Active Users:340 Time:18/05/2024 12:30:20 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
So? fionwe1987 Send a noteboard - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM

View original post
The reactions of the characters of the book are based on the character's perception. As a reader, we are privileged to know the totality of that character.

Precisely, so there's no ambiguity.


Based on that totality, "it" is appropriate based on the context.

No, it is not. I'm not sure what relevance Aran'gar being a character has to do with anything.

Reply to message
Aran'gar and the trans issue. Cannoli - 13/11/2018 12:25:48 AM 636 Views
This is exactly why the knee-jerk response was so amusing. damookster - 13/11/2018 01:18:28 AM 354 Views
I think you could argue it's surprisingly apt. TheCrownless - 13/11/2018 01:31:37 AM 389 Views
I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history" TheCrownless - 13/11/2018 01:26:41 AM 421 Views
Re: I think for once you were unfairly called out on this based on your "history" Cannoli - 13/11/2018 02:40:05 AM 368 Views
I don't know what's so hard to understand about this. You don't refer to people by 'it'. Legolas - 13/11/2018 08:09:34 AM 357 Views
People are refered to by "it" all the time.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 05:26:33 PM 350 Views
But remember, human fetuses aren't people. /s *NM* TyrReborn - 13/11/2018 05:42:00 PM 279 Views
Your second example rather proves my point, don't you think? Legolas - 13/11/2018 07:50:39 PM 336 Views
and those of us defending Cannoli maintain damookster - 13/11/2018 07:59:08 PM 319 Views
I'm not really commenting on Cannoli's post.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 09:20:13 PM 334 Views
FWIW mine was concerning ambiguity Cannoli - 13/11/2018 11:01:03 PM 366 Views
Okay, sure. Legolas - 13/11/2018 11:26:58 PM 357 Views
Interesting.... Jeordam - 13/11/2018 11:36:43 PM 343 Views
Because it is just contempt Roland00 - 13/11/2018 11:45:08 PM 479 Views
I think I mostly covered that above, but I can recap. Legolas - 14/11/2018 08:02:51 AM 347 Views
Who's on the phone? aerocontrols - 14/11/2018 01:53:14 AM 351 Views
Sure, I agree. Legolas - 14/11/2018 07:45:58 AM 357 Views
Aran'gar does not, and doesn't have to represent, trangender people for your usage to be wrong fionwe1987 - 13/11/2018 03:21:42 PM 366 Views
Except that it isn't a person, it is a character in a book HyogaRott - 14/11/2018 02:57:12 PM 342 Views
So? fionwe1987 - 14/11/2018 07:18:10 PM 354 Views
Re: So? HyogaRott - 17/11/2018 02:13:37 PM 319 Views
Upon reflection, I have edited the original post Cannoli - 13/11/2018 08:02:17 PM 350 Views
Thank you. *NM* Legolas - 13/11/2018 11:31:41 PM 169 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes