Active Users:316 Time:02/05/2024 10:34:59 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life. Libby Send a noteboard - 23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM
Your point seems to be that we should damage our fighting capabilities in hopes that our enemies will change their minds when they see how fair we are to them? I won't go as far as to say that you're a retarded half-wit, but I will say that you seem to be delusional and naive :)


I don't need to be in a position to do that, someone else already is. Sucks to be you. The fact of the matter is, you have not provided any credible legal or moral justification for not trying terrorists in civilian court, eventough we've already have tried terrorists in civilian court already and they are now rotting behind bars.

Weakness is allowing terrorists to cow you into compromising your principles.

This message last edited by Libby on 23/11/2009 at 08:31:02 AM
Reply to message
No need to interrogate Osama bin Laden? beckstcw - 20/11/2009 12:48:27 AM 997 Views
oO uhm, what? LadyLorraine - 20/11/2009 12:54:13 AM 482 Views
If they're tried INSIDE the US, then yes, they are entitled to due process. Tom - 20/11/2009 01:44:08 AM 396 Views
Yeah, a lot of people were fuzzy on that till this started. The Name With No Man - 20/11/2009 09:30:39 AM 509 Views
on the other hand, we're more than willing to take them out back with a confession. LadyLorraine - 20/11/2009 06:34:12 PM 506 Views
As it seems we will. The Name With No Man - 24/11/2009 09:41:18 AM 485 Views
New York is now asking for $75 MILLION for the KSM trial Tom - 20/11/2009 01:43:26 AM 437 Views
Its to salve their conscinse Ryan - 20/11/2009 01:55:08 AM 439 Views
That's exactly the problem! beckstcw - 20/11/2009 01:58:37 AM 464 Views
If this trial were being held in any other country beckstcw - 20/11/2009 01:56:07 AM 465 Views
It's a terrible precedent no matter how you look at it. Tom - 20/11/2009 02:13:46 AM 493 Views
It IS a terrible precdent, hence you and others are citing it 65 years after WWII ended. Joel - 20/11/2009 09:23:45 AM 379 Views
Spare me the bullshit. Tom - 20/11/2009 01:57:16 PM 375 Views
I will if you will. Joel - 20/11/2009 02:55:30 PM 465 Views
No, you won't. You never will. Tom - 20/11/2009 06:14:30 PM 361 Views
You're putting your cart before your horse is the problem. Joel - 23/11/2009 05:40:46 AM 462 Views
No, that's not right. You don't read very closely. Tom - 23/11/2009 02:21:54 PM 376 Views
In this case my reading comprehension is more than adequate. Joel - 24/11/2009 09:16:39 AM 422 Views
You don't think this is a military struggle? Wow. beckstcw - 20/11/2009 02:52:26 PM 417 Views
Allow me to point out... Legolas - 20/11/2009 03:02:33 PM 398 Views
Well, Timothy McVeigh was in OUR Army. The Name With No Man - 20/11/2009 03:55:18 PM 515 Views
That's the thing, they aren't a terrorist group beckstcw - 20/11/2009 04:54:31 PM 440 Views
It would help if you would offer any argument in favour of your stance. Legolas - 20/11/2009 08:43:08 PM 385 Views
I only use the word army cause I can't think of a better one beckstcw - 21/11/2009 04:32:01 AM 398 Views
Yes. "Terrorist group". Legolas - 21/11/2009 12:02:04 PM 476 Views
Yeah I guess you're right beckstcw - 22/11/2009 01:34:34 AM 387 Views
Military struggles involve militaries. Joel - 20/11/2009 03:23:14 PM 551 Views
Once again, bullshit. Tom - 20/11/2009 06:09:31 PM 521 Views
Aaaah, I see; it's a question of who's the master, is it? Joel - 23/11/2009 07:47:43 AM 527 Views
You're wasting your time Tom - 23/11/2009 02:24:57 PM 423 Views
This is wrong Isaac - 20/11/2009 07:41:35 PM 422 Views
We're a long way from the shore of Tripoli. Joel - 23/11/2009 05:59:19 AM 469 Views
