You can denigrate and defame the constitution all you wish, but it's the only reason your opinion counts for anything. We could strip away your civil liberties and make you only able to speak with a man's permission, since you are so keen on stripping away the civil liberties of others. Or, you know, not.

Policy questions, particularly those pertaining to civil liberties should NEVER be based on emotional criteria, like something making you "uncomfortable." Your tastes and preferences should not come into it, because who the hell made you god? Other people, your moral and legal equals, disagree with your position, so which of you is right?

Morally, I'd prefer the anti-gun-law types, who are not attempting to infringe on others' behavior. You are basically in favor of outlawing something, because YOU don't have in interest in that area of activity, and find it distasteful. Those who oppose gun restrictions are not trying to make any people or citizen conform to their personal preferences, they are not making people embrace an action or activity that is distasteful. They are simply asking for their legal rights and opposed to infringements on the same. You and your ilk want to impose on them, but they are not attempting to impose anything on you. By all standards of decency, that give them the moral high ground.