Active Users:333 Time:17/06/2025 10:12:37 AM
You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs Larry Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM
Saw it on Deadspin, but I don't think it's a joke:



Because of the LFL's perception it is that much more critical for us to hire officiating crews that are competent, not only for the credibility of our game but to keep our athletes safer. Due to several on-field incompetent officiating we chose to part ways with with a couple crews which apparently are now officiating in the NFL. We have a lot of respect for our officials but we felt the officiating was not in line with our expectations.

We have not made public comment to date because we felt it was not our place to do so. However in light of tonight's event, we felt it was only fair that NFL fans knew the truth as to who are officiating these games.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Linkage
Reply to message
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM 689 Views
I was gonna keep it to one thread, but hell, I'll join yours. - 25/09/2012 05:24:26 AM 759 Views
Link? Clip? - 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM 719 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM* - 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM 443 Views
Here's a link. - 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM 812 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM 634 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 05:52:55 AM 865 Views
Re: Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post. - 25/09/2012 06:13:46 AM 820 Views
youtube link - 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM 830 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD. - 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM 719 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened - 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM 984 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver. - 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM 1326 Views
watch a better replay if you can - 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM 782 Views
Have now; still not convinced. - 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM 828 Views
that's ok. you're still wrong - 26/09/2012 04:12:56 AM 842 Views
I know you are but what am I? *MN* - 26/09/2012 04:48:47 AM 781 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM 384 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited. - 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM 932 Views
Wait, you're not in Houston? *NM* - 26/09/2012 01:42:45 AM 401 Views
Not since the Texas Sesquicentennial, no. - 26/09/2012 01:45:29 AM 698 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees... - 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM 903 Views
Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM 897 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play. - 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM 806 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball. - 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM 735 Views
There are good views on nfl.com. Will link. - 26/09/2012 02:16:51 AM 877 Views
Thanks; I still do not see much to change my mind. - 26/09/2012 02:32:43 AM 806 Views
The last call was a joke. - 25/09/2012 06:52:59 AM 755 Views
You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs - 25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM 813 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year - 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM 839 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too..... - 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM 784 Views
They can't reverse that call. - 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM 864 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete - 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM 842 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM* - 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM 509 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM 417 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM 382 Views
Just so you can get this information without namecalling ... - 25/09/2012 04:18:41 PM 756 Views
No I mean he hasn't seen the replay over and over on ESPN *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:21:46 PM 389 Views
Interesting. What is the rule with arguing refs? - 25/09/2012 05:18:35 PM 701 Views
That response was disturbingly like my thoughts on the play. - 26/09/2012 01:49:37 AM 798 Views
As a Seahawks fan. - 25/09/2012 02:10:58 PM 750 Views
No. Not with that attitude. *NM* - 25/09/2012 04:03:32 PM 365 Views
*throws public tantrum* *NM* - 25/09/2012 10:39:22 PM 353 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see - 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM 847 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times. - 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM 651 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it? - 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM 1083 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip. - 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM 1082 Views
you sure you saw the right replay? - 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM 759 Views
Think so, yeah. - 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM 884 Views
from another angle -- pun intended - 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM 755 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip? - 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM 934 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug* - 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM 984 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily. - 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM 797 Views
did you even read that article??? - 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM 801 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...." - 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM 1106 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me either way, you're still wrong - 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM 886 Views
That is not an argument. - 28/09/2012 02:26:58 AM 699 Views

Reply to Message