and citing one unfortunate case doesn't change that.
Sounds like a misdiagnosis/or busy doctors not spending enough time on a patient. Which happens to people with insurance too. I can't tell you how many times doctors have blown off legitimate questions I have about my health because they might require more time and effort to address than just writing a prescription. I have to be rather insistent sometimes, and it turned out to be a good thing in one case.
Citing ONE case as proof that our system is fucked up is faulty logic, especially when we don't know all the details. How do you know they were just trying to get rid of him because he didn't have insurance? Or is that just you, being you and jumping to the conclusion that will best support your argument?
Which wasn't my point. My point was that what she said about her friend "flat out being denied treatment" if she were in the US is utterly false.
Happens to be the law, in fact; if you can't go anywhere else you can go to the most expensive source of medical care and after triage receive that care. Yet every time someone brings that up I recall the story of the Chicago man who came to the ER with chest pains, was diagnosed with indigestion, given Alka-Seltzer and discharged, then made it as far as the hospital before collapsing and dying of a heart attack.
Sounds like a misdiagnosis/or busy doctors not spending enough time on a patient. Which happens to people with insurance too. I can't tell you how many times doctors have blown off legitimate questions I have about my health because they might require more time and effort to address than just writing a prescription. I have to be rather insistent sometimes, and it turned out to be a good thing in one case.
Citing ONE case as proof that our system is fucked up is faulty logic, especially when we don't know all the details. How do you know they were just trying to get rid of him because he didn't have insurance? Or is that just you, being you and jumping to the conclusion that will best support your argument?
He was HAVING a heart attack when they "treated" him and they didn't catch it. Because they were just trying to get rid of someone who didn't have insurance, and did. Permanently. Incidentally, you don't ride in an ambulance for free either. One of the problems with our system as that the places that "must" provide those without insurance more than the basic care a clinic can provide are also the most rather than least expensive.
Which wasn't my point. My point was that what she said about her friend "flat out being denied treatment" if she were in the US is utterly false.
For Europeans who don't understand why Americans are against ObamaCare
03/09/2009 04:24:35 AM
- 1257 Views
I'd be happy to tax top "earners" more and suffer Europes economic "collapse. "
03/09/2009 04:30:31 AM
- 727 Views
The US will never work with socialism.
03/09/2009 04:40:21 AM
- 795 Views
Re: The US will never work with socialism.
03/09/2009 04:58:47 AM
- 780 Views
I don't think the mistrust of the government is really all that overblown
03/09/2009 05:04:34 AM
- 714 Views
It's advanced beyond what it was during the Revolution, I think.
03/09/2009 05:18:22 AM
- 753 Views
I would say it's grown with the government
03/09/2009 05:23:52 AM
- 734 Views
The key is that government shouldn't be heavily involved in personal lives.
03/09/2009 05:58:39 AM
- 765 Views
Re: I don't think the mistrust of the government is really all that overblown
04/09/2009 03:30:23 AM
- 678 Views
How much more can we really tax the wealthy??
03/09/2009 04:41:14 AM
- 639 Views
A lot; before Reagans "reforms" we already taxed them less than any other industrialized state did.
03/09/2009 05:06:00 AM
- 755 Views
I hear a lot of socialism coming from you.....
03/09/2009 05:19:08 AM
- 619 Views
Re: I hear a lot of socialism coming from you.....
03/09/2009 05:40:32 AM
- 702 Views
Nice non-answer answer.....
03/09/2009 05:52:04 AM
- 712 Views
You want detailed answers that require detailed data I don't have.
03/09/2009 06:06:55 AM
- 769 Views
Here are some facts and analyses.....
03/09/2009 02:40:22 PM
- 820 Views
The Heritage Foundation, huh?
03/09/2009 03:01:17 PM
- 827 Views

The non-working wealthy? Please quantify.....
03/09/2009 03:31:58 PM
- 786 Views
So you accept the CBOs assessment the House healthcare bill will be $1 trillion over the next decade
04/09/2009 03:02:13 AM
- 701 Views
You're so full of shit on this issue I don't know where to begin.
04/09/2009 03:15:55 AM
- 803 Views
Re: You're so full of shit on this issue I don't know where to begin.