Nevertheless, uniforms or a nation is not a requirement Isaac - 23/11/2009 03:09:22 PM 431 Views
Rightly or wrongly, I disagree. Joel - 24/11/2009 08:48:25 AM 477 Views
That is bad AgentOrange - 21/11/2009 12:31:04 AM 410 Views
You're not going far enough, man. Joel - 20/11/2009 11:03:08 AM 457 Views
Blah blah blah blah blah *NM* Tom - 20/11/2009 01:57:39 PM 193 Views
I just can't imagine how they expect to get a fair trial. Gher - 20/11/2009 03:17:28 AM 383 Views
The Code of Conduct Isaac - 20/11/2009 07:23:02 PM 488 Views
The mention of God is interesting. *NM* Ghavrel - 21/11/2009 05:24:14 AM 307 Views
Your little diatribe in the beginning only makes me glad... Libby - 22/11/2009 05:32:57 AM 543 Views
I understand your "jihadist narrative" beckstcw - 22/11/2009 06:36:41 PM 527 Views
No you don't Libby - 22/11/2009 11:16:18 PM 459 Views
Oh, so you know better than Army attorneys about Miranda rights? Tom - 22/11/2009 11:52:00 PM 496 Views
I find no mention of Miranda in that article. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:13:05 AM 481 Views
I can explain it to you right now if you want? Libby - 23/11/2009 08:21:48 AM 395 Views
Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court: Tom - 23/11/2009 02:56:19 PM 471 Views
Re: Credible legal and moral justifications for not trying terrorists in civilian court: Libby - 24/11/2009 04:55:12 AM 601 Views
I'm glad that you will never be in a position where a decision you make can affect my life. beckstcw - 23/11/2009 12:27:35 AM 367 Views
Actually people of my thinking are already making decisions that affect your life. Libby - 23/11/2009 08:29:24 AM 497 Views
Please explain to me how military tribunals compromise my principles? beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:54:18 AM 363 Views
And your little hyperbolic rant would make more sense if it were grounded in reality. Tom - 22/11/2009 11:47:17 PM 393 Views
Looks like we'll get a Not Guilty plea, and a defense focusing on condeming US foreign policy beckstcw - 23/11/2009 12:36:47 AM 617 Views
They'll publicly accuse us of tyranny and brutality in front of a jury and without our censorship. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:27:13 AM 522 Views
My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:57:13 AM 441 Views
"My main objection is the awful precedent set by trying prisoners of war here in America. " Joel - 24/11/2009 06:57:34 AM 440 Views
We've had Mohammed in custody for over 6 years... Libby - 23/11/2009 07:56:49 AM 466 Views
I've already responded to your absurd statements, but let me reiterate a few here Tom - 23/11/2009 02:59:09 PM 362 Views
And I've responded to yours Libby - 24/11/2009 04:57:58 AM 438 Views
It's not, at least for me, that we feel the civilian courts are inadequate beckstcw - 24/11/2009 05:28:51 AM 422 Views
Good analysis of the situation. Joel - 23/11/2009 08:17:01 AM 530 Views
It isn't about sending a message. It's about horrible war fighting strategy. beckstcw - 24/11/2009 02:59:31 AM 488 Views
No. It's about not using a horribly ineffective strategy just to send a message to terrorists. Joel - 24/11/2009 09:29:06 AM 406 Views
enemy combatants and terrorists imlad - 23/11/2009 08:03:25 PM 499 Views
They're not different because from the Third World, but because terrorists. Joel - 24/11/2009 08:09:13 AM 618 Views
not every soldier in history has worn a uniform imlad - 24/11/2009 11:00:34 PM 294 Views
One example would be Ethan Allen and his Green Mountain Boys imlad - 25/11/2009 06:23:08 PM 469 Views
Just for fun, let's call them fundamentalist vigilantes. *NM* Vodalus - 24/11/2009 11:12:09 PM 167 Views
Works for me. Joel - 01/12/2009 09:12:29 AM 449 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes