Active Users:790 Time:09/11/2025 08:45:41 AM
The national Olympic Committees aren't the government. Legolas Send a noteboard - 26/07/2012 12:02:43 AM
And if you seriously expect the government to go overruling its own OC when it makes a judgement call that will protect the country's reputation, on the grounds of defending the athlete's freedom of expression, you're taking idealism to a whole new level...

Of course, like I indicated in my other post, I'm personally inclined more towards the view that OCs shouldn't really be deciding who does and doesn't go to the Games, and that those who meet IOC requirements can simply go. In which case, agreed, nobody could force her to withdraw from the Games (they could pressure her tremendously, to be sure, but that's not the same thing).
Reply to message
Am I the only one who thinks Voula Papachristou should not have been kicked out of the Olympics? - 25/07/2012 10:55:19 PM 1349 Views
Being on a country's Olympic team is a privilege, not a right - 25/07/2012 11:00:24 PM 838 Views
So banning blacks would be cool if it was legal in that country? - 25/07/2012 11:08:52 PM 987 Views
If that's how the country wants to run itself - 25/07/2012 11:13:04 PM 859 Views
The IOC can ban nations from participating for that sort of stunt. - 25/07/2012 11:33:23 PM 1008 Views
So that excuses thought control? - 25/07/2012 11:49:58 PM 910 Views
If Hitler could let Jesse Owens run... - 25/07/2012 11:07:19 PM 1053 Views
Yes. Political power should not be used to enforce morals. - 25/07/2012 11:53:19 PM 791 Views
The national Olympic Committees aren't the government. - 26/07/2012 12:02:43 AM 776 Views
Even worse. - 26/07/2012 12:08:05 AM 817 Views
Erm - 26/07/2012 12:29:32 AM 856 Views
I fail to see how the whole team would be thrown out. - 26/07/2012 12:41:16 AM 851 Views
Because the IOC throws them out if the national government interferes in the national committe. *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:43:39 AM 455 Views
Well, that's absurd. - 26/07/2012 01:09:41 AM 931 Views
As with most things, I doubt the practice matches the theory - 26/07/2012 10:45:55 AM 834 Views
Africans != illegals - 25/07/2012 11:19:32 PM 887 Views
Specious reasoning. - 26/07/2012 12:07:08 AM 753 Views
Who are you to decide that? - 26/07/2012 12:16:45 AM 920 Views
I'm not the one deciding. - 26/07/2012 12:36:17 AM 754 Views
Essentially you're saying "there are lots of racists in Europe". - 26/07/2012 08:28:26 AM 872 Views
That's an oversimplification. - 29/07/2012 03:13:14 AM 824 Views
You stated it as a fact. - 26/07/2012 07:49:58 PM 810 Views
I think any organisation should have the right to choose who represents them - 25/07/2012 11:20:36 PM 829 Views
Well, but that's not the end of it. - 26/07/2012 12:12:09 AM 893 Views
It is for me - 26/07/2012 12:26:25 AM 804 Views
So...conformity ahead? *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:40:03 AM 392 Views
Is that all that happened? - 25/07/2012 11:28:17 PM 771 Views
That and some pro-Golden Dawn statements. - 26/07/2012 12:14:25 AM 956 Views
For me it is more than enough - 26/07/2012 12:32:35 AM 741 Views
It's not what happened to her that I typically waver on. - 27/07/2012 03:08:45 PM 779 Views
It's not a matter of freedom of expression - 26/07/2012 09:49:59 PM 966 Views
This. *NM* - 26/07/2012 10:26:37 PM 411 Views
I oppose censorship even if it is not comng from the government - 26/07/2012 10:16:30 PM 807 Views
How is it censorship? - 27/07/2012 02:33:30 AM 902 Views
try looking up the word censorship and ask yourself would their actions supress speech - 27/07/2012 02:59:11 AM 1031 Views
I know the definition thank you. How exactly was her communication suppressed? - 27/07/2012 05:54:39 PM 925 Views
you are right public punishment of political expression could never been seen as suppression - 27/07/2012 06:20:15 PM 1048 Views
Well - 27/07/2012 07:20:27 PM 804 Views
Where did she ever imply she wanted them to be bitten? *NM* - 27/07/2012 08:03:05 PM 470 Views
Hello earth.... "food from home". - 27/07/2012 08:26:15 PM 778 Views
OK I repeat my question: Where did she she WANTED them to be bit? - 30/07/2012 09:07:01 PM 1096 Views
Um, she referred to them as food? - 27/07/2012 08:38:22 PM 835 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:18 PM 526 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:27 PM 435 Views
I'm with you on this - I don't think she wanted them to be bitten. - 27/07/2012 09:02:05 PM 854 Views
It was insensitive at best - 30/07/2012 09:25:06 PM 1336 Views
One problem. - 27/07/2012 04:54:52 AM 806 Views
Exactly - 27/07/2012 12:05:14 PM 815 Views
I know you said it but do you actually believe it? - 27/07/2012 01:56:35 PM 784 Views
It's a good question, but yes, I do. - 27/07/2012 02:42:28 PM 837 Views
Are going to ban everyone and everyone country who says something about anyone else? - 27/07/2012 04:47:51 PM 750 Views
Yes, that is clearly exactly what I said. - 27/07/2012 05:10:37 PM 792 Views
i have a feeling you are being influenced by that pic they run with all the articles about her? - 27/07/2012 02:14:13 PM 808 Views
Surely you don't think... - 27/07/2012 02:57:47 PM 718 Views
Heh. - 27/07/2012 05:53:07 PM 963 Views
Typo? There are limits to our credulity... or to mine, anyway. - 27/07/2012 06:27:44 PM 803 Views
Looks like Voula Papachristou agrees with Tom - 27/07/2012 07:09:30 PM 830 Views
Quite understandable. But so's the Greek OC's decision. - 27/07/2012 07:11:31 PM 842 Views
And now a Swiss footabller has gone as well - 30/07/2012 08:22:45 PM 849 Views
That's just poor sportsmanship. *NM* - 30/07/2012 08:53:53 PM 532 Views
And an Australian athlete has been sent home now - 04/08/2012 10:12:12 AM 672 Views

Reply to Message