con Law professor - 10/02/2012 08:23:34 PM 65 Views
Also, kudos for linking to a source, and a fairly non-partisan one as well. - 09/02/2012 01:33:07 PM 118 Views
I am a non-partisan guy, so I only use unbiased sources! *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:02:50 PM 32 Views
Is there really such a thing? *NM* - 09/02/2012 04:11:30 PM 32 Views
You lost all credibility in the first line of your post. - 09/02/2012 04:49:23 PM 112 Views
The subject line didn't help. *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:04:11 PM 33 Views
But it added some flair to the discussion! *NM* - 09/02/2012 07:46:47 PM 31 Views
You actually think any of us has 'credibility' anymore in regards to neutrality? *NM* - 09/02/2012 06:46:13 PM 30 Views
It's one thing to have a bias. - 09/02/2012 07:28:51 PM 86 Views
Some would say putting a spotlight on it is more honest. *NM* - 09/02/2012 09:34:17 PM 32 Views
Ah, the Rupert Murdoch School of Objectivity. - 09/02/2012 10:15:57 PM 53 Views
Wow, talk about making a supernova out of a couple hydrogen atoms. - 09/02/2012 08:41:44 PM 79 Views
I'm somewhat suprised that Obama blundered this badly. - 10/02/2012 01:40:14 AM 75 Views
Why? Have you not been paying attention? - 10/02/2012 02:03:43 AM 68 Views
If I am not satisfied with Romney then my Plan B is to not vote. - 10/02/2012 10:58:34 PM 63 Views
How does that help anything? Except Romneys election chances, of course. - 11/02/2012 01:08:22 AM 52 Views
Bullshit. - 11/02/2012 04:29:31 AM 68 Views
A vote for no one is a vote for more BS. - 11/02/2012 05:55:11 AM 63 Views
Obama doing this actually impresses me to no end. - 10/02/2012 02:21:10 AM 158 Views
He is already preparing to cave. - 10/02/2012 02:42:32 AM 80 Views
Why are you even replying to me? What you said has little meaning to what I said. - 10/02/2012 03:33:27 AM 68 Views
"And here I thought he was just another politician." - 10/02/2012 01:29:36 PM 63 Views
Aaaaand you can put your hat back on now: Obama has already caved. - 10/02/2012 04:04:30 PM 102 Views
So Jehovah Witness employers should not have to pay for blood transfusions? - 10/02/2012 03:57:47 AM 81 Views
Not if it conflicts with their religious beliefs. - 10/02/2012 04:20:32 PM 82 Views
One last point - 10/02/2012 11:35:25 PM 56 Views
The federal government forcing private groups to facilitate without committing sin also infringes. - 11/02/2012 01:03:30 AM 53 Views
You argument does not make sense - 11/02/2012 01:26:57 AM 88 Views
It was an analogy, not an equivalency. - 11/02/2012 01:48:14 AM 58 Views
Lets enhance your analogy making it closer to reality - 11/02/2012 02:19:41 AM 67 Views
Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 03:46:33 AM 60 Views
Re: Why could I not buy it with my own money? - 11/02/2012 04:17:17 AM 50 Views
In other words, I could. - 11/02/2012 04:21:05 AM 39 Views
Some more points - 11/02/2012 02:30:27 AM 64 Views
Sex is not a necessity either. - 11/02/2012 03:56:51 AM 57 Views
I can't believe you just said that - 11/02/2012 04:30:12 AM 49 Views
The widespread inability to believe that is deeply worrisome. - 11/02/2012 06:33:01 AM 62 Views
LMAO due to Obama's compromise (the word compromise should have a in it ) - 11/02/2012 12:12:57 AM 83 Views
Obama just got two weeks of being portrayed as "anti-church" to the point even Dems complained. - 11/02/2012 02:00:28 AM 59 Views
The polls disagree with you. - 11/02/2012 02:32:59 AM 67 Views
It is an interesting article, but not for the polls. - 11/02/2012 04:18:17 AM 58 Views
I wouldn't put too much into that poll anyway - 11/02/2012 05:37:05 AM 97 Views
I don't think it's quite the laughing matter you think it is - 11/02/2012 12:31:23 PM 80 Views
Nossy that was not Joel, that was me - 11/02/2012 01:56:39 PM 114 Views
I know that. - 11/02/2012 03:23:32 PM 110 Views
Understood. - 11/02/2012 07:51:14 PM 67 Views
mmm... - 11/02/2012 08:20:26 PM 56 Views

Reply to Message