Active Users:397 Time:17/06/2025 09:24:39 PM
As long as it is equitable imlad Send a noteboard - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM
I have no issue with men and women each having multiple husbands and wives, as long as all partners are adults and willing participants.

This means that if a woman wants multiple husbands (OR wives) and the other partners are fine with that, then I'm okay with it.

Like the Willow family on Caprica. That is a fine situation by me. A household of several men and women, all married to each other, all working together to raise all the children. How is that bad?

Where polygamy runs into problems is when it is only the men who can have multiple spouses, and those spouses aren't always adults when they marry, and don't always have a say in the marriage. THAT I will object to.

Of course, I would object to a system where only the women could have multiple spouses as well.

Like I said, if it is equitable, then it is fine by me.

Death to the Regressives of the GOP and the TeaParty. No mercy for Conservatives. Burn them all at the stake for the hateful satanists they are.
Reply to message
For all you supporters of Gay Marriage: What about polygamy? - 20/10/2012 12:02:06 AM 1441 Views
Legal rights. - 20/10/2012 12:14:10 AM 838 Views
It almost sounds like you are saying... - 20/10/2012 12:31:40 AM 825 Views
That is what I'm saying it. - 20/10/2012 01:07:50 AM 803 Views
Technically, privileges, not rights. - 20/10/2012 04:16:45 AM 807 Views
Sure - 20/10/2012 12:35:53 AM 735 Views
All for it... For adults over the age of 18. *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:18:04 AM 505 Views
What about it? - 20/10/2012 01:21:17 AM 801 Views
+1 *NM* - 20/10/2012 01:51:25 AM 535 Views
+2 *NM* - 20/10/2012 11:18:39 AM 406 Views
should be legal, would be nice for poly people. should include polygyny and polyandry. *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:29:05 AM 409 Views
poly people? - 20/10/2012 12:44:01 PM 834 Views
Government needs to stop legislating morality. So yes *NM* - 20/10/2012 03:36:37 AM 397 Views
That's a huge chunk of what government does. - 20/10/2012 04:35:45 PM 773 Views
That's not what I'm saying - 21/10/2012 03:21:08 AM 796 Views
So you're opposed to abortion and gun control then? Welcome aboard! - 21/10/2012 06:14:14 AM 747 Views
Why do you keep talking about gay marriage and polygamy in the same sentence.. - 20/10/2012 03:58:26 AM 814 Views
Get a grip. Your response is just what I tried to avoid. - 20/10/2012 04:33:40 AM 739 Views
The more fool you. - 21/10/2012 05:55:30 AM 829 Views
Ha! Point. *NM* - 20/10/2012 05:40:34 AM 673 Views
Marriage is always a choice, whatever the motive(s.) - 22/10/2012 04:00:40 PM 766 Views
I got no opinion on it. - 20/10/2012 12:51:43 PM 864 Views
The idea of a group marriage makes me uncomfortable - 20/10/2012 04:19:48 PM 742 Views
As long as it is equitable - 20/10/2012 05:55:57 PM 737 Views
The state shouldn't even recognize marriage beyond name changes anyway - 21/10/2012 03:52:40 AM 812 Views
Indeed - 21/10/2012 06:04:41 AM 874 Views
I don't give a damn what you call it. That's your business. - 21/10/2012 06:17:40 AM 1148 Views
And so? - 21/10/2012 07:05:08 AM 769 Views
Re: And so? - 21/10/2012 04:10:19 PM 954 Views
Legal contracts must be open to all consenting adults, or none. - 22/10/2012 03:11:55 PM 831 Views
You are correct, yet your reasoning is flawed. - 23/10/2012 03:20:25 PM 743 Views
Again, the Equal Protection Clause has far less force on private entities than on government. - 23/10/2012 03:52:06 PM 681 Views
Much less force, yes. - 23/10/2012 04:15:03 PM 691 Views
The crux is "If it's my business, it's my business." - 23/10/2012 04:43:25 PM 760 Views
+1 *NM* - 23/10/2012 07:36:46 PM 343 Views
No the analogy is not exact, nor legally the same... - 23/10/2012 07:33:25 PM 656 Views
Analogy is not equality, only similarity. - 24/10/2012 04:37:29 PM 859 Views
We aren't asking for something better or different. - 23/10/2012 04:27:04 PM 746 Views
yeah, it is very circular. - 23/10/2012 07:44:33 PM 785 Views

Reply to Message