Active Users:339 Time:03/05/2024 12:33:48 AM
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship. Joel Send a noteboard - 23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM
Raise your hand if you didn't see that one coming.

So we've got two possibilities: either the Obama Administration realized this would happen and decided to press ahead in order to indirectly put the Bush administration on trial (as well as the CIA, FBI, and the military) while still at war, or they legitimately didn't see it coming, thought everything would be sunshine and rainbows, and thus proving themselves only slightly less competent than a gang of brain damaged toddlers. Either way, I'm not too impressed, and I doubt the radical Islamists will be either.

And the rest of the world will say, "Man, I knew these guys were starkers, but... wow.... " Their followers back home will say, "look what the Americans are doing to our brothers!!!" and their neighbors will say, "trying them for murder? Because if any of the rationalizations for the killing were true this trial wouldn't be occurring. "

Let them expose themselves as the lunatics and sociopaths they are, before the world; hearing it from their own lips does us more good than anything we could ever say ourselves. How convinced are you when you see one of bin Ladens attack tapes? About as convinced as militant Muslims are when they hear Bush call bin Laden an evildoer. Thus far the leaders of each side have been the other ones best recruiters. If I call you a murderer, well, there might be some reason to think me less than objective, but if you stand up and admit it, who will defend you...?
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Reply to message
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden? - 20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM 997 Views
oO uhm, what? - 20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM 482 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started. - 20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM 509 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession. - 20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM 506 Views
As it seems we will. - 24/11/2009 09:41:18 AM 485 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial - 20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM 438 Views
Its to salve their conscinse - 20/11/2009 01:55:08 AM 439 Views
That's exactly the problem! - 20/11/2009 01:58:37 AM 464 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country - 20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM 465 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it. - 20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM 493 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended. - 20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM 379 Views
Spare me the bullshit. - 20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM 375 Views
I will if you will. - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM 465 Views
No, you won't. You never will. - 20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM 361 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem. - 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM 462 Views
No, that's not right. You don't read very closely. - 23/11/2009 02:21:54 PM 376 Views
In this case my reading comprehension is more than adequate. - 24/11/2009 09:16:39 AM 422 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow. - 20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM 417 Views
Allow me to point out... - 20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM 398 Views
Well, Timothy McVeigh was in OUR Army. - 20/11/2009 03:55:18 PM 515 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group - 20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM 440 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance. - 20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM 385 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM 398 Views
Yes. "Terrorist group". - 21/11/2009 12:02:04 PM 476 Views
Yeah I guess you're right - 22/11/2009 01:34:34 AM 387 Views
Military struggles involve militaries. - 20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM 551 Views
Once again, bullshit. - 20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM 521 Views
Aaaah, I see; it's a question of who's the master, is it? - 23/11/2009 07:47:43 AM 527 Views
You're wasting your time - 23/11/2009 02:24:57 PM 424 Views
This is wrong - 20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM 422 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli. - 23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM 470 Views
Nevertheless, uniforms or a nation is not a requirement - 23/11/2009 03:09:22 PM 431 Views
Rightly or wrongly, I disagree. - 24/11/2009 08:48:25 AM 477 Views
That is bad - 21/11/2009 12:31:04 AM 410 Views
You're not going far enough, man. - 20/11/2009 11:03:08 AM 458 Views
Blah blah blah blah blah *NM* - 20/11/2009 01:57:39 PM 193 Views
I just can't imagine how they expect to get a fair trial. - 20/11/2009 03:17:28 AM 383 Views
The Code of Conduct - 20/11/2009 07:23:02 PM 488 Views
The mention of God is interesting. *NM* - 21/11/2009 05:24:14 AM 307 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad... - 22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM 543 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative" - 22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM 527 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality. - 22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM 393 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy - 23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM 617 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship. - 23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM 523 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years... - 23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM 466 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here - 23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM 362 Views
And I've responded to yours - 24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM 439 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM 499 Views
They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists. - 24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM 618 Views
not every soldier in history has worn a uniform - 24/11/2009 11:00:34 PM 294 Views
One example would be Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys - 25/11/2009 06:23:08 PM 469 Views
Just for fun, let's call them fundamentalist vigilantes. *NM* - 24/11/2009 11:12:09 PM 167 Views
Works for me. - 01/12/2009 09:12:29 AM 449 Views

Reply to Message