Active Users:828 Time:14/02/2026 07:03:06 PM
I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship random thoughts Send a noteboard - 27/07/2012 04:18:54 PM
I see no room to argue about whether or not it is censorship and this in effect what you argued when you claimed no one was trying to silence since that is what censorship is. If pointing that out is offense then my only defense is I am offended by censorship and more offended by trying to give it a new coat of paint and then asking everyone to believe it is something else.

You argued that none is telling her to silent and I guess if you look at it narrowly enough that may be true but they are certainly trying to send the message that everyone else needs to keep their mouths shut or suffer the same fate. This isn’t a mild rebuke, the woman has worked her whole trying to compete in these games and she is being denied that because some bureaucrats took offense to an off color joke and her politcial party.

I see lots of mention of that political party and that certainly smacks of political motivation behind the censorship. I don’t know anything about this party she belongs to except that it has been called far right but one of two things are true. Either the party is more KKK than it is Tea Party and they promote hate and violence in which case sheshould have been banned regardless of the joke or it is a party that objects to having Greece over run by African immigrants in which case she has a right to that opinion regardless of the politics of the committee members and it is highly in inappropriate for them to bring her political beliefs into the discussion.

I do think there are times when censorship is required but I also believe we need to always keep that as far towards acceptance as possible. Banning someone from the Olympics for a tweeting an unfunny off color joke falls well short of that. If what she said offends people let that hurt with the lack of endorsements but don’t have a small unelected body say she is unworthy of representing her country because of a joke and her political party. That is blatant censorship and not the necessary evil sort of censorship but the sort that requires group think and suppresses the free exchange of idea.
Reply to message
Am I the only one who thinks Voula Papachristou should not have been kicked out of the Olympics? - 25/07/2012 10:55:19 PM 1382 Views
Being on a country's Olympic team is a privilege, not a right - 25/07/2012 11:00:24 PM 866 Views
So banning blacks would be cool if it was legal in that country? - 25/07/2012 11:08:52 PM 1015 Views
If that's how the country wants to run itself - 25/07/2012 11:13:04 PM 887 Views
The IOC can ban nations from participating for that sort of stunt. - 25/07/2012 11:33:23 PM 1037 Views
So that excuses thought control? - 25/07/2012 11:49:58 PM 939 Views
If Hitler could let Jesse Owens run... - 25/07/2012 11:07:19 PM 1081 Views
Yes. Political power should not be used to enforce morals. - 25/07/2012 11:53:19 PM 817 Views
The national Olympic Committees aren't the government. - 26/07/2012 12:02:43 AM 800 Views
Even worse. - 26/07/2012 12:08:05 AM 841 Views
Erm - 26/07/2012 12:29:32 AM 884 Views
I fail to see how the whole team would be thrown out. - 26/07/2012 12:41:16 AM 881 Views
Because the IOC throws them out if the national government interferes in the national committe. *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:43:39 AM 468 Views
Well, that's absurd. - 26/07/2012 01:09:41 AM 961 Views
As with most things, I doubt the practice matches the theory - 26/07/2012 10:45:55 AM 861 Views
Africans != illegals - 25/07/2012 11:19:32 PM 918 Views
Specious reasoning. - 26/07/2012 12:07:08 AM 783 Views
Who are you to decide that? - 26/07/2012 12:16:45 AM 948 Views
I'm not the one deciding. - 26/07/2012 12:36:17 AM 781 Views
Essentially you're saying "there are lots of racists in Europe". - 26/07/2012 08:28:26 AM 901 Views
That's an oversimplification. - 29/07/2012 03:13:14 AM 858 Views
You stated it as a fact. - 26/07/2012 07:49:58 PM 837 Views
I think any organisation should have the right to choose who represents them - 25/07/2012 11:20:36 PM 856 Views
Well, but that's not the end of it. - 26/07/2012 12:12:09 AM 920 Views
It is for me - 26/07/2012 12:26:25 AM 835 Views
So...conformity ahead? *NM* - 26/07/2012 12:40:03 AM 403 Views
Is that all that happened? - 25/07/2012 11:28:17 PM 801 Views
That and some pro-Golden Dawn statements. - 26/07/2012 12:14:25 AM 987 Views
For me it is more than enough - 26/07/2012 12:32:35 AM 766 Views
It's not what happened to her that I typically waver on. - 27/07/2012 03:08:45 PM 813 Views
It's not a matter of freedom of expression - 26/07/2012 09:49:59 PM 991 Views
This. *NM* - 26/07/2012 10:26:37 PM 422 Views
I oppose censorship even if it is not comng from the government - 26/07/2012 10:16:30 PM 837 Views
How is it censorship? - 27/07/2012 02:33:30 AM 928 Views
try looking up the word censorship and ask yourself would their actions supress speech - 27/07/2012 02:59:11 AM 1062 Views
I know the definition thank you. How exactly was her communication suppressed? - 27/07/2012 05:54:39 PM 952 Views
you are right public punishment of political expression could never been seen as suppression - 27/07/2012 06:20:15 PM 1079 Views
Well - 27/07/2012 07:20:27 PM 836 Views
Where did she ever imply she wanted them to be bitten? *NM* - 27/07/2012 08:03:05 PM 484 Views
Hello earth.... "food from home". - 27/07/2012 08:26:15 PM 804 Views
OK I repeat my question: Where did she she WANTED them to be bit? - 30/07/2012 09:07:01 PM 1127 Views
Um, she referred to them as food? - 27/07/2012 08:38:22 PM 862 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:18 PM 540 Views
No what is silly is inferring that she hoped they would be bitten *NM* - 30/07/2012 09:09:27 PM 448 Views
I'm with you on this - I don't think she wanted them to be bitten. - 27/07/2012 09:02:05 PM 880 Views
It was insensitive at best - 30/07/2012 09:25:06 PM 1390 Views
One problem. - 27/07/2012 04:54:52 AM 837 Views
Exactly - 27/07/2012 12:05:14 PM 840 Views
where do you people get these backasswards idea of what censorship is? PCmart? - 27/07/2012 02:01:29 PM 898 Views
We can have this conversation w/o you being mean. - 27/07/2012 02:57:02 PM 881 Views
I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship - 27/07/2012 04:18:54 PM 950 Views
Re: I never claimed I was against repercussions and people here are denying it is censorship - 27/07/2012 05:01:37 PM 860 Views
OK did I miss read what you said? - 27/07/2012 06:41:51 PM 1006 Views
No, but the disagreement is important. - 27/07/2012 07:09:11 PM 841 Views
I know you said it but do you actually believe it? - 27/07/2012 01:56:35 PM 820 Views
It's a good question, but yes, I do. - 27/07/2012 02:42:28 PM 864 Views
Are going to ban everyone and everyone country who says something about anyone else? - 27/07/2012 04:47:51 PM 776 Views
Yes, that is clearly exactly what I said. - 27/07/2012 05:10:37 PM 819 Views
i have a feeling you are being influenced by that pic they run with all the articles about her? - 27/07/2012 02:14:13 PM 834 Views
Surely you don't think... - 27/07/2012 02:57:47 PM 744 Views
Heh. - 27/07/2012 05:53:07 PM 988 Views
Typo? There are limits to our credulity... or to mine, anyway. - 27/07/2012 06:27:44 PM 826 Views
Looks like Voula Papachristou agrees with Tom - 27/07/2012 07:09:30 PM 856 Views
Quite understandable. But so's the Greek OC's decision. - 27/07/2012 07:11:31 PM 875 Views
And now a Swiss footabller has gone as well - 30/07/2012 08:22:45 PM 874 Views
That's just poor sportsmanship. *NM* - 30/07/2012 08:53:53 PM 544 Views
And an Australian athlete has been sent home now - 04/08/2012 10:12:12 AM 706 Views

Reply to Message