04/09/2009 03:59:21 AM
- 887 Views
Less than 200 people were said to be US persons with Swiss accounts
04/09/2009 04:16:24 AM
- 691 Views
And yet account for many millions of dollars; what does that say...?
04/09/2009 04:21:57 AM
- 683 Views
It's statistically insignificant and your hyperbole is reminiscent of screaming guests on CNN.
04/09/2009 02:07:31 PM
- 619 Views
Well, look at this way:
04/09/2009 02:24:03 PM
- 747 Views
That's not a solution.
05/09/2009 02:39:12 AM
- 750 Views
The Soviets weren't socialist, or even communist, so it's a false comparison.
05/09/2009 03:09:06 AM
- 698 Views
Okay, now you've just gone into Kool-aid drinking territory.
05/09/2009 04:32:07 AM
- 816 Views
Communist THEORY is predicated on democratic participation at every level,totally absent in the USSR
05/09/2009 04:55:00 AM
- 938 Views
Ever heard of the 20-80 rule?
04/09/2009 04:28:54 AM
- 612 Views
Top earners? Please define.....what income and how much more? *NM*
03/09/2009 04:52:25 AM
- 488 Views
That would be open to definition, and should change with inflation.
03/09/2009 05:13:02 AM
- 869 Views
What is your justification for taking over 50% of anyone's income?
03/09/2009 05:28:22 AM
- 809 Views
That's a good example of why I say the rate has to be set to cost of living.
03/09/2009 05:50:16 AM
- 831 Views
Still no comment on the fact that 40% of Americans don't pay any income taxes?
03/09/2009 02:32:12 PM
- 752 Views
To what 40% do you refer?
03/09/2009 02:42:55 PM
- 612 Views
Dude, you are not making this easy.....
03/09/2009 03:38:01 PM
- 652 Views
No one "gets money from the IRS. "
04/09/2009 02:55:02 AM
- 659 Views
Actually with EIC you can get money back that you never paid in.
04/09/2009 02:56:43 AM
- 650 Views
It MIGHT be possible with the EIC, but in practice few people get more than they paid.
04/09/2009 03:43:36 AM
- 703 Views
I don't know, I've known plenty of people that have gotten more back than they paid in
04/09/2009 03:46:29 AM
- 782 Views
Yet another example of your ignorance on tax policy.
04/09/2009 03:19:39 AM
- 601 Views
The word I notice is "welfare"
04/09/2009 03:57:01 AM
- 713 Views
I wouldn't say that's what it means....
04/09/2009 04:02:40 AM
- 720 Views
It's what welfare means to me...
04/09/2009 04:32:17 AM
- 728 Views
I was just talking about EIC as a form of welfare, not welfare welfare. *NM*
04/09/2009 04:45:13 AM
- 418 Views
It's a credit for people who file a return on income that's been taxed.
04/09/2009 04:19:57 AM
- 655 Views
It is only for the WORKING poor, yes.
04/09/2009 02:12:55 PM
- 643 Views
Mean it may be, but hardly illegal.
04/09/2009 02:31:16 PM
- 669 Views
No real comments, just 100% agree with you....plus the $12 trillion is terrifying to me. *NM*
03/09/2009 04:33:39 AM
- 307 Views
Excellent post - the US government is not capable of running HC.....
03/09/2009 04:40:19 AM
- 601 Views
It depends on your level of cynicism
03/09/2009 05:38:53 AM
- 771 Views
when have they ever cut the fat?
03/09/2009 08:35:36 PM
- 696 Views
This doesn't make sense to me.
03/09/2009 08:33:18 AM
- 698 Views
The key phrase is "should be. "
03/09/2009 09:38:15 AM
- 869 Views
In fairness, most Europeans don't seem to realize what ObamaCare is.
03/09/2009 02:34:01 PM
- 746 Views
As far as most people I know are concerned, opposition to ObamaCare isn't the issue.
03/09/2009 11:04:36 PM
- 837 Views
It's hard not to be horrified with a government as wasteful as ours
03/09/2009 11:24:59 PM
- 613 Views
For Americans who don't understand why Canadians like their public healthcare.
04/09/2009 04:23:11 AM
- 725 Views
Correction
04/09/2009 04:44:32 AM
- 721 Views
Re: Correction
04/09/2009 05:05:11 AM
- 828 Views