You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs
Larry Send a noteboard - 25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM
Saw it on Deadspin, but I don't think it's a joke:
Because of the LFL's perception it is that much more critical for us to hire officiating crews that are competent, not only for the credibility of our game but to keep our athletes safer. Due to several on-field incompetent officiating we chose to part ways with with a couple crews which apparently are now officiating in the NFL. We have a lot of respect for our officials but we felt the officiating was not in line with our expectations.
We have not made public comment to date because we felt it was not our place to do so. However in light of tonight's event, we felt it was only fair that NFL fans knew the truth as to who are officiating these games.
Because of the LFL's perception it is that much more critical for us to hire officiating crews that are competent, not only for the credibility of our game but to keep our athletes safer. Due to several on-field incompetent officiating we chose to part ways with with a couple crews which apparently are now officiating in the NFL. We have a lot of respect for our officials but we felt the officiating was not in line with our expectations.
We have not made public comment to date because we felt it was not our place to do so. However in light of tonight's event, we felt it was only fair that NFL fans knew the truth as to who are officiating these games.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie
Je suis méchant.
Je suis méchant.
/NFL: now that replacement refs have cost the packers a win, can we please get the real ones back? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:14:58 AM
689 Views
Link? Clip?
- 25/09/2012 05:27:07 AM
720 Views
Let's just say that Gruden used the word "Jobbed" in the live telecast. *NM*
- 25/09/2012 05:35:08 AM
443 Views
Here's a link.
- 25/09/2012 05:36:56 AM
813 Views
Yes and no; that is the link I referenced in my post.
- 25/09/2012 05:47:07 AM
635 Views
youtube link
- 25/09/2012 07:00:29 AM
831 Views
Thanks; that looks like a textbook case of simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver: TD.
- 25/09/2012 07:29:28 AM
720 Views
pete carroll is a cheating douchebag, you cannot take his word for what happened
- 25/09/2012 10:59:33 AM
986 Views
I did not; I watched the clip: Simultaneous possession, which goes to the receiver.
- 26/09/2012 01:30:18 AM
1326 Views
watch a better replay if you can
- 26/09/2012 02:38:17 AM
783 Views
Have now; still not convinced.
- 26/09/2012 04:01:23 AM
830 Views
*MN*
also, the pass interference on tate that wasn't called is clear at 0:56 in that clip
- 25/09/2012 11:27:36 AM
790 Views
Tate was looking for the ball, and raised his hands to catch it, not push off Sam Shields.
- 26/09/2012 01:33:46 AM
753 Views
watch a better replay and get back to me on this one.
- 26/09/2012 02:36:43 AM
794 Views
Where did the NFL head office acknowledge that?
- 26/09/2012 03:52:36 AM
885 Views
in their official response to the whole incident....?
- 26/09/2012 04:14:52 AM
1019 Views
Fair enough then; the NFLs official position is that offensive PI should have been called.
- 26/09/2012 04:45:58 AM
798 Views
Yeah, if one hand counts as possession
- 25/09/2012 05:15:37 PM
803 Views
Left hand between Jennings' arms and on the ball; right was outside Jennings' arm and on the ball.
- 26/09/2012 01:38:28 AM
741 Views
How have you not seen this play? Are you in a cave? *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:57:55 PM
384 Views
No, I am in Norway, where NFL coverage is rather limited.
- 26/09/2012 01:40:07 AM
934 Views
While you can hardly blame the replacement refs because they are basically trainees...
- 25/09/2012 06:05:22 AM
904 Views
Now I really want to see this play.
- 25/09/2012 06:27:42 AM
898 Views
Re: Now I really want to see this play.
- 25/09/2012 02:48:56 PM
806 Views
I have still only seen the YouTube clip, but it looked like they both had both hands on the ball.
- 26/09/2012 01:58:27 AM
736 Views
You might appreciate learning that the Lingerie Football League fired some of these refs
- 25/09/2012 07:19:37 AM
814 Views
Tie goes to the receiver - the rule for decades. The Packers benefitted from worse calls last year
- 25/09/2012 11:31:47 AM
840 Views
you probably think greedo shot first too.....
- 25/09/2012 01:49:03 PM
785 Views
Possession doesn't mean squat until you land. Tate had it by then
- 25/09/2012 03:13:29 PM
791 Views
he had nothing until they landed and he tried to pull it away. everyone but you agrees on this *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:25:43 PM
374 Views
Not so; Cannoli and I agree on pretty much every point involved in this play.
- 26/09/2012 02:17:01 AM
763 Views
They can't reverse that call.
- 25/09/2012 04:43:28 PM
865 Views
the only possible way was to rule it incomplete
- 25/09/2012 10:42:25 PM
843 Views
It was very obviously caught; you can't rule that incomplete.
- 25/09/2012 11:06:17 PM
758 Views
my philosophy is "interception = incomplete" but i think that's only for stats purposes
- 26/09/2012 12:32:43 AM
732 Views
Congrats Cannoli, you are the only person (thing?) in the country who thinks it's a TD *NM*
- 25/09/2012 03:53:18 PM
509 Views
I'm not even the only person in this thread, moron. *NM*
- 25/09/2012 04:07:48 PM
417 Views
Joel hasn't even seen the play, douchebag *NM*
- 25/09/2012 04:12:35 PM
382 Views
I have seen enough of it, and while I did not write Cannolis response, I easily could have.
- 26/09/2012 02:06:45 AM
781 Views
Slightly (very) loopy yet entertaining piece on why Ayn Rand is to blame for all of this.
- 25/09/2012 05:38:12 PM
719 Views
She hates revenue sharing, salary caps & the draft, too, but the Pack would be screwed without each.
- 26/09/2012 03:34:00 AM
740 Views
Here's the proof Cannoli is refusing to see
- 25/09/2012 05:54:07 PM
848 Views
Clearer shot, but stills do not allow us to see where Tates hands were at all times.
- 26/09/2012 02:10:25 AM
652 Views
you can't claim "good ol' strip" *AND* simultaneous catch -- which is it?
- 26/09/2012 02:35:41 AM
1084 Views
I do not claim both: I claim simultaneous catch but IF not, then strip.
- 26/09/2012 03:51:47 AM
1084 Views
you sure you saw the right replay?
- 26/09/2012 04:21:57 AM
759 Views
Think so, yeah.
- 26/09/2012 04:58:15 AM
885 Views
from another angle -- pun intended
- 26/09/2012 04:01:54 PM
757 Views
There are two separate issues: 1) Was it a simultaneous catch; 2) IF not, was it a strip?
- 27/09/2012 08:54:52 AM
936 Views
your opinion is against pretty much everyone in the world, so..... *shrug*
- 27/09/2012 03:55:33 PM
985 Views
Thanks; I did not expect you to give in so easily.
- 27/09/2012 10:14:30 PM
797 Views
did you even read that article???
- 28/09/2012 12:35:39 AM
803 Views
"his control wasn’t established again...."
- 28/09/2012 01:08:03 AM
1107 Views
wow, what a thorough analysis you sent me 
either way, you're still wrong 
- 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
887 Views
either way, you're still wrong
- 28/09/2012 02:05:24 AM
887 Views
Worst calls are made all the time by the regular officials.
- 26/09/2012 01:23:57 AM
755 Views
yes, but not usually more than one per game, certainly not several in a single weekend.... *NM*
- 26/09/2012 02:39:56 AM
389 Views