Active Users:999 Time:28/08/2025 11:55:55 PM
The national Olympic Committees aren't the government. Legolas Send a noteboard - 26/07/2012 12:02:43 AM
And if you seriously expect the government to go overruling its own OC when it makes a judgement call that will protect the country's reputation, on the grounds of defending the athlete's freedom of expression, you're taking idealism to a whole new level...

Of course, like I indicated in my other post, I'm personally inclined more towards the view that OCs shouldn't really be deciding who does and doesn't go to the Games, and that those who meet IOC requirements can simply go. In which case, agreed, nobody could force her to withdraw from the Games (they could pressure her tremendously, to be sure, but that's not the same thing).
Reply to message
Am I the only one who thinks Voula Papachristou should not have been kicked out of the Olympics? - 25/07/2012 10:55:19 PM 1324 Views
Being on a country's Olympic team is a privilege, not a right - 25/07/2012 11:00:24 PM 811 Views
So banning blacks would be cool if it was legal in that country? - 25/07/2012 11:08:52 PM 970 Views
If that's how the country wants to run itself - 25/07/2012 11:13:04 PM 843 Views
The IOC can ban nations from participating for that sort of stunt. - 25/07/2012 11:33:23 PM 993 Views
So that excuses thought control? - 25/07/2012 11:49:58 PM 897 Views
If Hitler could let Jesse Owens run... - 25/07/2012 11:07:19 PM 1034 Views
Yes. Political power should not be used to enforce morals. - 25/07/2012 11:53:19 PM 775 Views
The national Olympic Committees aren't the government. - 26/07/2012 12:02:43 AM 760 Views
Even worse. - 26/07/2012 12:08:05 AM 803 Views
Erm - 26/07/2012 12:29:32 AM 841 Views
I fail to see how the whole team would be thrown out. - 26/07/2012 12:41:16 AM 837 Views
Because the IOC throws them out if the national government interferes in the national committe. *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:43:39 AM 445 Views
Well, that's absurd. - 26/07/2012 01:09:41 AM 916 Views
As with most things, I doubt the practice matches the theory - 26/07/2012 10:45:55 AM 814 Views
Africans != illegals - 25/07/2012 11:19:32 PM 873 Views
Specious reasoning. - 26/07/2012 12:07:08 AM 738 Views
Who are you to decide that? - 26/07/2012 12:16:45 AM 902 Views
I'm not the one deciding. - 26/07/2012 12:36:17 AM 735 Views
Essentially you're saying "there are lots of racists in Europe". - 26/07/2012 08:28:26 AM 858 Views
That's an oversimplification. - 29/07/2012 03:13:14 AM 807 Views
You stated it as a fact. - 26/07/2012 07:49:58 PM 796 Views
I think any organisation should have the right to choose who represents them - 25/07/2012 11:20:36 PM 813 Views
Well, but that's not the end of it. - 26/07/2012 12:12:09 AM 877 Views
It is for me - 26/07/2012 12:26:25 AM 787 Views
So...conformity ahead? *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:40:03 AM 384 Views
Is that all that happened? - 25/07/2012 11:28:17 PM 750 Views
That and some pro-Golden Dawn statements. - 26/07/2012 12:14:25 AM 941 Views
For me it is more than enough - 26/07/2012 12:32:35 AM 726 Views
It's not what happened to her that I typically waver on. - 27/07/2012 03:08:45 PM 764 Views
It's not a matter of freedom of expression - 26/07/2012 09:49:59 PM 944 Views
This. *NM* - 26/07/2012 10:26:37 PM 404 Views
I oppose censorship even if it is not comng from the government - 26/07/2012 10:16:30 PM 783 Views
How is it censorship? - 27/07/2012 02:33:30 AM 887 Views
try looking up the word censorship and ask yourself would their actions supress speech - 27/07/2012 02:59:11 AM 1016 Views
I know the definition thank you. How exactly was her communication suppressed? - 27/07/2012 05:54:39 PM 911 Views
you are right public punishment of political expression could never been seen as suppression - 27/07/2012 06:20:15 PM 1033 Views
Well - 27/07/2012 07:20:27 PM 785 Views
Where did she ever imply she wanted them to be bitten? *NM* - 27/07/2012 08:03:05 PM 462 Views
Hello earth.... "food from home". - 27/07/2012 08:26:15 PM 764 Views
OK I repeat my question: Where did she she WANTED them to be bit? - 30/07/2012 09:07:01 PM 1081 Views
Um, she referred to them as food? - 27/07/2012 08:38:22 PM 814 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:18 PM 518 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:27 PM 427 Views
I'm with you on this - I don't think she wanted them to be bitten. - 27/07/2012 09:02:05 PM 839 Views
It was insensitive at best - 30/07/2012 09:25:06 PM 1291 Views
One problem. - 27/07/2012 04:54:52 AM 790 Views
Exactly - 27/07/2012 12:05:14 PM 792 Views
I know you said it but do you actually believe it? - 27/07/2012 01:56:35 PM 770 Views
It's a good question, but yes, I do. - 27/07/2012 02:42:28 PM 815 Views
Are going to ban everyone and everyone country who says something about anyone else? - 27/07/2012 04:47:51 PM 730 Views
Yes, that is clearly exactly what I said. - 27/07/2012 05:10:37 PM 777 Views
i have a feeling you are being influenced by that pic they run with all the articles about her? - 27/07/2012 02:14:13 PM 791 Views
Surely you don't think... - 27/07/2012 02:57:47 PM 704 Views
Heh. - 27/07/2012 05:53:07 PM 941 Views
Typo? There are limits to our credulity... or to mine, anyway. - 27/07/2012 06:27:44 PM 789 Views
Looks like Voula Papachristou agrees with Tom - 27/07/2012 07:09:30 PM 816 Views
Quite understandable. But so's the Greek OC's decision. - 27/07/2012 07:11:31 PM 821 Views
And now a Swiss footabller has gone as well - 30/07/2012 08:22:45 PM 835 Views
That's just poor sportsmanship. *NM* - 30/07/2012 08:53:53 PM 523 Views
And an Australian athlete has been sent home now - 04/08/2012 10:12:12 AM 658 Views

Reply to Message